Engage the Malaysian Insider's Outsider online

November 29, 2009

Indian Couple Caught Red Handed Having Public Sex In Malaysia with more still

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 6:55 pm


Source: www.GutterUncensored.com

 

Here is a shot video clip of a couple in Malaysia having sex in a not so private placeOr it is better I say, here is a video clip of a couple in Malaysia getting caught having sex in a public place. Either way, pubic sex is awesome except in this case.

 

Download the Sex Videos After the Screen Shots Below!



Download

Indian Couple Caught Red Handed Having Public Sex In Malaysia

Kenny Gan’s seriously troubling questions in mother illusionist the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research the maysianinsider is 100% correct najib

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 1:57 pm

Kenny Gan’s seriously troubling questions in mother illusionist the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research the maysianinsider is 100% correct najib

In electoral science, statistics are illustrative, interpretation is critical and everything is fluid. Politics is evolutionary, and evolution – even Darwin’s – is a theory, not a fact. No election is an echo of the past, let alone a mirror of the future. judge gave BN the best “staircase” to step down in this crisis with dinity; but BN decide to induce Court of Appeal judge and press the “Suicide Bomb”.Najib, are you really a Malaysian leader? Are you realised you are the Destructor of this country from the day you assumed the post of Perak UMNO Chief? By appealling a stay order for the High Court decision, BN have burn its last effort to convince voter in the future.MCA, MIC and others BN components parties! I know you are the Loyal Doggy, but would you think of how is the perception of peoples towards BN, UMNO and you?The “Right or Wrong, True or False, Moral or Immoral” in this political impasse is decide by Rakyat, not the so called judges, lawyers, Umno warlords or even Sultan.BN, you are come to the end of road, and the only destination for you is “Hell”! SHAFIE: VOTERS MUST SHOW MALAYS CAN UNITE ,The whole nation is waiting for voters decision to choose najibHadi is forcarimakan unity,or Nik AbdulAzizamwar true unity
The statistics of last general elections do not justify the self-evident depression that has overtaken And yet, the seats went in the opposite direction.Statistics across the partisan border are no less fascinating.A statistical approach to national elections is more likely to provide accurate predictions than to regional polls.READTHISwe malaysians the suckers to mother illusionist the Merdeka Center for Opinion Researchthe maysianinsider is 100% correct najib is an illusionist
A critical mass has now formed for a stable government at the Centre, but interest groups and legitimate demands in large states like Perak have become too diffuse for coherent analysis.It does make difference for public who forms the govt. in Public is only a means with a vote in hand. Govts. are formed by party coalition who succeed to fool the people to vote for them in sufficient numberREADTHISSCENE5 The Curtains are raised and we see a darkened stage. Lights fade in. The scene begins in “THE 4thfloorWAR ROOM” a shadowy enclave Well done Datuk Zaid… let’s fight together for a better Malaysia
.The bane of the country is no doubt the politicians but the real faulters are the citizens of this country. They themselves get into the race religion and what not. So if these politicians suck even their bloods out of their body they should not blame them. It is the malay mulim vote, the non malaymuslim vote, I mean what are we talking about. Is this the way the government be selected. Even if the muslim guy gets selected I am pretty sure that he is going to exploit the muslims more than any body else. When will the people of this country understand god knows. may be it will be too late by the time they understand. The politicians will be in US or UK with their money in the Swiss Banks. Go for it guys .READTHISWe will never enjoy Democracy if we are not willing to work for it & defend it.Mahathirism has been a terrible curse on Malaysia.
.
.don’t think it will be easy anymore for UMNO/BN to take urban voters – esp those from Sgor, Pg & Perak for granted. Incl the folks of Sabah & Swak. The era of Mahathir, the glamor days of 90s stock market bull runs & information blockage is over. UMNO would have lost the battle long before 8/3/08, if not for their stranglehold on the mass media. Time has run out, senor Najib. The Altantuya Albatross hangs around your neck – it will continue to hang there, cos either public opinion will not give you rest about it; or if UMNO gets pissed off with you, then I am quite some sure UMNO Godfather will authorise “leakages” re: Altantuya. Just see what’s happening to the Negeri MB. Are we surprised that the UMNO warlords of NS are beginning to make their moves? Perhaps the bargaining chip might have something to do with a photo taken in PD..
POSTED BY THE TAXI DRIVER786

November 28, 2009

THE STING UMNO ALIBABAKAN MCA Grand Theft Malaysia

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 9:10 pm

 

 

GRAND THEFT MALAYSIA

BY THE TIME THE EVIL BARISAN ENDS NOTHING WILL BE LEFT ‘MALAYSIAN MAVERICK: MAHATHIR MOHAMAD IN TURBULENT TIMES’, DIRECT FINANCIAL LOSSES AMOUNTED TO ABOUT THE RM100 BILLION WHILE HIS PEOPLE ARE HUNGRY

GRAND THEFT MALAYSIA

by taxi2driver

THE MCA GURKAS,Transport Minister Ong Tee Keat,, Datuk Liow Tiong Lai ex-minister SAMY VAL WAS ASK TO CLOSE ONE EYE THIS IS HOW THEY RIP OFF THE N ATION’ whem DIAM proposed it at $2 today,how did the prime land in sentul west and in brickflields enith YTL AND MRRCB?S,

Sime Darby is suffering. Iam just helping my brother is it crime? Mohd Najib’s way of helping to prop up the (new) Sime Darby, which is essentially the product of his brother’s market-making? help our sibling Mohd Najib’s way of helping to prop up the (new) Sime Darby.

PRIVATISATION IS THE LICENSE FOR ELITE MALAYS TO THE EAT the POOR MALAYS, THE MCA GURKA Datuk Liow Tiong Lai WAS ASK TO CLOSE ONE EYE THIS IS HOW THEY RIP OFF THE N ATION’S WEALTH. THIS IS MAHARTIRISM. The postponement comes just a day after Najib revealed that the green light had been given to Sime Darby to acquire a majority stake. The Umno elite appear to be out of touch not only with the masses but also with their They are very impatient before the power take over, why the over confidence? ? Because someone somewhere needs to generate more money in their pockets Will there be another government hand out to Nazir’s ideas -not that they are really despicably bad his ideas- but just that we had been told by Najib himself of more transparent transplant of less corruptive values in negotiating government jobs, had we not just recently? Will the Government be building a another new IJN once this IJN is sold off? Where? How many? What is price tag on IJN are we talking about here?Who is funding the take over? As Finance Minister and the chief “fatal” backdoor takeover of Golden Hope and Guthrie Corporation by Sime Darby via Synergy Drive, which was the creation of his brother, Mohd Nazir.Sime Darby was once a diversified and highly regarded company. Today, thanks to the merger and its sudden dependence on palm oil, Sime Darby is suffering. Iam just helping my brother is it crime in our country To help our siblings Could the proposed sale of IJN to Sime Darby be Mohd Najib’s way of helping to prop up the (new) Sime Darby, which is essentially the product of his brother’s market-making? I beg Mohd Najib to start thinking seriously about the welfare of the masses like his late father did instead of pushing the country towards exclusivity for the sake of profits and short-term gains . Take for example Prince Court Medical Centre (PCMC)which costed Petronas RM770 million in total was built in the view that this is a social obligation by Petronas to serve the public at large. But how many people actually go to PCMC? To be honest, I don’t know where PCMC is heading in the healthcare business. I have some specialist friends who are being paid in excess of RM50k a month to do visitation in PCMC and yet come back complaining about lack of patients and procedures to be performed. Well, if you want to have a corporate social responsibility, might as well build a hospital in Sudan, Chad or Somalia. suffer from their actions.there more people can we are poor . THE SUDDENESS with which the news that the National Heart Institute (IJN) may be privatised to Sime Darby appeared in the media suggests that conspiracy of sorts is at work.a promise as “guaranteeing low fees for the poor” is made by no less then the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Mohd Najib Abdul Razak, himself. How they rip off KTMB RICH LANDBANKand let it bleed to slow death if only could they allow the likes tonny and hisgang to take over whem DIAM proposed it at $2 today We would have the best rail service in Asia butexminister SAMY VAL..HOW ? YOU ALL KNOW ABOUT PERWAJA, ASK PKR’s Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim BANK BUMIPUTRA, PKFZ issue was first raised by PKR’s Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The public waited patiently for full disclosure. It was slow in coming. But now that Pricewaterhouse Coopers has completed and submitted its report, Transport Minister Ong Tee Keat should come clean and put the matter to rest. PKFZ issue was first raised by PKR’s Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The public waited patiently for full disclosure. It was slow in coming. But now that Pricewaterhouse Coopers has completed and submitted its report, Transport Minister Ong Tee Keat should come clean and put the matter to rest.

The Port Klang Free Zonescandal may be big, but it is only the latest in a long line of Malaysian scandals going back to the early 1980s. Time Magazine quoted Daniel Lian, a Southeast Asia economist at Morgan Stanleyin Singapore, saying that the country might have lost as much as U$100 billion since the early 1980s to corruption.”

The scandals listed below are only a small sample of the looting of the country’s coffers:

In July of 1983, what was then the biggest banking scandal inworld history erupted in Hong Kong, when it was discovered that Bumiputra Malaysia Finance (BMF), a unit of Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd, had lost as much as US$1 billion which had been siphoned off by prominent public figures into private bank accounts. The story involved murder, suicide and the involvement of officials at the very top of the Malaysian government. Ultimately it involved a bailout by the Malaysian government amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Mak Foon Tan, the murderer of Jalil Ibrahim, a Bank Bumi assistant manager who was sent to Hong Kong to investigate the disappearance of the money, was given a death sentence,and Malaysian businessman George Tan who had participated in looting most of the funds, was jailed after his Carrian Group collapsed in what was then Hong Kong’s biggest bankruptcy, and a handful of others were charged. No major politician was ever punished in Malaysia despite a white paper prepared by an independent commission that cited cabinet minutes of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad giving an okay to a request to throw more money into the scandal in an effort to contain it.

That was just the first Bank Bumi scandal. The government-owned bank had to be rescued twice more with additional losses of nearly US$600 million in today’s dollars. Ultimately government officials gave up and the bank was absorbed into CIMB Group, currently headed by Nazir Razak, the prime minister’s brother. That scandal, which stretched over several years before its denouement in 1985, set the tone for 24 years of similar scandals related to top Malaysian officials and was the first to prove that in Malaysia, you can not only get away with murder, you can get away with looting the treasury as well.

Perwaja Steel, for instance, lost US$800 million and its boss, Eric Chia, a crony of Mahathir’s, was charged with looting the company. He stood trial, but was acquitted without having to put on a defense.

In the mid 1980s, the Co-operative Central Bank, a bank set up to aid the Indian smallholder community, had to be rescued by Bank Negara, the country’s central bank, after hundreds of millions of ringgit in loans granted to a flock of United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) and Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) politicians became non-performing. Some had never been serviced at all. Although the chief executive and general manager were charged with criminal breach of trust, none of the politicians were ever charged.

Before that, the Malaysian government was believed to have lost US$500 million in an attempt at Mahathir’s urging to corner the London tin market through a company calledMaminco, driving the world price of tin from US$4.50 per tonne to US$7.50. It then sought to cover up the loss by establishing a US$2 company called Mukawasa from which allocations of new share issues to the government’s Employees Provident Funds’ were diverted. Mukawasa expected to sell the shares at a windfall profit to hide the tin speculation.

Mahathir also was behind an attempt by the then governor ofBank Negara,the central bank, to aggressively speculate in the global foreign exchange market. Bank Negara ended up losing an estimated RM20 billion. The governor, Jaffar Hussein, and the head of forex trading, Nor Mohamed Yakcop were forced to resign.

There have been many other political and financial scandals since. In 2005,Bank Islam Malaysia, the country’s flagship Islamic bank, reported losses of RM457 million mainly due to provisioning totaling RM774 million as a result of bad loans and investments incurred by its Labuan branch. Cumulatively, Bank Islam ran up nonperforming loans of RM2.2 billion, partly from mismanagement and poor internal controls but also “years of regulatory indifference fueled by the misconceived notion of an untouchable Bank Islam because it was a favorite child of the Malaysian government, being the first and model Islamic bank in the country and region,” according to a December 19, 2005 article in Arab News.

“Bank Islam had a reputation in the market for being the spoilt child of the Malaysian Ministry of Finance; and the perception of the bank was more of a Muslim financial fraternity or government development financial institution,” the report said.

In 2007, in what was called Malaysia’s Enron scandal, the publicly tradedTransmile Group Bhd, whose chairman was former MCA President and Cabinet Minister Ling Liong Sik, was caught having overstated its revenue by RM530 million. A pretax profit from Rm207 million in 2006 was actually a loss of RM126 million, and a pretax profit of 120 million in 2005 was a loss of RM77 million, causing the government postal company Pos Malaysia & Services Holdings Bhd to warn that its earnings for the 2006 financial year might be affected by the reported overstatement, as the postal group owned 15.3 percent of Transmile.

Over the years 2001 to 2006, the government had to spend billions to rescue seven privatized projects including Kuala Lumpur’s two public transport systems, the perennially ailing Malaysia Airlines, the national sewage system and a variety of others that, in the words of one study, “had been privatized prematurely.” The government also repeatedly bailed out highway construction concessionaires, all of them closely connected to UMNO, to the tune of another RM38.5 billion.

In 2008, it was revealed that Rafidah Aziz, who had served as trade and industry minister for 18 years, had been peddling approved permits for duty-free car sales and allegedly lining her pockets. Two companies which didn’t even have showrooms – one of which belonged to the husband of Rafidah’s niece – received scores of permits. Although Rafidah came in for heavy criticism from within UMNO, she remained in office until she was defeated in party elections.

In the 1960s, federal prosecutors in the United States who were attempting to jail the late labor boss Jimmy Hoffa for looting the Teamsters Pension Fund of millions of dollars with his cronies were puzzled by the fact that their revelations appeared to have little effect on the union’s rank and file. It was because no matter how much money Hoffa and his cronies stole, there was always money left because the fund was so rich. That appears to be the case with Malaysia.

POSTED BY THE TAXIDRIVER786 AT 5:03 PM 0 COMMENTS LINKS TO THIS POST

November 27, 2009

WHY DID RAZAK BAGINDA HAS WAIT FOR THE A.G OFFICE prosecution NOT follow thru with an appeal BEFORE HIS FIRST MEET PRESS? WHAT WAS HIS MESSAGE TO THE MALAYSIANS WHO ARE THE SUCKERS

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 12:10 pm

GHOST Altantuya SAYS THE ROPE IS AROUND YOUR NECK SAY YOUR LAST PRAYERS ROSMAH MANSOR

Its just too damned obvious that PI Bala,

WHY WAS BALA KIDNAPPED BY MUSA HASAN’MEN TAKEN TO PRINCE HOTEL IN JALAN CONLAY INSTEAD OF BUKIT AMAN?

being an experienced investigator, knew what was going on. With the DPM Najib desperately making sms messages to Razak Magainda and with hook and crook, got Razak aquitted from the murder trial, it is just that Najib all along had planned for Razak to be his fall-guy and to be paid handsomely.click this A.G OFFICE FRAME ANWAR FOR SAYING ‘GELEDAH ‘ SENT HIM TO 7YEARS NOW the sms Bala can link WITH ENOUGH EVIDENCE AND WITNESS TO SENT NAJIB TO JAIL FOR ABUSE OF POWERIt does not make sense for Razak to murder Altantuya with C4, after all even he is charged with the murder, his position does not give him the authority to involve so many uniformed personnel to carry out this scenario. Thus Najib can claim to be not involve with Altantuya. Now that Razak is aquitted and he cannot be charged again with the same charge, Najib thinks that he can still get away with this cruelsome murder. If Abdul Razak Baginda didn’t order two elite cops to kill a Mongolian translator, who did?

After one of the lengthiest trials in Malaysian history, a politically well-connected insider was acquitted Friday of ordering the murder of his jilted lover, a woman whose death had the potential to reach into the highest levels of the ruling party.

With the acquittal of political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, the question was left hanging of who ordered the murder of Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu on October 19, 2006, allegedly by Police Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar. After ordering Abdul Razak freed, High Court Judge Mohd Zaki Md Yasin ordered the two put on a defense.

Altantuya, aged 28 at the time of her death, was executed by two shots to the head in a jungle clearing near the Kuala Lumpur suburb of Shah Alam on October 19, 2006 and her body was blown up with C4 explosives available only to the military. She reportedly had come to Malaysia to confront Abdul Razak over his decision to end their affair.

The two belonged to an elite bodyguard unit under the control of Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who appears likely to become the country’s next prime minister, and who was one of Abdul Razak’s best friends.

During the 151-day trial, in which 84 prosecution witnesses testified, none of them was Najib although two statutory declarations and other evidence linked him to the dead woman. According to a detailed sworn statement by P. Balasrubramaniam, a private investigator that Abdul Razak hired to keep Altantuya away from him after he had broken off their affair, the political analyst told him he had inherited the Mongolian woman as a lover from Najib because Najib didn’t want to be harassed as deputy prime minister.

However, almost immediately after Balasubramaniam made the statement public, he was hustled to the Brickfields police station in Kuala Lumpurwhere he said he had been coerced into making the statement and recanted it entirely. He and his entire family have since disappeared. Raja Petra Kamaruddin, the influential blogger who printed the statement in his Internet publication Malaysia Today, was arrested under the country’s Internal Security Act and is serving two years in prison. He is also being sued for criminal defamation over some of his reports that tied Najib and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, to the murder. He has also been charged with sedition for publishing other articles on the murder.

Rosmah has denied Raja Petra’s allegations but said she would not sue. Asked why not, she told local media on July 1: “If you are innocent, what is there for you to address? I am not a politician and I am not running for any post. I’m just the wife of a politician.”

If Najib or his wife had filed the charges, under the law they would be subject to motions for discovery and cross-examination, which presumably would not happen if the state instead filed the charges. More than once the filing of defamation charges has bounced back on the plaintiff because of that reason.

According to evidence introduced at the trial and other sources, Abdul Razak contacted Najib’s chief of staff, Musa Safri, to ask Najib’s bodyguards, Azilah and Sirul, to “do something” about Altantuya. Musa was not required to appear as a witness. Deputy Commander Mastor Mohd Ariff, an associate of the two bodyguards, said members of the unit were required to follow all orders of their superiors without question, describing the unit’s members as “like robots” who would only take orders from their superiors. Abdul Razak, a civilian and friend of Najib’s, was not a superior officer. According to an affidavit filed by Abdul Razak, Azilah contacted Abdul Razak after Altantuya’s disappearance to say that “tonight encik (sir), you can sleep well.”
Testimony by the murdered woman’s cousin indicated that immigration records of Altantuya and the two Mongolian companions who had come toMalaysia with her to confront Abdul Razak disappeared from the government’s immigration files. She also responded to a question that she had seen a picture of Altantuya having dinner with Najib before she was hurriedly hushed up by both prosecution and defense lawyers.

Nonetheless, Judge Mohd Zaki dismissed a bid in July to call Najib as a witness in the trial. Zaki also refused to call Balasubramaniam despite his written declaration, which implicated Najib in the events leading up to the murder. In addition to other lurid details, Balasubramaniam described text messages between Najib and Abdul Razak in which the latter was asking for help to avoid arrest.

Later, a series of text messages was made public indicating that Najib had been involved in finding a lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, to represent Abdul Razak. One message from Shafee to Najib said: “We provided (the police) everything, including old PDAs and notebooks and a couple of bills. Nothing incriminating.” Malaysia Today said the exchange raises questions if anything “incriminating” was kept from the police.

Besides allegations that Altantuya was the lover of both men, the case has raised additional concerns of corruption at the top of the United Malays National Organisation, the leading political party in the national ruling coalition. The Mongolian woman appears to have been the translator on a controversial transaction in which Malaysia, with Najib as defense minister, paid €1 billion for French submarines, netting a company tied to Abdul Razak US$111 million in “commissions.”

A letter written by Altantuya shortly before she disappeared indicated that she was attempting to blackmail Abdul Razak for US$500,000, raising suspicions that she had inside knowledge of the transaction. The woman’s father, Shaariibuu Setev, a psychology professor in Ulan Bataar, said she had been killed because she “knew too much,” although he never elaborated on what she knew.

The trial has been rife with other irregularities. At the start, the original judge was replaced by Mohd Zaki. The prosecution was hurriedly changed so quickly that the trial had to be postponed. There were numerous attempts to limit the introduction of physical evidence. Sirul’s confession was ruled invalid because it was not cautioned.

The prosecution also sought to impeach two of its own important witnesses. One, Lance Corporal Rohaniza Roslan, was the girlfriend of the senior of the two bodyguards and said she saw Altantuya being taken away in a car by her boyfriend. Later she said her testimony had been coerced. Another was Yusri Hasan Basri, a member of the bodyguard team and a colleague of Sirul, who said he had important information on physical evidence in the home
The more he tries to elude from this unending probe into his involvement the more evidence will surface with the help of the spirit of Altantuya. On 11th October, Malaysia Today carried a post entitled ‘Abuse of power by the Deputy Prime Minister’ that laid out a series of sms’es alleged to have passed between Najib and senior lawyer Shafee Abdullah in relation to Razak Baginda’s arrest and remand in the days before Baginda was charged.

Najib was publicly asked to comment about these sms’es and he never denied the authenticity of the same.

Now, there’s one other exchange of sms’es, this time allegedly between Razak Baginda and Najib. I do not recall Najib himself having ever addressed or denied or admitted the correctness or otherwise of these sms’es directly, as he did with the series of sms’es referred to in the MT posting.

I am referring to the 2 sms’es mentioned at paragraphs 51 and 52 of the first statutory declaration of private investigator Balasubramaniam. Let me reproduce below both paragraphs 51 and 52 of that first statutory declaration.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30am. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Najib Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30am, Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Najib Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows: “ I am seeing IGP at 11am today … matter will be solved … be cool”.

Like all of you, I am aware of Bala’s second statutory declaration contradicting the first, but we also have to acknowledge that the circumstances surrounding the making and public announcement of the second statutory declaration, and the subsequent disappearance of the maker of both, might make it prudent for us to defer adjudging which of the two statutory declarations narrates the truth until such time that Bala is available to fully disclose andexplain the circumstances surrounding the making of both statutory delcarations.AS THE TAXI DRIVER SAW…ALTANTUYA’S LAST HOURS.

THIS TAXIDRIVER HAVE BEEN HELPING HER FROM DAY ONE BUT THE MAINSTREAMMEDIA SAID THE IS HER PRIVATE P’I YOUR WRONG BUDDY SHE HAS TOLD EVERY THING TO HIM HIS LAST RESEARCHED ARTICLE HIS BLOG WAS CLOSED DOWN THEY FORGET I HAD THE HARDCOPYHer last journey starts at night when she gives a slip to bala’s men watching her movements, she took her last taxi ride from hotel Malaya to bagindas house. What could have been the topic of her discussion with the taxi driver? Was he the one who took down the car registration no, which was used in a grab at bagindas house?.

What she told about EVERYTHING NAJIB abandon her at the last moment, she was helpless? As the taxi stop she was grabbed and bundled into that car and driven off. If only they had waited, for the taxi go then they had grabbed her, they could have pull off the perfect MURDER
With her name erased from the immigration entries, she will be in the missing persons list. But god was on her side that day, because she had to be scarified, in order to bring to open the evil forces that are planning to rule this country. But to PAS PRESIDENT it just a murder why we have to make it an issue out of it?

The taxi driver went back to the stand at hotel Malaya to be confronted by the victim’s cousin sister to whom he gave the vital informations. The Rest is history…………………………

lastest news BALA come to visit SURESH PAID HIS DUE Will we ever know who killed Altantuya Shaaribuu and who authorised use of C4?I’m sure S’pore have the video recordings of 3 of them at the Diamond exhibition. such expensive exhibition and high tech country….or maybe just release the visitor’s registration book.SCENE8 daylight sting at HIGH NOON Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yewhave the video recordings of 3 of them at the Diamond exhibition. such expensive exhibition and high tech country….or maybe just release the visitor’s registration book. SO HE GOT THE DEAL DIRT CHEAPNajis have swore that he have never met Altantuya before in a mosque, come on S’pore, just let us have the video. we won’t say it’s from you. we just want the TRUTH, that’s all…..proof to us you are truly Asian!

Two parts in Bala’s SD, explains PI’s lawyer: Razak Baginda had every opportunity of denying all Bala had said in his first SDThe first statutory declaration signed by controversial private eye P Balasubramaniam consists of two parts – one on what was told to him and the other involves what he personally saw himself..from a most unhlikely source, I have been reliably informed…..straight from the Steppes of Inner Mongolia comes this conversation. I was also reliably informed that this was sent to Malaysia Today as a sequel to the letter sent by Altantuya’s father. Read on
The following text message correspondence is between YAB Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak, Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, and Dato’ Shafee Abdullah, a Malaysian lawyer who initially represented Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda who is on trial for abeting the murder of Mongolian national, Altantuya Shaariibuu.

While it does not answer lingering questions about Najib’s alleged past relations with Altantuya, the text messages show clearly Najib’s active intereference in the case very early on. The messages highlight Najib’s willingness to speak with both members of the Attorney General’s Chambers and Inspector General of Police about the case, something that suggests an abuse of executive power.

What is particularly revealing and troubling is that the counsel, Shafee, keeps asking Najib for details indicating some political intervention that may have influenced the case. This observation is strengthened by Najib’s message to Shafee on 16 November 2006: “Pls do not say anything to the press today. i will explain later. RB will have to face a tentative charge but all is not lost.” This message raises a lot of questions about Najib’s role in this case. Why did he mention “tentative” charge and that “all is not lost” for RB (Razak Baginda)? How would Najib know this before Razak was charged? Is there already a deal in place that will see Razak aquitted? These are important questions which will have ramifications not just on this case but far beyond.

The text messages were transmitted between Najib’s personal mobile phone. Those who seek the truth should challenge Najib and Shafee to deny that this correspondence took place between them. Perhaps a record of the messages still resides in the server of the relevant telecommunications company.
The truth is buried somewhere. Those who know what truly happened hope that the truth has been buried deep with Altantuya. But the funny thing is, the truth always finds its way into the hands of those who fight for justice – sometimes in the most mysterious circumstances……

WHYMUST HE GET HIS ADC INVOLVED? WHERE IS BALA?HIS SD STATE THE SAME
According to Balasubramaniam’s lawyer, Americk Singh Sidhu , the first part involves statements that the private investigator was in a position to ascertain their truth.
“He was therefore alluding to the fact that these statements were made to him, but was not alluding to the truth of those statements.”
This include where Balasubramaniam said he was told about the fact that Najib and murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu had a relationship.
“The second part of Bala’s first SD reflects what he experienced himself. This would be not be regarded as hearsay evidence.”
Examples are the message Balasubramaniam saw on Abdul Razak Baginda’s mobile phone on the day the political analyst was arrested.BALA IS ONLYWITH ENOUGH EVIDENCE AND WITNESS TO LINK NAJIB
The SMS message, purportedly from Najib Abdul Razak, informing Razak Baginda that the then deputy prime minister was “seeing the IGP (inspector-general of police) at 11am that day and to be cool”.
Razak Baginda, known to be Najib’s close confidant, was later freed from the charge of abetting the murder of his former lover Altantuya.
Americk also said that the Altantuya trial raised more questions than answers and where certain evidence was not brought to court.
“As the matter stands, we have two highly trained members of the Special Action Force killing a Mongolian national for no apparent reason. This is what was bothering Bala at the time he made his first SD.”
The following is the final of a three-part interview:
Malaysiakini: When you recorded Bala’s first SD, did you feel he was telling you the truth?
Americk: I have said this before. I have no reason to doubt the contents of Bala’s first statutory declaration (SD). However, it must be borne in mind that there are actually two parts to Bala’s first SD.
The first part involves statements that Bala says were told to him by third parties. Bala himself cannot verify the truth of these statements. That is why I said at the first press conference that these statements reflect exactly that.
All Bala was saying is that these statements were made to him and that he perceived them with his own senses. He was therefore alluding to the fact that these statements were made to him, but was not alluding to the truth of those statements.
why didn’t the prosecution follow thru with an appeal and more importantly why the courts granted the acquital to Mr Baginda in such a contradictory fASHION
this is what is left after c4 who ordered itInhumanity talks!READ THIS RELATED ARTICLEUnfair To Drag Wife Into Husband’s Politics –Najib his 2nd wife rosmah,murdered Altantuya, because she “knew too much,”Would people believe what he was saying? Being a confidant of Najib, he is out to defense his boss as directed?! Anyway, all fair-minded people have already formed their opinions and no matter how strong the defence is, ‘two wrongs cannot make one good’!

Will people be interested with the so-called new chapter of his stinking life? Not at all because he’s unorthodox in human nature and cruelty and brutality is his name! We wonder how he is going to forget his old chapter when Altantuya will keep haunting him, whenever he dine, he will see his hand full of blood! Can he gracefully thanks God that he’s given free tomato sauce?!

All people will be waiting to read the footnote of his new chapter – “This great man full of sins has been pardoned by God”, ash to ash is the retribution! I will puke at it!
In legal parlance these statements were hearsay and would not be admissible as evidence in a court of law until and unless they could be supported by other independent evidence and even if they were, the weight of this combined evidence is something a judge would have to consider before accepting or rejecting it.
Examples of statements under this category would include the following:
1) That Altantuya had a relationship with Najib.WHY DID ALTANTUYA HAVE TO DIE?Corrupt political leadership does not attractive men of outstanding integrity; neither can it be expected to enact effective laws to maintain high integrity in government NOTE THIS BLOG WAS CLOSED BY ROSMAH
2) That Razak Baginda was introduced to Altantuya by Najib at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
3) That Altantuya was promised a commission of US$500,000 for her services in the Scorpene submarine deal.
The second part of Bala’s first SD reflects what he experienced himself. This would be not be regarded as hearsay evidence. Examples of these statements include the following:
1) That he had contact with Altantuya on a number of occasions in October 2006.
2) That Razak Baginda hired him to keep Altantuya away from him.
3) That he saw Azilah (Hadri) and Sirul (Azhar Umar) bundle Altantuya into a car outside Razak Baginda’s house on the night of Oct 19, 2006.
4) That Altantuya, at that time and place, had asked Bala to arrange for her to see Najib.
5) That Bala had, on Oct 21, 2006, received a call on his mobile phone from Musa (Mohd) Safri whilst he was outside the front gate of Razak Baginda’s house, asking to speak to the police officer who was there attempting to persuade three of Altantuya’s friends to disperse.
6) That Bala had given evidence for the prosecution in the Altantuya murder trial and had not been asked a number of very pertinent questions.
7) That Bala had himself seen a message on Razak Baginda’s mobile phone (the day Razak Baginda was arrested), purportedly from Najib, informing Razak Baginda that he was “seeing the IGP at 11am that day and to be cool”.
It is also pertinent to note that Razak Baginda had every opportunity of denying all Bala had said in his first SD, at the press conference he called after his acquittal. However, he chose not to say anything except that he had given his statement to the police.
If there is any doubt as to the veracity of Bala’s first SD, this can be tested by comparing it to two other statements recorded from him.
The first statement was recorded by the investigating officers in the Altantuya murder case. This is the statement Bala complained of in his press conference and first SD. He alleged that all ’sensitive’ information he had given the police was erased from that statement.
The second statement was given to senior federal counsel Sallehuddin (Saidin) just prior to the commencement of Altantuya’s murder trial. It must be remembered Sallehuddin was one of the prosecutors on the first prosecution team but dropped when the second prosecution team was mustered.
According to Bala, this second statement is 76 pages long and details everything that appeared in his first SD.
If the police are really keen in looking into this whole matter again to determine the truth, my suggestion would be to obtain copies of both these statements and compare them to the contents of his first SD. After all, they were prepared by the prosecuting authorities and should be readily available to the police.
What prompted Bala into making the first SD?
As Bala pointed out, he was a little frustrated that the police had not investigated the murder properly and that the prosecution had not conducted their case appropriately. He had been called to give evidence as a prosecution witness but was not asked a number or relevant questions.READ THISAn unbelievable spectacle took place in the bizarre murder trial of Mongolian beauty Altantuya Shaaribuu on June 29. the combined forces of the prosecution and defense blocking the line of questioning.
He felt the police and the prosecution were trying to cover up the possible involvement of other parties in this murder.
There is no doubt Azilah and Sirul shot Altantuya in the head and blew her body up with C4 explosives. The court has already found them guilty.
There is also available on the Internet a full confession under s.113(1)(a)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, signed by Sirul and dated the 9.11.2006 (Travers report no. 7380/06) in which he has detailed the circumstances in which he and Azilah committed this murder.
There is also a mention of a promise of a reward of RM100,000 for these services. This statement was recorded by one inspector Nom Phot Prack Dit at Bukit Aman. This statement was not allowed to be tendered at the murder trial.
Azilah and Sirul did not give evidence under oath in their defence and therefore avoided any cross-examination on motive.
As the matter stands, we have two highly trained members of the Special Action Force killing a Mongolian national for no apparent reason.
This is what was bothering Bala at the time he made his first SD.
In his experience as a police officer attached to the Special Branch, he found it rather odd that two policemen would kill someone without receiving instructions to do so from their superiors.
In this case Azilah and Sirul were Najib’s bodyguards and were supposed to take instructions from Musa Safri, Najib’s ADC (aide-de-camp).
Bala felt Musa Safri, at least, should have been called to the stand to testify.
Do you think the Altantuya murder trial was conducted in a fair manner?
Fair to who?
I think the first question that ought to be asked is why it was necessary to change all the players in this trial even before it started? No doubt this is the prerogative of the accused in their choice of counsel, and of course the Attorney General’s Chambers in the appointment of prosecutors it feels more suitable. Of course a judge can be changed as well, but all three parties at once seems a little odd.
As the trial proceeded, it became obvious that there was a concerted effort by the prosecution and the defence to prevent any highly fragile evidence from being adduced. This became even more obvious during the questioning of Altantuya’s cousin, Burmaa Oyunchimeg, by Karpal Singh, who was holding a watching brief for Altantuya’s family.
Burmaa, whilst being questioned by the prosecution had mentioned a photograph shown to her by Altantuya that showed Altantuya, Razak Baginda and a senior government official at a meal. The prosecution and the defence vehemently objected to the eventual answer that Burmaa gave, ie that the senior government official was Najib.
This episode begs the question as to whose interests the defence was supposed to have been protecting? Certainly not their own clients.
It is also interesting to remember Sirul’s statement from the dock at the end of the trial. He said, and I quote, “A black sheep that has to be sacrificed to protect unnamed people who have never been brought to court or faced questioning”.
I think that says it all. Mkini
POSTED BY THE TAXIDRIVER786 AT 6:18 AM

November 26, 2009

The ghost of the used car salesman MEET The ghost murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 6:34 am

 

 

 


please expose the identities of all NAZA shareholders and directors…. they are the NAZI .

Since the Mahathir regime, Malaysia has been a heavenly land for the corrupt, hell for the ordinary honest citizens.

The ghost of the used car salesman turned billionaire NAZA founder is still very much haunting the Malaysian taxpayers even after he kicked the bucket his living partner in crime is Rafidah Aziz.

As long as it involves corruption, no amount of explanation can make a deal seem above board. In other words it cannot withstand scrutiny unless absurd answers in desperation are given by people like Mustapa. He must be at the end of his political career, therefore its time to milk the cow like PKZ. So much for transparency. Or is it that Naza has suddenly realised that its tiem for them to do the rakyat a big favour….Bull

Wonder that whole bunch of monkeys in the cabinet ever used a calculator before.

Naza, after raping the nation all these years through the AP scam, is coming back again for more. The cancerous NEP decease has crept deep into the government machinery and private bumi-status corporate sector since Mahathir.

The ghost of the used car salesman turned billionaire NAZA founder is still very much haunting the Malaysian taxpayers MEET The ghosT

please expose the identities of all NAZA shareholders and directors…. they are the NAZI . Since the Mahathir regime, Malaysia has been a heavenly land for the corrupt, hell for the ordinary honest citizens. The ghost of the used car salesman turned billionaire NAZA founder is still very much haunting the Malaysian taxpayers even after he kicked the bucket his living partner in crime is Rafidah Aziz.

As long as it involves corruption, no amount of explanation can make a deal seem above board. In other words it cannot withstand scrutiny unless absurd answers in desperation are given by people like Mustapa. He must be at the end of his political career, therefore its time to milk the cow like PKZ. So much for transparency. Or is it that Naza has suddenly realised that its tiem for them to do the rakyat a big favour….Bull

Wonder that whole bunch of monkeys in the cabinet ever used a calculator before. Naza, after raping the nation all these years through the AP scam, is coming back again for more. The cancerous NEP decease has crept deep into the government machinery and private bumi-status corporate sector since Mahathir.

 

LinkedIn!

By Tony Pua

In an astounding reply to the Parliament and to reporters at the Parliament, the Minister of International Trade and Industry (MITI), Datuk Mustapa Mohamed claimed that:

Matrade is not putting up a single cent. Otherwise we have to beg and steal and borrow from the government. But maintenance is, of course, ours. That building, when it is completed in four years, is going to be ours. We are getting the building for free, otherwise we have to pay RM628 million, which is a big amount of money.

The usually composed and competent Minister fondly known as Tok Pa, must have had a moment of madness for claiming that the Government will get Malaysia’s largest convention and exhibition centre “for free” from Naza TTDI, when the latter is being paid with 62.5 acres of prime land.

The Minister had earlier replied in Parliament that the 62.5 acres of land given in exchange for the convention and exhibition centre was valued at RM197 million.

The reply still leaves Malaysians completely flabbergasted as the Minister expects us to believe that Naza TTDI, a private company belonging to the Naza Group which has milked billions from “Approved Permits” to import luxury cars via MITI is so charitable as to build a RM628 million convention and exhibition centre at the price of RM197 million.  If what the Minister had said is true and accurate, Naza TTDI is in fact “donating” RM431 million to the Malaysian Government, and we should all be eternally indebted to Naza for its immeasurable generosity.

However, the Minister’s reply only raises more questions, for there must be a catch somewhere in the entire exercise.  At RM197 million for the 62.5 acres piece of land means it is valued at only RM72 per square feet, which is unbelievably low for the prime land between Mont Kiara and Jalan Duta.

In a report by The Star on the 18 November:

Sources valued the state land, when converted to commercial land, at between RM350 to RM500 per sq ft.  “RM500 may be a bit on the high side, but it makes sense. The total gross development value (GDV) of all the projects on that 65 acres is going to be RM15bil. That means the market value of that commercial land of 65 acres is RM1.5bil,” Kumar said.

A source who declined to be named said at RM500 per sq ft, the land cost would comprise 10% of the total GDV of RM15bil that Naza is undertaking. In Singapore, the land cost can go up to 50% of GDV, in Hong Kong, it is 65% of total GDV.  “If it is valued at RM350 per sq ft, the cost of land is about RM970mil. So it is around that range,” Kumar said.

Kumar Tharmalingam is the chairman of Hall Chadwick Asia Sdn Bhd, a leading property consultant in Malaysia.  He is also a resident of FIABCI Asia Pacific Real Estate Federation and Secretary General of FIABCI Asia Pacific Secretariat, the International Real Estate Federation headquartered in Paris and a Board Member of FIABCI International based in Paris and Immediate Past President of FIABCI Malaysia, so he should certainly know what he is talking about.

Hence, even by taking the conservative estimate of RM350 per square feet by the experts, which works out to a valuation of RM970 million for the land paid paid to Naza TTDI, the Government is in fact paying RM342 million more than the stated RM628 million cost of building the Matrade Convention and Exhibition Centre!  And if we take the higher estimate of RM500 per square feet, then the Government is in fact paying in excess of RM870 million!  Under such circumstances, it will not be wrong to say that it is Naza TTDI which has received land from MITI “for free”.

When asked why was Naza TTDI awarded the contract without “open tender”, Datuk Mustapa Mohamed responded that it was because they were the first company to “propose the project”.  Instead of reassuring the public, this reply has cemented the fact that the Barisan Nasional Government is addicted to cronyism for the Naza Group had intimate links with MITI having received hundreds of thousands of APs from the Ministry. It is now clear that due to the connections of Naza, they were able to table the convention and exhibition centre proposal to the powers that be at MITI and as a result, ensure that they will have exclusive rights to the project.

Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak’s “second wave of privatisation” announced in the 2010 Budget is starting on a disastrous note, and his promise and commitment to “open tender” to “curb corruption and bring back the people’s confidence in the Government” lying in complete tatters.

Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak must immediately conduct a probe into the irregularities surrounding the project and make immediate rectifications to ensure that the income for all its existing assets are maximised.  He must suspend the project pending the investigations, and all its outcome must be disclosed publicly to ensure that the final decision of the Government is able to withstand scrutiny.

Muslims marginalized. who are this hindu mother fucker terrorists?

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 4:30 am

 

 

Mumbai terror: Will it be a reason used to kill Muslims & attack Pakistan

 

A limited "Cold Start Doctrine" will surely end up as a Full Fledged Hot War ending up in 250 Nuclear Mushroom delivered by Pakistan to Indian cities. Mutually Assured Destruction. No Indian General can guarantee that a limited strike will not end up as a hot war leader to a nuclear exchange and the end of life in South Asia for a thousand years

 

A limited strike against Pakistan may lead to a warm war which may esclate into a mushroom cloud

The Voltaires of India are quiet, too scared to question the carnage. The mighty Indian media controlled by corporatism has become more obsequious than Pravda or Izvestia. Icons of the press freedom like Tehilka cannot survive amid the tough commercial environment. Bigotry sells. Pakistanphobia sells even more. The words of Arundhuti Roy are either marginalized or ignored because she is labeled as a communist.

readmore click here

Mumbai terror: Will it be a reason used to kill Muslims & attack Pakistan

 

(Reuters) – Tension is running high between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan after militants attacked Mumbai.

India says it has proof of a Pakistani link to the Mumbai attacks that killed nearly 200 people, raising the prospect of renewed confrontation between the countries.

Pakistan condemned the assault, denied any state agency was involved and assured India of full cooperation in investigations. Highs and lows in Pakistan-India ties, Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:11pm IST

Mumbai: Intoxicated India deaf & blind to internal terror. Unable to introspect, resolve its huge race, caste & religious problems

mumbai-taj-hotel

This isn’t Indias 9/11. This is Indias Oklahoma City, said Ms Fair, referring to an April 1995 domestic attack in the US that killed 168 people.


 

 

the 9/11conjob

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34 Killtown: Air vs. Skyscraper

 

Calling them “pseudo-moderates,” the Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan Commission of Inquiry has indicted former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee along with current Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha L K Advani and former BJP president Murli Manohar Joshi, among others, for the demolition of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992.

Citing the evidence it gathered, which includes witness statements and official records, one of the key conclusions of the Commission is said to be that the entire build-up to the demolition was meticulously planned. And there was nothing to show that these leaders were either unaware of what was going on or innocent of any wrongdoing.

The one-man Commission probed the “sequence of events leading, and all facts and circumstances relating, to the occurrences at Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid complex on December 6, 1992” — the day the Babri Masjid was brought down by kar sevaks.

Sources in the Union Home Ministry have confirmed to The Indian Express that the report is also severely critical of many Muslim leaders representing organizations such as the Babri Masjid Action Committee and the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee.

The elite leaders of these Muslim organizations, the report is learnt to have observed, constituted a class of their own and were neither responsible to nor were they caring for the welfare of those they claimed to represent. These leaders failed the community by failing to put forth a logical, cohesive and consistent point of view on the dispute, both inside and outside the courts, the Commission is said to have stated.

The Home Ministry, which is giving final touches to the action taken report (ATR), intends to table the ATR in Parliament along with the report of the Commission during the ongoing Winter Session.

The Commission was set up 10 days after the demolition as communal riots rocked several parts of the country. After 17 years and 48 extensions, it submitted its report on June 30 this year.

It is learnt that among others indicted and found culpable — for what the Commission calls pushing the nation to the brink of communal discord — are the entire top brass of the Sangh Parivar. These include the leaderships of the RSS, VHP and Shiv Sena.

It is learnt that Justice Liberhan has not come down heavily on the then Union Government headed by P V Narasimha Rao. Its argument: as per the Constitution, the Union Government can act only after it receives the recommendation of the state Governor. In this case, the Governor didn’t do much and also didn’t seek the Centre’s intervention.

The report is learnt to have said that despite claims to the contrary, the Ayodhya campaign did not enjoy the willing and voluntary support of the common masses, particularly Hindus. In fact, Liberhan is learnt to have said that the demand for a temple never became a mass movement. The campaign only ended up silencing the voices of sanity and shaming them into joining the movement.

Liberhan is learnt to have said that despite claims by Advani and Vajpayee that they had no role in the demolition, the two leaders cannot be absolved of their responsibility for the same. When he appeared before the Commission, Advani had said he was pained by the events at Ayodhya on December 6, 1992.

Liberhan is said to have stated that while Vajpayee, Advani and Joshi could have been used by the Parivar as the publicly acceptable faces of the movement, they were still party to all decisions.

And that none of them had the capacity to defy the orders of the RSS without damaging their political future. In fact, the Commission calls them tools in the hands of the RSS.

However, drawing from history, particularly from the trials of Nazi soldiers, at which the plea of having acted on the orders of superiors was not accepted, the Commission is learnt to have concluded that these leaders can’t be given the benefit of doubt or absolved of culpability. Vajpayee, Advani and Joshi have also been indicted for having violated the trust of voters.

Rath yatras by Advani and Joshi, Liberhan is learnt to have concluded, were targeted at making the emotionally-charged common man join the movement.

In sharp contrast to the BJP and the Sangh Parivar stand that the demolition was a spontaneous outburst, Liberhan is said to have argued that the events resulting in the demolition were carefully planned.

The Commission is also said to have concluded that diversion of funds to Faizabad and Ayodhya just before the kar seva, mobilization of kar sevaks as well as arrangements made at the site with military-like precision, clearly proves that the plan was not just limited to symbolic kar seva, as stated by Sangh and BJP leaders.

To substantiate this argument, Liberhan is learnt to have pointed to the mode of assault on the disputed structure as well as easy availability of instruments and material. The small number of kar sevaks who actually carried out the demolition, the hidden faces of such kar sevaks, the removal of idols and cash boxes from under the domes and the eventual installation in the makeshift temple clearly show that demolition was carried out with painstaking preparation and planning, he is learnt to have said.

The report is said to suggest that the emergence of a host of leaders to lead the movement from among the ranks of the BJP, RSS, Bajrang Dal and other Sangh Parivar groups was because of the lure of wealth and power rather than ideology.

Liberhan is learnt to have written that these leaders saw the Ayodhya movement as their road to success, and they acted as executioners wielding swords provided by the ideologues.

Referring to the funds collected by leaders of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, the Commission has reportedly said that many tens of crores of rupees collected from the people were deposited into bank accounts operated by these leaders. These funds were used to provide infrastructure and other amenities for kar sevaks in the days leading to the demolition. Babri demolition meticulously planned, says Liberhan, indicts Atal, Advani

Let’s stop jabbering about 26/11

Pritish Nandy  Monday November 23, 2009
The sole purpose of terrorism is to terrorise us. It is to create fear, gut wrenching fear, and spread panic everywhere. If terrorists can’t get that right, if they can’t whip up enough fear and hysteria, their entire purpose is defeated. All the bloodshed, all the deaths add up to nothing and people forget the tragedy as quickly as they forget a bus falling into a ravine or a train toppling over at high speed. The statistics of death don’t scare us any more. What scares us is the way it happened.
That’s the difference between an accident, an Act of God, and a terrorist strike, though some fanatics would like us to believe that a terrorist strike is an Act of God. It is not. It is just another criminal act, plotted and planned by criminals, and often executed by some foolish, misled young men who are angry with life and society. There was a time, when I would have added the word poor to describe them. No longer. The kind of people who plot, plan and execute terror acts are no more poor, illiterate, foolish people who have been misguided by criminals masquerading as religious or political leaders. As Kasab told the courts, he was sold off to the Lashkar by his father when he was a kid. He grew up indoctrinated.
Today’s terrorists are a different lot altogether. They are smart, educated, well brought up young men and women who have wilfully taken to terrorism to fight for what they see as their cause. To defeat them is not easy and, as time goes on, it will become even more difficult because they are no longer people you can easily recognise or would even suspect as potential terrorists. Many of them are white. Some come from affluent Western families. No, they are no longer recruited from poor, third world nations. Terrorists come today dressed in Armani suits, flaunting Ivy League badges. Surprise is their secret weapon. That’s how their first axiom is best served, to spread gut wrenching fear. That’s what gets them the headlines.
Headlines are what terrorists die for. Headlines and non-stop television coverage. That’s why 9/11 was such a great success for them. That’s why 12/10 in Bali, 7/7 in London, 26/11 in Mumbai were such famous strikes. The recent bomb blasts in Peshawar and Rawalpindi are no match. They were just messages to the ISI from their former protégés, to warn the Pakistan establishment that they won’t let them rest in peace as long as they play surrogate to the US army in return for billions of dollars in aid. It’s never easy to pull back the demons you unleash. Yes, people are dying in these terror attacks. There’s lots of bloodshed. Women, children, ordinary people are getting drawn into this tragic vortex of violence. But none of this is as important as headlines. Headlines create fear, panic, terror. For terrorists, headlines are everything.
So every time we revive memories of 26/11, show hours and hours of TV coverage, write long scary articles on how terrorism has destroyed our lives and liberties, we are actually encouraging the terrorists, helping them build their superstructure of fear. Terrorists do not need to celebrate the success of 9/11 or 26/11. We are doing it for them, even as we weep for the victims and tell the world that we are better prepared to face future strikes. Let’s not kid ourselves. Terrorism is the scourge of our times and no Government, no police force is ever adequately equipped to anticipate it. The more we talk about the pain, the horror, the memories of these terrible events, the more the perpetrators celebrate, the more they go down in history as villains or heroes, depending on who is providing the perspective, and to whom. In the wilds of tribal Pakistan where the Taliban is schooling its recruits, Kasab is a hero and his dead colleagues, martyrs to the Cause.
It’s important, therefore, to treat such anniversaries with caution and circumspection. We don’t really need to overload the nation with cardiac stress. 26/11 was a terrible tragedy and also a moment of amazing heroism. We lost some of our finest policemen and many innocent people who had no reason to die. But our future lies not in recalling its memories and reassuring the rascals who perpetrated it that they had struck home and caused us unforgettable pain. It’s no use crying over our failures, our mistakes. It’s important to be prepared for the future, as prepared as we can possibly be, but it’s even more critical to move on with our lives, show the world we are not afraid. Terrorism may hurt us but it cannot break our spirit, our resolve. Therein lies our courage, our wisdom as a nation.
And therein lies defeat for those who use terrorism as their weapon.

Let’s stop jabbering about 26/11Pritish Nandy  Monday November 23, 2009 The sole purpose of terrorism is to terrorise us. It is to create fear, gut wrenching fear, and spread panic everywhere. If terrorists can’t get that right, if they can’t whip up enough fear and hysteria, their entire purpose is defeated. All the bloodshed, all the deaths add up to nothing and people forget the tragedy as quickly as they forget a bus falling into a ravine or a train toppling over at high speed. The statistics of death don’t scare us any more. What scares us is the way it happened. That’s the difference between an accident, an Act of God, and a terrorist strike, though some fanatics would like us to believe that a terrorist strike is an Act of God. It is not. It is just another criminal act, plotted and planned by criminals, and often executed by some foolish, misled young men who are angry with life and society. There was a time, when I would have added the word poor to describe them. No longer. The kind of people who plot, plan and execute terror acts are no more poor, illiterate, foolish people who have been misguided by criminals masquerading as religious or political leaders. As Kasab told the courts, he was sold off to the Lashkar by his father when he was a kid. He grew up indoctrinated.  Today’s terrorists are a different lot altogether. They are smart, educated, well brought up young men and women who have wilfully taken to terrorism to fight for what they see as their cause. To defeat them is not easy and, as time goes on, it will become even more difficult because they are no longer people you can easily recognise or would even suspect as potential terrorists. Many of them are white. Some come from affluent Western families. No, they are no longer recruited from poor, third world nations. Terrorists come today dressed in Armani suits, flaunting Ivy League badges. Surprise is their secret weapon. That’s how their first axiom is best served, to spread gut wrenching fear. That’s what gets them the headlines.  Headlines are what terrorists die for. Headlines and non-stop television coverage. That’s why 9/11 was such a great success for them. That’s why 12/10 in Bali, 7/7 in London, 26/11 in Mumbai were such famous strikes. The recent bomb blasts in Peshawar and Rawalpindi are no match. They were just messages to the ISI from their former protégés, to warn the Pakistan establishment that they won’t let them rest in peace as long as they play surrogate to the US army in return for billions of dollars in aid. It’s never easy to pull back the demons you unleash. Yes, people are dying in these terror attacks. There’s lots of bloodshed. Women, children, ordinary people are getting drawn into this tragic vortex of violence. But none of this is as important as headlines. Headlines create fear, panic, terror. For terrorists, headlines are everything.  So every time we revive memories of 26/11, show hours and hours of TV coverage, write long scary articles on how terrorism has destroyed our lives and liberties, we are actually encouraging the terrorists, helping them build their superstructure of fear. Terrorists do not need to celebrate the success of 9/11 or 26/11. We are doing it for them, even as we weep for the victims and tell the world that we are better prepared to face future strikes. Let’s not kid ourselves. Terrorism is the scourge of our times and no Government, no police force is ever adequately equipped to anticipate it. The more we talk about the pain, the horror, the memories of these terrible events, the more the perpetrators celebrate, the more they go down in history as villains or heroes, depending on who is providing the perspective, and to whom. In the wilds of tribal Pakistan where the Taliban is schooling its recruits, Kasab is a hero and his dead colleagues, martyrs to the Cause. It’s important, therefore, to treat such anniversaries with caution and circumspection. We don’t really need to overload the nation with cardiac stress. 26/11 was a terrible tragedy and also a moment of amazing heroism. We lost some of our finest policemen and many innocent people who had no reason to die. But our future lies not in recalling its memories and reassuring the rascals who perpetrated it that they had struck home and caused us unforgettable pain. It’s no use crying over our failures, our mistakes. It’s important to be prepared for the future, as prepared as we can possibly be, but it’s even more critical to move on with our lives, show the world we are not afraid. Terrorism may hurt us but it cannot break our spirit, our resolve. Therein lies our courage, our wisdom as a nation.  And therein lies defeat for those who use terrorism as their weapon.

read more click this IS ISRAEL JUST A BASTARD NATION AMONG NATIONS? 

THE INFLATED HOLOCAUST STORY

November 23, 2009 The sole purpose of terrorism is to terrorise us. It is to create fear, gut wrenching fear, and spread panic everywhere. If terrorists can’t get that right, if they can’t whip up enough fear and hysteria, their entire purpose is defeated. All the bloodshed, all the deaths add up to nothing and people forget the tragedy as quickly as they forget a bus falling into a ravine or a train toppling over at high speed. The statistics of death don’t scare us any more. What scares us is the way it happened. That’s the difference between an accident, an Act of God, and a terrorist strike, though some fanatics would like us to believe that a terrorist strike is an Act of God. It is not. It is just another criminal act, plotted and planned by criminals, and often executed by some foolish, misled young men who are angry with life and society. There was a time, when I would have added the word poor to describe them. No longer. The kind of people who plot, plan and execute terror acts are no more poor, illiterate, foolish people who have been misguided by criminals masquerading as religious or political leaders. As Kasab told the courts, he was sold off to the Lashkar by his father when he was a kid. He grew up indoctrinated.  Today’s terrorists are a different lot altogether. They are smart, educated, well brought up young men and women who have wilfully taken to terrorism to fight for what they see as their cause. To defeat them is not easy and, as time goes on, it will become even more difficult because they are no longer people you can easily recognise or would even suspect as potential terrorists. Many of them are white. Some come from affluent Western families. No, they are no longer recruited from poor, third world nations. Terrorists come today dressed in Armani suits, flaunting Ivy League badges. Surprise is their secret weapon. That’s how their first axiom is best served, to spread gut wrenching fear. That’s what gets them the headlines.  Headlines are what terrorists die for. Headlines and non-stop television coverage. That’s why 9/11 was such a great success for them. That’s why 12/10 in Bali, 7/7 in London, 26/11 in Mumbai were such famous strikes. The recent bomb blasts in Peshawar and Rawalpindi are no match. They were just messages to the ISI from their former protégés, to warn the Pakistan establishment that they won’t let them rest in peace as long as they play surrogate to the US army in return for billions of dollars in aid. It’s never easy to pull back the demons you unleash. Yes, people are dying in these terror attacks. There’s lots of bloodshed. Women, children, ordinary people are getting drawn into this tragic vortex of violence. But none of this is as important as headlines. Headlines create fear, panic, terror. For terrorists, headlines are everything.  So every time we revive memories of 26/11, show hours and hours of TV coverage, write long scary articles on how terrorism has destroyed our lives and liberties, we are actually encouraging the terrorists, helping them build their superstructure of fear. Terrorists do not need to celebrate the success of 9/11 or 26/11. We are doing it for them, even as we weep for the victims and tell the world that we are better prepared to face future strikes. Let’s not kid ourselves. Terrorism is the scourge of our times and no Government, no police force is ever adequately equipped to anticipate it. The more we talk about the pain, the horror, the memories of these terrible events, the more the perpetrators celebrate, the more they go down in history as villains or heroes, depending on who is providing the perspective, and to whom. In the wilds of tribal Pakistan where the Taliban is schooling its recruits, Kasab is a hero and his dead colleagues, martyrs to the Cause. It’s important, therefore, to treat such anniversaries with caution and circumspection. We don’t really need to overload the nation with cardiac stress. 26/11 was a terrible tragedy and also a moment of amazing heroism. We lost some of our finest policemen and many innocent people who had no reason to die. But our future lies not in recalling its memories and reassuring the rascals who perpetrated it that they had struck home and caused us unforgettable pain. It’s no use crying over our failures, our mistakes. It’s important to be prepared for the future, as prepared as we can possibly be, but it’s even more critical to move on with our lives, show the world we are not afraid. Terrorism may hurt us but it cannot break our spirit, our resolve. Therein lies our courage, our wisdom as a nation.  And therein lies defeat for those who use terrorism as their weapon.

Amnesty International (AI) 2008 report on issues within

The reason for the carnage against Christians is because the Dalits have converted to Christianity and Hindu fundamentalists want to keep the Dalits as Untouchables and within the caste system.

Sudra Holocaust: Genocide of 1 million Dalits in India since 1947: About three million Dalit women have been raped and around one million Dalits killed from the time of Independence. This is 25 times more than number of soldiers killed during the wars fought after independence. That is why Dalits do not need Aryan culture or Hindu Dharma based on caste any more. …” [Dr. Tulsiram]

Fear and fundamentalism in India

In the Indian state of Orissa, Chris Morris finds communities in shock following a wave of anti-Christian violence, which has forced thousands to flee.

Church destroyed in the recent anti-Christian violence
Two hundred churches and prayer houses have been destroyed

They call Bhubaneshwar India’s temple city.

Over two millennia, thousands of intricately carved Hindu temples have been constructed in Orissa’s state capital.

Many of them still stand testimony to the faith of the people. They are often places of serenity and calm.

But travel for five hours into the interior, into the lush green hills of central Orissa, and Hinduism takes on a new and more menacing form.

In the remote district of Khandamal, fundamentalists have been at work.

Militant groups who say they speak in the name of Hinduism, have been burning Bibles and killing Christians.

Mob rule

Horror stories have emerged from the worst anti-Christian pogroms since Indian independence.

At one of the many relief camps dotted around the region, I was told of a man named Parikkit Nayak, who escaped from the initial surge of violence.

Across Khandamal tens of thousands of Christians are now living in fear

Two days later as he tried to flee from his village with his wife and two children, he was caught by a local mob.

They tied a rope around his neck and dragged him along the ground for 400m (1,312ft).

Bruised and battered, he was then paraded through the village like an animal and asked if he would renounce Christianity. When he said no, he was cut to pieces with knives, while his young family had to look on.

Deserted villages

Across Khandamal tens of thousands of Christians are now living in fear.

A destroyed house
For many, returning to their homes is too dangerous

Many have moved into camps set up by the government, with armed guards at the gate.

Others are living in the shadows, spending the nights hidden in the forest before venturing back to deserted villages during the day.

In one such village, littered with empty, burnt-out houses, we were speaking to a nervous elderly woman, when the sound of a conch shell being blown echoed through the trees.

“They’re coming,” she cried. “You must leave now.”

She pushed us away, picked up the folds of her dirty blue sari, and ran for her life.

Intimidation and terror

For others, returning to their village is still too dangerous.

I met a young priest named Manoj, now in temporary exile, who related the story of his father.

“They came to our house and held an axe to his neck. ‘If you stay Christian’, he was told, ‘you will be killed.’ He was taken to a local temple and forced to convert.”

“To live in this world today,” Manoj’s father relates in a letter smuggled out of his village, “we have to live as Hindus.”

Hindu activists talk of retaliation for a Christian campaign to convert poor Hindu villagers

Part of this organised campaign of intimidation and terror has been the destruction of local churches and prayer houses.

More than 200 have been attacked and burnt.

Some of them now have saffron Hindu flags flying above desecrated altars and broken roofs. A sign of conquest.

‘Retaliation’

As we walked through one abandoned house, a Hindu couple from the neighbouring village appeared.

Religious painting covered in broken glass
Christians make up 2.5% of India’s 1.1 billion population

There was no hostility here, only a sense of regret as they looked at half-burnt photographs in broken frames – the faces of the people who used to live here.

“There’s not much we can do to help, but we never had any problem with them,” the woman said. “This was the work of extremists.”

Why is it happening? As ever, it depends on who you ask.

Hindu activists talk of retaliation for a Christian “campaign” to convert poor Hindu villagers.

Others speak of complex caste and tribal rivalries in one of India’s most backward and isolated places.

“The cake has several layers,” says the government representative in Khandamal, Kishan Kumar.

“There’s a tribal layer, and there’s a layer of economic rivalry. But the icing on top of the cake is organised religious violence. And that’s what we’ve seen here.”

Belatedly, the central government has acted against the instigators.

Map of India showing Khandamal, Mumbia and Delhi

Hundreds of people have been arrested, and there have been calls for a nationwide ban on groups such as the Bajrang Dal, the self-styled warriors of militant Hindu nationalism.

There is a strong suspicion that the brutality in Khandamal, and a series of attacks against churches elsewhere in India, is part of a deliberate political plan to stoke communal tensions before a general election next year.

The immediate trigger for the violence may have been the murder of a controversial Hindu leader, for which Maoist rebels have claimed responsibility.

But the finger of blame was pointed at the Christian community and the mobs unleashed their savage response.

So Khandamal is now watching and waiting, awash with stories and people who want to tell them.

In hiding

Late at night we sat with one young woman who has been hidden for her own protection.

A Hindu woman in hiding after she was raped
Some Hindus have also been attacked if they have Christian relatives

Even though she herself is a Hindu, she was gang-raped by her grandparents’ neighbours because her uncle refused to renounce his Christian beliefs.

As a nun held her by the hand, she choked back tears and looked up.

“Why did they do this to me?” she asked. “For what?”

“They’re threatening to kill all of us – me, my uncle, my brothers.”

“But we won’t lie about it. Even if they throw money at our feet, we will continue to tell the truth.”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7672228.stm

Isha Khan bdmailer@gmail.com

  1. It may surprise many, but the are of highest concern is not Kashmir, but the rising tide of communalism, Anti-Christian, Anti-Dalit, and Anti-Muslim. The Naxalite insurrection led by Dalits and Maoists that comprises more than 40% of the landmass of the country.Three major groups – Maoist Communist Centre, People’s War Group and CPI (ML) – have merged to form a united outfit called CPI (Maoist). It affirmed: The revolution will be carried out and completed through armed agrarian revolutionary war; that is, protracted people’s war with the armed seizure of power remaining as its central and principal task, encircling the cities from the countryside and thereby finally capturing them.”
  2. Kashmir was concerned as the biggest threat to the country’s unity but in recent years, many in New Delhi thought that they had swollowed Srinagar. Kashmir is in fever pitch. This year’s insrurrection caught them by sruprise. the Divide between Jammu and Kashmir now is irrerable and even the puppet Farooq Abdullah who sold his soul to Delhi for a few Dollars and a title, says “Kashmir will go on a platter to Pakistan.”
  3. The third are of security conern for New Delhi is open rebellion in the Northeast. These insurections do not make it to the daily headlines on CNN, but the fact is the New Delhi has very little control of Assam and the seven sisters that lie East of Bangadesh. Even Chinese occupied territory mislabeled “Aranchal Pradesh” has a huge body of rebels that want nothing to do with Delhi.
  4. Communalism is a big threat to the so called “secular” country. Brahmans in Jammu in 2008 led a boycott of Kashmir forcing the Kashmiris to strive to trade directly with Pakistan. Church burning in Orissa are problem exacerbated by the sepratists who strive for freedom from Delhi. The Gujarits Hinduvata massacred 3000 Muslims and hundreds of thousands are scared to goback to their homes.

ALSO SEE

Hindu Fascist Violence Against Christians
India: Genocide Nation
Can A Pakistani 7-year-old Say ‘Hindu Kutta’?

     

    Do you think Indian Government should take quick and serious steps to stop terrorism and genocide against the minorities living in India?
    Yes
    No
    Dont konw

Posted by TAXIDRIVER

November 25, 2009

Nazim, Deepak, Dinesh, Suresh, ASP Muniandy,Ambalabalan should all be charged for conspiracy to withhold information regarding a murder case,

Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 12:25 am

MAKE REPORT AGAINST UMNO IN MALAYSIA YOU ARE A CRIMINAL THE POLICE ACTIONS ARE SO OUTRAGEOUS

RELATED ARTICLE
IN MALAYSIA the police actions are so outrageous.
The attenuation requirement that Roberts included in his ruling – that it can’t be the cop right there doing the arresting who “makes a mistake – oops!” – for this exception to the rule to apply is what makes it the right balancing test. Remember, the mistake made in Herring was made by someone not connected with the bust, some time earlier, in a police database. Frankly, if the police really want to get around the rule and are willing to lie, there are already far easier ways than to have someone start making attenuated mistakes – mistakes at far remove from the defendant – in the hopes that something gets triggered down the line.
The UK doesn’t even have a written constitution. It does not protect speech like the U.S. and has a more invasive police state. Please don’t use it as a model for us
read this fullstory click here Make report against UMNO IN MALAYSIA you are a criminal the police actions are so outrageous
Despite the outcome of this expose in the near future being not very encouraging, take heart, cos even kids are well versed with the ultimate outcome of Najis.

Meanwhile, to Bala: Stay safe, cos you seemed a marked man now.

    BFM: Why are you avoiding me now? Last night I call you 3 times and you never return my call!
DeFcuk: No lah darling, actually I am busy. You know, this Hari Raya Haji is approaching and I have to deliver many carpets to the Tan Sris and Datuks residence day and night. Furthermore, I thought you are angry with me. . ., now that you know I have not paid that Bala the full amount.

DeFcuk was sitting sheepishly like a naughty school boy behind his desk with BFM standing from across the desk. DeFcuk was trying to avoid having eye-contact with BFM and he was hoping that the “fat cow” would leave as soon as possible.

BFM: Oh, DeFcuk, DeFcuk. . ., how can I be angry with you?. . .the light of my life, the fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. . .!

Instantly, DeFcuk grins from ear to ear upon hearing what BFM just said. Nevertheless, he was hoping it was Ashwira Rai and not BFM that was standing across the desk.

Mattress Carrier Head Office

Sergeant: Boss! It is now approaching December. We still do not know where about is RPK? What should we do now?

Mattress Carrier: Did Interpol reply to our request?

Sergeant: Yes boss, but they say they are not concern of political refugee escaping prosecution from a tyrant regime. They will only pursue on such cases of organized crime, crimes against humanity, terrorism, illicit drug trafficking, human trafficking, money laundering, and corruption. However, they told us they had already drawn up a list of Malaysians suspected of money laundering and corruption. . ., and RPK was not in the list!

Mattress Carrier: Well than, who are those Malaysians in their money laundering and corruption list?

Sergeant: Sorry boss, they are not revealing it to us, lest it will jeopardize their investigation. But they told us some of them are political leaders from the UMNO-BN. They say they are monitoring some accounts in the Bahamas, Cayman, Panama, Paris and Switzerland.

Mattress Carrier: Paris? Why Paris?

The sergeant looking puzzled: “Beats me, Boss! But I guess they thought most of the money has not left the French shores”.

Mattress Carrier, wiping his sweaty forehead with a white handkerchief: Damn! I must report this to Jibby!

To be continued. . .!

(The above short story is purely fiction and has nothing to do with the living or the dead. If there are any similarities with the name of persons or places, it is just a mere coincident).

    written by justice, November 25, 2009 11:42:38


    The point about the affairs is Foreigners and self-interested parties within our borders with access to CIA/KGB/Chinese spy agencies, can bring great threat to our national interest. Najib is disqualified from holding the office given such a possibility..
      Being the Prime Minister of the country, he has at his disposal the full weight of the law behind him to defend and exonerate himself from allegation of his involvement in the murder of Altantuya, the Mongolian model.
    Giving countless press conferences to claim that the opposition parties are desperately attempting an evil plot to fabricate lies against him doesnt clear him of his reputation and integrity unless he takes legal action to refute such allegation.

    How can a Prime Minister continues to govern the country with such implacable reputation which could have wide damaging repercussion to the country’s well-being. In Singapore, any allegation of wrong-doing by any minister of senior civil servant would be subjected to lawsuits to refute such accusation.

    How can a Prime Minister continues to disregard the sensitivity of the nation’s pride and honour which has world-wide reminiscence?
    have

    The attenuation requirement that Roberts included in his ruling – that it can’t be the cop right there doing the arresting who “makes a mistake – oops!” – for this exception to the rule to apply is what makes it the right balancing test. Remember, the mistake made in Herring was made by someone not connected with the bust, some time earlier, in a police database. Frankly, if the police really want to get around the rule and are willing to lie, there are already far easier ways than to have someone start making attenuated mistakes – mistakes at far remove from the defendant – in the hopes that something gets triggered down the line.The UK doesn’t even have a written constitution. It does not protect speech like the U.S. and has a more invasive police state. Please don’t use it as a model for usread this fullstory click here Make report against UMNO IN MALAYSIA you are a criminal the police actions are so outrageous

    November 24, 2009

    THE MOST ARROGANT BASTARD OF The Mahathir era IN MALAYSIA The Quran says, God will not change the condition of a people, ’till they change themselves

    Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 1:27 pm

     

    we do not ask for free food on our table. But we as tax player, we pay tax and hence demand goods to be delivered. I do not think this demand is too much. At the same time, we are customer of our government. I think it is not so polite to ask their customer to shut up when they have not delivered good service.Observe most of the ministers especially when they are in an aggressive mood. Do they behave like elected representatives who are working for the people? NO. They talk down on us as if we don’t know any better. It’s like we owe them a living and not the other way round. Let’s have freedom and liberty…and food and drinks all round!Idealism of democracy does not augur well for current ruling party. Empowering people to think & liberating their minds is the last thing BN wants to do.

    Freedom is self endowed by our creator, its the ruling class which suppresses us. Islam teaches man to liberate himself from all form of oppresion and to teach his fellow man to think, feel & act in benovelance towards his fellow man.

    The ruling politicians still have the mentality of society owes them some gratitude for the development they have brought using our money, coupled with the belief of certain parties that Malaysia is their right to rule.

    The more oppresion they conduct the more despicable they become. Soon they will perish

    We differ in many ways but we do agree in many things. I believe Zaidel is right although his assumption is flawed. Generally under Maslow theory in Behavioural Science, Man basic instinct is food and shelter before he could think of anything else like freedom and arts. So most farmers poor would always thought about food and shelter and for their love ones and for you to make assumption that Man is predispose to freedom of expression is wrong. Freedom of expressions or actions is manifest in many ways, for me, Man has the habit of building walls where there enjoy this freedom within. I came from a big family thus I have to create my own space for my privacy which again is part and parcel of human needs and rights! So as long as Man can find the freedom within their own 4 walls I think all is fine! So as long as the government of the day does not intrude in his private affairs he will enjoy his freedom of expression by himself and family. That is the reason why I am against Islamic private laws that infringe on personal rights as oppose to public rights. Democracy per say is good but for man to achieve the benefit of democratic freedom man must have the ability to ascertain, respect and understand other people’s right and to honour them. To argue and discourse without using fist but that in Malaysia and many Asian countries especially Islamic one is a rarity. For many of us violence is the result and rule of law is forgotten.

    We have been independent for more than 50 years but we seem to lose the art to argue by not getting emotional about it. Our former leaders would argue but always level headedness wins the day. If any leaders who would resort to fistfights would be banish, please do read about Aziz Ishak and how he was banish from UMNO. He to me was like Zulkifli Noordin whom I believe you too despised. I was lucky that I grew up living in many places in Malaysia. I remember staying in PJ and in Jalan Kelantan KL, in Terengganu I stay at Jalan Dato Amar, Batu Buruk , in Penang in air Itam and later Green Lane. Each places accord me the perspective of living among Malaysians and Malays of which I am. From the ultra sophisticate malay like you to those the have nots in Terengganu(before the discovery of oil) and the second class citizen of the Malays in Penang. I am affectionately fond of Penang because of the cosmopolitan view it has. There the Malays are divided between the jawi Peranakans and Malays, now sadly residing in greater numbers in Balik Pulau and Butterworth. Orang Depa and orang kita rings my ear when the mamak describe them and us to me as though these Malays were of lower class. It pains me and it also tickles the hell out of me. These Mamak whose UMNO branches in Pitt Street are conducted in Tamil amuses me because between them there is the dark one and the northern Indian Mamaks.

     

    Human beings are born free. The moment he comes out from the womb, he is freed from the constraints of the womb and thrust into this world a free human being. The first thing which he tastes, apart from the air which he inhales, is freedom and not food or drink.

     

    Freedom of expression is tasted early in his life outside the womb. The first cry which a human being give is an expression, which he is then free to demonstrate. And he moves, his eyes opening up, his limbs moving in no particular pattern and without any specific control. Freedom and liberty are not only what which dignify us as human beings but they are our divine rights.

     

    Zaidel talks of the poor and impoverished farmers in India. What if all the hardworking and starving farmers in India, or elsewhere, were locked up in a cage and fed food and drink to their heart’s content but they were not allowed to speak nor go anywhere at all? Then they are given the choice of leaving the cage, live freely and find their own food and drink. Wouldn’t they leave the cage? I think they would. But of course, like Zaidel, I would be making an assumption.

     

    However, in this day and age, when freedom and liberty are regarded as universal rights of human beings and when they are regarded as part of natural and divine rights, it is a measure of the sorry state that we are in that we are still arguing which is the more basic and primordial need, food and drink or freedom and liberty!

     

    My question is, why can’t we have them all? Especially in a democracy, where we elect our so called leaders to look after our well being as members of a State?

     

    I think in this day and age, it is downright insulting — and not to mention, pathetic — for any leader to say to the people that I will give you food on your table in abundance but you would have to shut up, toe the line and do as I say, all the time and under all circumstances.

     

    For a leader to lay the blame on the people which he or she ruled — for not understanding the limits of democracy — as a reason for his or her failure to achieve development and progress does not speak much of his or her leadership.

     

    A comparison was made with Singapore in one of the comments. It was pointed out Singapore did not have much of a democracy and they progress well. But that does not prove that Singapore progressed well because it was less democratic.

     

    Hasn’t it occurred to any of us that Singapore progressed because of the mentality and work ethics of its leaders?

     

    By the way, Malaysia, during the 22 year reign of DrM had identical benevolent absolutist regime with Singapore. Both Dr M and LKY were the staunchest apologists for what they termed as “Asian values”, which to me was nothing more than a self serving excuse for totalitarianism.

     

    Malaysia had everything which Singapore had in terms of repressive legislation as well as actions. In fact history would show that Malaysia imposed more limits to democracy than Singapore did in the 22 years of Dr M’s rule.

     

    So I am going to ask the obvious question. Why is it that Malaysia had failed to match Singapore’s progress and development during those 22 years? Both had untold limits on democracy. What happened? What were the differences between the two countries?

     

    The thing is this. If we stripped all the deliberate cost overruns (I am being overly generous with my description here); all consultation, introduction and service fees; all middle men; all other “value-not-added services” from all of our projects all those years, I am sure this country would have enough finances and resources to do much more. The money being churned by Petronas alone would be more than enough.

     

    And if only we had put in the right people — instead of some silver-spoon fed children, brothers in law, nephews and what-have-you of the people in power — here they were needed, I am sure this country would have equalled Singapore, if not overtaken it.

     

    Whether we like it or not, we are a democratic country. Our leaders should stop asking for more and more powers and start delivering results with whatever powers they already have. Why can’t development and progress be achieved without trampling on the people’s freedom and liberty?

     

    In this cyber age, the people are slowly being empowered. And they wish for emancipation. They wish for development and progress. And they do not wish to give more than they need to, particularly when it comes to their rights, freedom and liberty.

     

    The people now have become an enlightened customers of the politicians. And they have become demanding customers. They want food and drink on their table. And they want their freedom and their liberties in the same breath. Their basic and fundamental rights as human beings. Those very things which give them human dignity and which differentiate them from other animals.

     

    The times they are a-changin, says Bob Dylan, and you’d better start swimming or you’d sink like a stone.

    This blog is an appeal to you to be the judge in one of the most horrific and savage cases of child murder ever recorded.

    Art Harun describes himself as a non-governmental organism, intent on infecting the conscience.

    Here are the details which were forwarded to me by e-mail. Please read the narration carefully, though it will sicken you to the core of your being, as it did me.”Do you remember February 1993 in England, when a young boy of three was taken from a Liverpool shopping centre by two 10-year-old boys? James Bulger walked away from his mother for only a second, Jon Venables took his hand and led him out of the mall with his friend Robert Thompson. They took James on a walk for over 2 and half miles, along the way stopping every now and again to torture the poor little boy who was crying constantly for his mummy.”Finally they stopped at a railway track where they brutally kicked him, threw stones at him, rubbed paint in his eyes, pushed batteries up his anus and cut his fingers off with scissors. Other mutilations were inflicted but not reported in the press.

    and this is  the barisan  sin to the voters who help to keep them in power

    “N.B: Remember, a 3-year-old cannot possibly defend himself against a 10-year-old, let alone two of them.

    “What these two boys did was so horrendous that James mother was forbidden to identify his body. They then left his beaten small body on railway tracks so a train could run him over to hide the mess they had created. These two boys, even being boys, understood what they did was wrong, hence trying to make it look like an accident.

    “This week Lady Justice Butler-Sloss has awarded the two boys (now men), anonymity for the rest of their lives when they leave custody with new identities. They will also leave custody early only serving just over half of their sentence. They are being relocated to Australia to live out the rest of their lives. They disgustingly and violently took James life away and in return they get a new life!

    “Please… if you feel as strongly as we do (and if you haven’t already signed this petition) that this is a grave miscarriage of justice – hit the forward button and add your name at the end, and send it to everyone you can!

    “If you are the 700th person to sign, please forward this e-mail to:cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk and mark it for the attention to Lady Justice Butler-Sloss. Then continue until it hits 1,400, before you e-mail her the list again.

    “There is power in numbers and these petitions do help. Maybe it’ll prevent another child from a violent death and maybe it’ll get greater, more appropriate convictions for these criminals whatever their age. Please take a few seconds to forward it to your mail list and don’t forget to add your name to the list.

    Thank you.”

    Now you be the judge.

    AUSTINKOSONG SON OF SCATTERBRAIN–The deceptive Judge INDEPENDENCE,IMPARTIALITY ,INTEGRITY ,EQUALITY ,COMPETENCE AND DILIGENC HE PRICE IT $$ per kilo

    Can’t we just charge them for sodomy instead? I want to hear a sodomy case. Judges become famous when they hear sodomy cases, not cases involving cow’s heads.
    We can’t, your honour. There is no sodomy involved here.
    I’m sure if the police investigate properly they will find someone who has been sodomised.
    Well, your honour, I think Umno has been sodomised.
    There you are. So there is sodomy involved. Can we amend the charges to sodomy against Umno instead?
    But your honour, Umno was not literally sodomised. It’s more like figure of speech sodomised. Umno was sodomised politically.
    Anwar Ibrahim did not literally sodomise anyone either. He sort of politically sodomised Dr Mahathir Mohamad. But that did not stop the government from charging him and finding him guilty of sodomy. Why can’t these six be charged for sodomy, for politically sodomising Umno? I want to hear a sodomy case.
    For this particular case we can’t, your honour. But maybe we can give you another sodomy case to hear. Tiong King Sing just sodomised Ong Tee Keat by revealing the details of the RM10 million cash donation. It is now public knowledge and there is even a Statutory Declaration floating around.
    Fantastic. Make sure that that case comes to my court. Where did the crime occur?
    In Petaling Jaya, your honour.
    Ah, then that comes under my court’s jurisdiction. Okay, let us proceed with this sedition case then. Are there any witnesses involved? How many witnesses are going to be called and how many days will we need for this case?
    Initially, there were some videos of the crime.
    Are the videos going to be entered as evidence? Then the accused might as well just plead guilty and save the court’s time. If there are videos then they have no defence.
    The videos were available, your honour. But now the MCMC has asked Malaysiakini to remove the videos under threat. So the videos are no longer available.
    So the evidence no longer exists?
    No, your honour.
    If there is no longer any evidence why waste the court’s time with a trial? Just drop the charges.
    We can’t, your honour. We have to make the Hindus happy by at least pretending that we are putting the six on trial and then later either drop the charges or find them not guilty due to lack of video evidence.
    Why later? Why not now?
    We can’t, your honour. There is a by-election coming up soon in Port Dickson and there are about 20% Hindu voters there. This will make the Hindu voters very unhappy. We can only drop the charges after Umno wins the by-election. If not Umno is going to be sodomised good and proper.
    Ah, if Umno loses the by-election can’t we then change the charge to sodomy since Umno was sodomised in the by-election?
    Umno can’t lose the by-election, your honour.
    Why not?
    Because there are more than 5,000 postal voters in a total of only 14,000 registered voters.
    I see. So the opposition is going to be sodomised instead then.
    Sort of, your honour.
    And these six people being charged are also opposition members?
    They are, your honour.
    I always said Anwar Ibrahim’s people are troublemakers. All opposition people are troublemakers. I have already decided to find them guilty even before the trial starts.
    These six are not Anwar Ibrahim’s people, your honour.
    You said they are opposition supporters.
    They are Umno supporters, your honour.
    But you said they are opposition supporters.
    Yes, your honour. Umno is the opposition in Selangor.

    Should these two murderers, who committed a crime of literally unspeakable brutality against a defenceless child who was little more than a baby, have been let out of jail, given new identities and sent out to Australia, where there is no surety that they will not commit atrocities in future?

    Is it fair on the parents of the murdered child to know that their little son’s killers and torturers have been set free – and in effect been forgiven by society – after 16 years in detention?

    Or do you feel that forgiveness and consequent redemption for even the most demoniacal of crimes are not only possible but indeed a moral necessity if we are to reclaim our sense of our own humanity that such inhuman acts make us question?

    You be the judge. Not only for the sake of the brutally butchered boy and his family, but in a sense for all of us who claim to be human.

    How can people do such unimaginably evil things? Can human beings do such evil and still be human in our eyes, deserving of forgiveness and redemption as all humans must be in order to be humans?


    THE MOST POWEFULMAN IN MALAYSIA BY THE TAXIDRIVER FORhttp://themalaysiantribune-taxidriver.blogspot.com

    Dr Mahathir and gang have undone all the supposedly good things he had done when he went after Anwar. Even for the die-hard skeptics, the first trial was enough to know that he was the one manifestly in error. However, Najib and Badawi strengthened the public’s opinion, and in fact the world’s opinion as well, when Saiful was thrust into the government orgy thereby obliterating all doubt and those confused.Dr. M had turned his dream on its head yet to all who thought that the opportunity had arrived to fill the political gaps through Anwar persecutions and the late Honorable Fadil Noor’s departure seems to be in constant tumble on every hurdle. None is spared, not even under the pretense of Dialogue; one simply cannot sly his/her way into extending any form of life to the current administrators’ Palace or Cabinet.
    Dr. M really understood what he had done to the country when he chose a coward such as Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to fill the gap where he so screwed up when he violently and illegally removed Anwar Ibrahim from office. Dr. M, I’ve to hand it to you – you really messed upBodowi should have protected the Dato Ramli Yusuf but he didn’t! He is just another idiotic guy lah! On the outside, he looks like a Mr. Clean but he is really not. One of my friend’s working in IJM Corp said that the last few days before Bodowi stepped down, he called the CEO of IJM Corp himself and asked for favours with contracts! So, there you go! Mr. Clean Bodowi my foot! He’s just as corrupted as the rest of the bloody umno gang! Bodowi celaka! Penipu rakyat!
    It is not the agung or the rakyat or UMNO who chooses the PM in Malaysia. It is the IGP. Polis Raja Di Malaysia.
    Maybe even the next chief of gangsters (kogsi gelap) in Malaysia also need the approval of the IGP. Those who don’t pay homage, gets killed like the mamak gang.IGP should be in possession of important dossier info pertaining to the crimes committed by TDM, TAAB and of course C4 guy, so how to get rid of hIsnfo/knowledge is power.This IGP Scoundrel has a dossier on every influential politician up there, ready to be made public, so who dares to get rid of this stain on Malaysian society, Of course he has all of the eating quietly out of his diseased jaundiced hands. Have you heard of Michael Jackson’s song “They don’t really care about us” Many thought he was being anti-Semitic, but actually he was telling people the world over that their so-called governments and politicians don’t really care about the people. So we shall have to take our fates into our own hands and make sure no one, but No One has the power to take our rights away ! Therefore, we need to overthrow this Barisan Najis Govt. and get a fresh Govt. in and with 2/3 majority so we can put in place safeguards for a True Civil Society The IGP protects his masters even if his masters are monsters. It’s not his pistol that evokes fear. The thought of him serving his masters for another 50 years under BN rule , instead of protecting the ordinary rakyat, is sending shivers down my spine
    In Malaysia, politicking rids the lesser evil and maintain the worst evil untouched. Simply because the worst evil means more $$, more power and more vested interests to preserve and protect. The whole Nation knows it and the rakyat knows it. You do not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

     

     

    What’s your judgment?

    Art Harun describes himself as a non-governmental organism, intent on infecting the conscience.
    Art Harun

    THE KHINZIR TOYOL ON LOOSE

    theSEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE video is in bad taste. I mean, how can we make fun of Teoh Beng Hock’s death when we should instead be mourning him?

     

    November 23, 2009

    ‘Dr M, you killed democracy in Malaysia’The hallowed halls of the judiciary were stained 20 years ago,WHAT IS ALL WORTH FOR YOU?

    Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 10:38 pm

     

    ‘That is your legacy You silenced the voices of dissent in no uncertain terms. And in the end, the monsters your created devoured you in the process.’

    Dr M on democracy and sore losers

    Suhaimi Said: Dr Mahathir Mohamad, I remember you as a dictator. Hundreds of people were detained under ISA during your rule. So don’t talk about democracy. I was a victim of your dictatorship.

    Equaliser: Dr Mahathir, you killed democracy in Malaysia – that is your legacy. We don’t need people like you anymore in this blessed country. You are a Malay nationalist, that’s all. You didn’t serve all of Malaysia’s people, which include the Chinese, Indians, and other ethnic groups.

    A statesman is one who has served his country’s people well and promoted democratic values and principles within government institutions and society as whole. You silenced voices of dissent in no uncertain terms. And in the end, the monsters your created devoured you in the process.

    Yes, you created monsters greedy for money and power, and who were willing to use any means necessary to acquire them. This country has failed to serve all its people and continues to do so. You began the trend of money politics and this is the result of your actions.

    Just watch the news daily and you can see how lop-sided the coverage is in favour of the ruling party, and this right in front of our very own eyes. If only all Malaysians would open their eyes and ears to see and listen, they would know what to do come the 13thgeneral election.

    Kris: It has been estimated that during Mahathir’s premiership, the amount of taxpayers’ money allegedly misused by him and his cronies was in the region of hundreds of billions. To carry out this, he completely destroyed the judiciary and the enforcement agencies by replacing the honest top officials in these agencies with tainted officials who could be blackmailed into doing his bidding.

    By having these people under his thumb and by controlling the media and the civil service, he ensured that he literally had dictatorial powers. To make sure that all the crooked deals that he made were not known to the public, he enacted laws like the Official Secrets Act.

    In short, he was a premier who manipulated the democratic system to give himself dictatorial powers. That is why it is extremely disgusting to hear this man pontificating on democracy or corruption.
    Playfair: It is sad but not surprising that Dr Mahathir continues to peddle half-truths to justify his opinions. He reduces democracy to a one-dimensional event – elections – and fails to refer to other equally important elements that constitute the package called democracy.

    He speaks of “sore losers”, but what about the ‘tyranny of the majority’ (which he should be all too familiar with)? A system cultivated and nourished through dubious means and made legal through a two-thirds majority and then used to subvert national institutions to do the bidding of the majority – sore losers are nothing compared to this tyranny.

    Asian values were promoted as an ideology to restrict mass political participation, good governance, transparency and accountability. The sacking of Anwar Ibrahim could not have been more un-Asian, not to mention un-Islamic, un-Malay and un-Malaysian (if Umno will allow the use of such a term).

    Please keep speaking, sir, so that we can find out how you worked your way to remain in power for so long.

    TC88: Talk about sore losers. Mahathir is probably a hypocrite. When Umno was declared illegal and Mahathir’s position as its leader and prime minister was sorely threatened, he sacked the then Lord President and the five Supreme Court (now called the Federal Court) judges when he knew the verdict was not going to be in his favour.

    Dr Mahathir, you destroyed the very fabric of Malaysia’s public institutions, its constitution, the judiciary, the enforcement agencies like the police, attorney-general, and the then ACA

    This has been highlighted by Ku Li (Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah) in his speeches. Please do the honourable thing and retire, and just keep quiet like your anointed successor, Pak Lah (Abdullah Ahmad Badawi), the Father of Malaysia’s Conscience.

     

    PRIME MINISTER MAHATHIR MOHAMAD, WHO HAS A PASSION FOR FLYING AND SAILING, MALAYSIA’S

    How Mahathir and Anwar became embroiled in a clash that threatens to send Malaysia into upheaval

     

    by Sheri Prasso and Mark Clifford in Kuala Lumpur, with Joyce Barnathan in Hong Kong.

    To Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who has a passion for flying and sailing, Malaysia’s annual air and boat show on the island of Langkawi was an event he hated to miss–even as his nation stumbled through an economic crisis. So Mahathir decided to hold the December 3, 1997, meeting of the Malaysian Cabinet on the island, instead of in the capital of Kuala Lumpur.

    But by the time he arrived at the elegant Gunung Raya hilltop retreat, Mahathir was in for a jolt. His next-in-command–Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim–had virtually concluded business without him, according to sources knowledgeable about the meeting. In what amounted to an economic coup, the cabinet had decided to adopt an austerity plan similar to those imposed on neighboring Thailand and Indonesia by the International Monetary Fund. The plan would slash public spending and halt infrastructure projects championed by Mahathir.

    The new policy was a stunning rebuke to Mahathir. Since the onset of the Asian crisis five months earlier, he had been railing against a perceived Western conspiracy and insisting Malaysia could maintain its breakneck growth. Mahathir’s reaction: He humbly agreed to go along with his Cabinet’s decision–but on the very next day undermined it by announcing Malaysia would proceed with a controversial $2.7 billion rail and pipeline project. Alarmed investors immediately sent the ringgit to a new low.

    Those intrigue-filled days in December were a prelude to what has become Malaysia’s worst political crisis in nearly three decades. Although Mahathir and Anwar had long had differences over economic stewardship and management of political spoils, that rift widened as Asia’s financial crisis wore on and the two leaders worked increasingly at cross purposes. Ultimately, the dispute led Mahathir to clamp controls on the currency and jail his deputy, casting himself as an international rogue.

    Today, the clash threatens to send Malaysia into upheaval. Anwar, a central player in the old patronage system, has now emerged as a hero of the swelling reformasi movement, which advocates a more open society and economy. He goes on trial November 2 on 10 charges of sodomy and corruption. A conviction could turn the protests into an ugly confrontation.

    How did the two men end up so militantly opposed to each other? Over the past month, BUSINESS WEEK interviewed dozens of Malaysians from both camps, including Anwar prior to his arrest, prominent pro-Mahathir businessmen, informed academics, and Anwar associates. Together, they draw portraits of the one-time allies and their battle to control the future of Malaysia Inc., an economic model that uses patronage to speed economic development.

    HEIR APPARENT. It is a tragic spectacle. Just a few years ago, Mahathir was poised to retire from politics as the prickly but nonetheless brilliant and erudite architect of a model developing nation. And Anwar, the anointed successor, would smoothly take the helm of the ruling United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and lead a modern, politically stable 21st-century economy. Former Islamic radical Anwar, 51, was the more Western-friendly of the two, often quoting Shakespeare and hobnobbing with the moguls of international finance. Mahathir, 72, has long taken a confrontational stance toward the West. But like Anwar, he viewed foreign investment as key to Malaysia’s economy and advocated freer trade within Asia.

    Both also were savvy politicians who steered choice deals to their allies in the business community. Just last year, foreign investors criticized the government’s handling of insider deals by Malaysian Resources Corp., a media and infrastructure company controlled by Anwar allies.

    Still, Anwar had a reform agenda. In recent years, he increasingly advocated the rule of law and more transparency. But until the crisis erupted, he was willing to bide his time until it was his turn to run the country. ”He was that close to power,” says Anwar’s wife, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, holding her thumb and forefinger close together. ”He was tolerating a lot.”

    Perhaps the key difference between the two leaders was their outlook on the world. Anwar quickly realized that the meltdowns of Thailand and Indonesia were caused by excessive borrowing, overbuilding, and big trade imbalances–and that Malaysia’s situation was similar. Malaysia didn’t yet need an IMF bailout, but he feared its economy would implode without swift action. While this surely would hurt his business allies, Anwar was willing to have Malaysia absorb economic pain first and rebuild for the future.

    Mahathir looked at it differently. Unlike the ascendant Anwar, he was in the twilight of his career–and feared for his legacy. While Anwar hinted he wanted to end patronage, Mahathir genuinely thought the system he proudly calls ”Malaysia Incorporated” was a legitimate model for developing nations. A handful of wealthy businessmen are singled out for privileges and given the role of creating jobs, implementing big projects, and keeping the economy and the ruling party humming. Then wealth trickles down from Mahathir’s chosen few to the many.

    ”We view Malaysia as a corporation, and the shareholders in the government are companies,’’says Mustapha Mohamed, the new No.2 at the Finance Ministry. ”To the extent you help the bigger guys, the smaller guys benefit.” When Western agencies attacked his system as institutionalized corruption, Mahathir ”was quite angry,” says Francis Yeoh, managing director of YTL Corp. and a longtime Mahathir ally. ”He found it incredibly ! ! hypocritical and unfair.” Mahathir declined to be interviewed.

    When Malaysia was growing 8% to 10% annually, the uneasy alliance worked. But the crisis in Malaysia’s financial markets provoked a fury in Mahathir toward the outside world. The feud broke out two days after Mahathir returned from a two-month globe-trotting sabbatical in July, 1997, just as the crisis hit. He began blasting foreigners–and he kept it up for months. He blamed ”international manipulators” such as financier George Soros and Jewish traders for trying to undo the success of the Muslim Malaysians.

    Malaysian officials grew weary of the Mahathir effect on the currency and stock markets. The central bank, Bank Negara tracked the plunges in the ringgit every time Mahathir lashed out, and officials showed him the data. If Mahathir would tone it down, they suggested, the ringgit might stabilize. For a while, he complied.

    Meanwhile, Anwar tightened up on money and began urging Mahathir to suspend big infrastructure projects. When Mahathir agreed on September 5 to postpone the $5.3 billion Bakun Dam, a new airport, and plans to build the world’s longest building, the market enjoyed the largest one-day surge in over three years. But it fizzled as the crisis deepened.

    Mahathir’s patience ran out. On November 21, he set up the National Economic Action Council to devise remedies. It included Mahathir, Anwar, economic adviser Daim Zainuddin, and prominent economists and business leaders. Council members quickly squared off over the best cure for the crisis: the IMF’s austerity medicine or the easy money and massive government spending Mahathir preferred. ”We argued back and forth, back and forth,” recalls Zainal Aznam Yusof, deputy director of the Institute for Strategic & International Studies, a government think tank. But as the months wore on, ”we became convinced that you cannot go on with tightening monetary policy. You might push the economy over the edge.”

    Then came a move that rocked market confidence and drove a deeper wedge between Anwar and Mahathir: the bailout of big infrastructure developer Renong. Headed by longtime Mahathir associate Halim Saad, it was precisely the sort of company Mahathir was determined to save. Renong had built some of Malaysia’s biggest projects but was choking under a pile of debt. In a complex transaction that left minority shareholders in the cold, Renong subsidiary United Engineers Malaysia (UEM) paid a stiff premium to buy out the parent company. Analysts suspected that Mahathir allies benefited, a charge Renong denied.

    Anwar, miffed at the way the bailout was handled, ordered regulators to investigate. UEM was found to have broken disclosure rules, but the punishment was light. ”Within two weeks of the Renong-UEM deal being announced, it was all over” for Malaysia’s stock market, says a local securities trader.

    Five days after the Renong bailout came the meeting on Langkawi. Anwar, having just met with IMF Managing Director Michel Camdessus and acting on the advice of his central bank governor, Ahmad Don, had concluded that the IMF formula of tight monetary policy and government austerity was right. The Cabinet agreed. When Mahathir arrived, the virtual IMF program was a fait accompli.

    ”MORAL OBJECTION.” But local business leaders were growing unhappy with the effects of Anwar’s policies. So was Mahathir. ”The intensity of business collapses and bank collapses was like tenpins falling every day,” says YTL’s Yeoh. ”He couldn’t stand it.” Adds another prominent businessman: ”He doesn’t believe in bankruptcies.He has a moral objection to them.”

    The attempts to get around Anwar’s IMF-style budget grew. According to Anwar associates, Daim called the CEO of Bank Bumiputra, Abdul Aziz Othman, and asked him to lend $20 million to a company in trouble. After checking with Anwar, these sources say, Aziz told Daim no. Tensions between Daim and Anwar rose. Daim declines to comment on the allegation or other matters related to Anwar. Bank Bumi did not respond to requests for comment.

    By February, Mahathir was pushing for more bailouts. Anwar aides contend that the Prime Minister had broached the idea of using Petroliam Nasional (PETRONAS) to bail out his son Mirzan Mahathir’s shipping company, Konsortium Perkapalan (KP), which had trouble servicing its $490 million debt. Both Mirzan and PETRONAS deny the Prime Minister had anything to do with the $220 million purchase of KP’s assets by a PETRONAS unit. ‘

    ‘I didn’t ask him to intervene. I just told him that any businessman faced with this situation will have to sell and pay down the debt,” says Mirzan, who holds a Wharton MBA.’We believe we are a viable company.”But the deal reminded many Malaysians of Indonesia’s Suharto, who fell partly because of his family’s greed. In 1994, opposition politicians criticized the stakes Mahathir’s sons had in over 200 companies. Now, those concerns were resurfacing. Comparisons with Suharto ”must have upset Dr. Mahathir, even though there are important differences between the two,” says University of Malaya economist Professor K.S. Jomo.

    In April, the Anwar-Mahathir rift grew wider. Speaking in New York at the elite Council on Foreign Relations, Anwar lauded the virtues of ”creative destruction.” Mahathir would deride that term time and again in speeches months later. Anwar later told Mahathir he was trying to push Malaysia’s agenda by calling for reform of the international monetary system. But he did not mince his words in New York about what was going on back home. ”What are meant to be mere crutches often become permanent appendages, spawning a dependency mentality and rendering the public purse a rich feeding ground for all kinds of parasites,” he said to applause.

    Yet while he was away, Anwar got wind of another attempted bailout, this time for Daim pal Tajudin Ramli at Malaysia Airlines. ”The moment my back is turned, they push through this nonsense,” he told his aides. ”How am I supposed to explain this over here?” Mahathir denied he was involved. Anwar suggested the Finance Ministry would veto the deal, and it was never done.

    Shortly after Anwar returned home, Suharto fell. Mahathir had met with the aging strongman in Cairo on May 14 at the G-15 summit. Mahathir left the meeting speaking of ”foreign parties trying to unseat us both.” The new Indonesian President, B.J. Habibie, was a friend of Anwar.

    ESPIONAGE CHARGES. So was Indonesian newspaper editor Nasir Tamara, who caused a flap on June 2 when he addressed Malaysian scholars, businessmen, and social activists assembled by Anwar’s think tank. While he didn’t mention Malaysia, Nasir spoke of cronyism and explained how the reformasi movement toppled Suharto. An Anwar aide says Mahathir questioned his deputy about the speech.

    By the time the UMNO General Assembly meeting began on June 20, Mahathir had decided to get rid of Anwar–and the open battle began. Information packets given to the 1,900 conference attendees all contained a book alleging homosexual and heterosexual affairs by Anwar. The book, Fifty Reasons Why Anwar Cannot Be Prime Minister, also charged him with spying for a foreign power. Diplomats and other sources say the book could not have been distributed without Mahathir’s knowledge.

    Anwar’s camp returned fire. The leader of the UMNO Youth league, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, criticized the government for ”corruption, collusion, and nepotism.” Mahathir blasted back the next day, saying that everyone, including Anwar and his allies, had benefited from the state’s largesse. Days later, Mahathir announced that Daim would take over management of the economy. Anwar’s role was sharply curtailed. At a mention of Daim during an interview with BUSINESS WEEK on June 30, Anwar crossed his arms and visibly stiffened.

    By the end of August, Malaysian stocks were down 80% from the previous year. On September 1, Mahathir shocked the world by imposing currency controls. He told Anwar to resign by 5:30 p.m. the following day ”or I’ll humiliate you tomorrow,” according to former Anwar aides. He refused. ”I told him, ‘If you resign it’s like an admission of guilt,”’ Anwar’s wife Wan Azizah recalls saying the next day over a lunch where the food went uneaten. Anwar then went to his Finance Ministry office. At 5:30, the power went off at his official residence. At 7, Anwar received a letter from Mahathir saying he had been dismissed.

    ”I tried to work within the system,” Anwar told BUSINESS WEEK three days after his ouster. But now, Anwar acted like the outsider. He organized the biggest protest in Malaysia’s history on September 20, attended by up to 50,000 people, to call for reform. That day, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II was in town for the Commonwealth Games. Mahathir ordered Anwar’s arrest that night. A week later, Anwar appeared in court, bruised from what he said was a police beating.

    Whatever the verdict in Anwar’s trial, it is unlikely to end the momentum for reform kindled by his ouster. Clearly Malaysia’s reform movement has legs, although no one wants a repeat of the violence that devastated Indonesia during Suharto’s fall. It looks like the transition won’t be easy. Mahathir seems intent on staying in power to safeguard the economic structure he spent 17 years building. But even if Anwar vanishes from power, the questions he posed in this turbulent year will haunt his stern mentor for years to come.

    PDRM Allows Mob Justice TUN CULPRIT MAHATHIR CULPRIT,The hallowed halls of the judiciary were stained 20 years ago,WHAT IS ALL WORTH FOR YOU?

    Filed under: Uncategorized — taxi2driver @ 12:54 pm

    For those who do not know PDRM is the acronym for Polis Diraja Malaysia, and if you still do not know it is the Malaysian police force. I think this video explains itself, nothing less than a sickening act of violence against a couple of robbers right under the noses of the police who allow it all to happen. What a fantastic police force we have. How are we suppose to feel safe when we have these kind of police working for us?www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYxj93jGJsY

    Enjoy and I hope you’re not watching and having a meal at the same time.

    This isn’t a naive question. Who is the law in Malaysia – the police or Umno?

    Police stopped Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim from finishing his speech at a Pakatan Rakyat ceramah in Kulai last night. Only the PKR de facto leader was not allowed to deliver his full speech while other allies earlier spoke to the crowd.

    Kulai PKR chief Liew Shin Kheong was quoted as syaing Kullai Jaya OCPD Supt Zulkifli Yahya had led a police team to end the ceramah, ostensibly at the behest of a group of 30 Umno Youth members.

    Since when did police say they take orders from Umno or, for that matter, Umno Youth? Don’t they know the difference between government and party? Or have they become so blatant about only persecuting the opposition but not parties that are part of the federal government?

    After all, it doesn’t matter whether it is the government or the opposition parties. The police are supposed to act without fear or favour.

    Anwar himself lambasted Zulkifli’s decision as “nonsensical” in a text-message that he circulated earlier today.

    “It is unreasonable that police should bow to Umno and follow the directions of a small number of rude supporters,” the Permatang Pauh MP said.

    If anything, the police should have taken action against the Pakatan Rakyat for not having a permit for the ceramah. Of course, one would have expected the police to issue a permit as a matter of routine but that is a different matter altogether.

    What is important is that the police act without fear or favour and is seen to act without fear or favour. Already, its history of doing so is rather suspect.

    The Royal Malaysian Police appears to have a penchant to come out in full force to stop ceramahs and gatherings rather than work to bring down the crime rate with more patrols, and capturing suspected criminals rather than just shooting them dead.

    Just like the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) that appears to prosecute small fry and opposition politicians rather than the big fish and those from the ruling coalition. The Port Klang Free Zone and the Lingam video clip scandals come to mind.

    Before these enforcement authorities get their knickers in a twist, they should remember that their existence is to guarantee the peace and security of Malaysia and go after wrong-doers, no matter who they are.

    It does them no good if they take orders from a political party. They should base their actions on the laws of the land. No more, no less.

    TEAR GAS FIRED AT ANWAR CERAMAH, LEADERS HOLED UP
    Posted by admin
    Monday, 23 March 2009 23:51
    UPDATED 11.27PM
    (The Malaysian Insider) SUNGAI PETANI, March 23 — Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) forces fired tear gas and used water cannons tonight on thousands gathered at a ceramah in Bukit Selambau just as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was beginning his speech.
    The FRU engaged the crowd at about 10pm and the opposition leader and other Pakatan Rakyat leaders are holed up in the building where the ceramah was being held as of 10.45pm.
    According to PKR’s Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jeyakumar, those arrested include fellow party member Zamri Yusuf who is a Senator from Kedah and Anwar’s chief of staff Ibrahim Yaacob.
    He added that the crowd of thousands dispersed into nearby housing areas with the FRU giving chase who continue to fire tear gas.
    Others arrested include aides to Kedah Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak and S Manikumar, the candidate for the Bukit Selambau by-elections on April 7.
    “I am so angry that the FRU used water cannons and tear gas on 5,000 people gathered to hear DSAI speak,” he stated.
    He also told The Malaysian Insider that there are rumours that the authorities want to detain the PKR de facto leader.
    Other PKR sources have also told The Malaysian Insider of such rumours since last week when Anwar first hit the campaign trail for the three simultaneous by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang and Batang Ai.

    TEAR GAS FIRED AT ANWAR CERAMAH, LEADERS HOLED UP Posted by admin   Monday, 23 March 2009 23:51UPDATED 11.27PM
    (The Malaysian Insider) SUNGAI PETANI, March 23 — Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) forces fired tear gas and used water cannons tonight on thousands gathered at a ceramah in Bukit Selambau just as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was beginning his speech.
    The FRU engaged the crowd at about 10pm and the opposition leader and other Pakatan Rakyat leaders are holed up in the building where the ceramah was being held as of 10.45pm.
    According to PKR’s Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jeyakumar, those arrested include fellow party member Zamri Yusuf who is a Senator from Kedah and Anwar’s chief of staff Ibrahim Yaacob.
    He added that the crowd of thousands dispersed into nearby housing areas with the FRU giving chase who continue to fire tear gas.
    Others arrested include aides to Kedah Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak and S Manikumar, the candidate for the Bukit Selambau by-elections on April 7.
    “I am so angry that the FRU used water cannons and tear gas on 5,000 people gathered to hear DSAI speak,” he stated.
    He also told The Malaysian Insider that there are rumours that the authorities want to detain the PKR de facto leader.
    Other PKR sources have also told The Malaysian Insider of such rumours since last week when Anwar first hit the campaign trail for the three simultaneous by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang and Batang Ai.

    Malaysia Clears Top Cop, Lawyer Of Political Plot
    2009-03-11 16:51KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia’s government cleared the police chief and attorney
    general Wednesday (11 March) of accusations that they conspired against
    opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim ahead of trials that led to his imprisonment
    a decade ago.

    The decision dashes Anwar’s bid to bolster his claim that he was framed on
    charges of corruption and sodomy in a high-level political plot following
    his ouster as deputy prime minister in 1998.

    Anwar’s accusation against the two officials, made last July, was also
    considered an attempt to cast doubt on the credibility of authorities after
    he faced a new charge of sodomy last year. Anwar is scheduled to go on trial
    in July on a charge of sodomizing a male former aide.

    Nazri Aziz, the minister in charge of legal affairs, said an independent
    panel of ex-judges found no basis to Anwar’s claim that Inspector General of
    Police Musa Hassan and Attorney General Abdul Gani Patail fabricated medical
    evidence while Anwar was in police custody in 1998.

    At that time, Anwar had been ousted from the Cabinet and was subsequently
    convicted of corruption and sodomizing his former family driver. He was
    imprisoned through 2004, when a court overturned the sodomy conviction.

    After his release, Anwar stitched together an opposition alliance that won
    an unprecedented 82 of 222 seats in Parliament in general elections last
    March.

    y

    April 16, 2009 in Musings

    Way back 15 years ago, I turned up  on the courts beat, as a frightened rookie scribe. Just my luck, I thought, that my first day on the beat and I get to follow my senior into the intimidating Court of Appeal.

    The proceedings seemed so hushed that my racing heartbeat seemed louder than the judges’ words. There were three robed blokes up there.

    My senior told me who they were. Mahadev Shankar, Gopal Sri Ram and N.H Chan. The names stayed with me over the years.

    Today N.H Chan’s name came up again in a brave stand that reminded me of the heydays, of the guy dubbed Lion of Law, Justice Eusoffe Abdoolcader (tragically deceased).

    Retired Justice N.H Chan could have shut up and spent his retirement in peace. But such are the ways of the men of conscience. Men who still thought the law should be about upholding justice.

    judgingthejudges

    Today, this learned judge stood up to expose, yet again another evidence of the prostitution of the Malaysian judiciary.

    The hallowed halls of the judiciary were stained 20 years ago, with the intervention of the executive, but that doesn’t make it any easier for me to read of this mockery. Read it. Here’s a guy who is firing his salvos with such bullets as established legal precedents. LOCAL legal precedents, mind you.

    I can’t resist stealing some juicy paragraphs from the link above. This is calling a spade a spade, a rotten judge, well…A ROTTEN JUDGE!

    THURSDAY, A

    Anwar claims the latest sodomy charge is meant to stem the opposition’s
    threat to the ruling coalition of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who
    is being forced to step down following pressure by government officials.

    Abdullah will hand power to his deputy, Najib Razak, on 3 April, the
    Malaysian Insider news Web site reported Wednesday. Abdullah’s aides said
    they could not immediately confirm the report by the site, which is run by
    political pundits close to Abdullah’s administration.

    Abdullah is expected to retire in late March or early April, but he has so
    far not publicly announced a date. (AP)
    ____

    TEAR GAS FIRED AT ANWAR CERAMAH, LEADERS HOLED UPPosted by adminMonday, 23 March 2009 23:51UPDATED 11.27PM(The Malaysian Insider) SUNGAI PETANI, March 23 — Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) forces fired tear gas and used water cannons tonight on thousands gathered at a ceramah in Bukit Selambau just as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was beginning his speech.The FRU engaged the crowd at about 10pm and the opposition leader and other Pakatan Rakyat leaders are holed up in the building where the ceramah was being held as of 10.45pm.According to PKR’s Selangor executive councillor Dr Xavier Jeyakumar, those arrested include fellow party member Zamri Yusuf who is a Senator from Kedah and Anwar’s chief of staff Ibrahim Yaacob.He added that the crowd of thousands dispersed into nearby housing areas with the FRU giving chase who continue to fire tear gas.Others arrested include aides to Kedah Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak and S Manikumar, the candidate for the Bukit Selambau by-elections on April 7.“I am so angry that the FRU used water cannons and tear gas on 5,000 people gathered to hear DSAI speak,” he stated.He also told The Malaysian Insider that there are rumours that the authorities want to detain the PKR de facto leader.Other PKR sources have also told The Malaysian Insider of such rumours since last week when Anwar first hit the campaign trail for the three simultaneous by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang and Batang Ai.

    Next Page »

    Blog at WordPress.com.