February 9, 2010 • 12:17 pm 0

THE MOST EXPENSIVE ASSHOLE MAN IN THE WORLD

SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2010

SUNDAY SNIPPETS

FEB 14 IS NO-PANTIES-VALENTINE’S DAY.

PANTIES CAN INCRIMINATE YOU!

THE ORGANISERS DEEM IT FIT TO AUCTION OFF THIS CELEBRITY’S UNDERGARMENT.

BAIL MONEY WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE PROCEEDS OF THE AUCTION.

+++++

THE COURTS IN PERAK AND KUALA LUMPUR WILL ROCK THIS WEEK

read this exclusive story The real Pengecut is UTUSAN & “First Lady”S little boy Patail the mother fucking stinking Rosma’S PUSSY LICKING ASSHOLES, YOU WANNA PLAY HARDBALL?

readthis exclusive story When you have Idiotic and Ridiculous Prime Minister to reappoint a retarted brained IGP dont blame Najib

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS HERE

Filed under: Uncategorized

• 11:14 am 0

You ask for it! don’t get natural JUSTICE from the Barisan only artificial justics that sinks

Justice may be delayed, but it can never be denied.MAHARTIR THE COURT IS WAITING!

Corrupt political leadership does not attractive men of outstanding integrity; neither can it be expected to enact effective laws to maintain high integrity in government. That truism has practically reduced our options to only one – a change of political leadership. That is, if we are still serious about restoring the rule of law and the pursuit of excellence for the country.

read this exclusive article

Supreme Court judges do not seem to comply with internationally accepted standards for managing conflict of interest in cases

readmore click this Justice may be delayed, but it can never be denied.MAHARTIR THE COURT IS WAITING!

The Federal Court decision today will lead to a situation where there could be “absolute monarchy” inMalaysia, claimed former menteri besar Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin. “An illegitimate government which did not follow the rules of parliamentary democracy has been supported by the judicial institution. This is sad as it would lead to other consequences.”

………Like what Pandora’s gynaecologist found out…read more click this…Do you think we have three Mafia gangs in MALAYSIA-mafia Police, mafia Politicians and mafia Criminals? They all keep fighting for their dominance and common people just suffer?

Professor Abdul Aziz Bari, constitutional law expert

It is bad news for democracy for the court has reduced the constitution – which sought to put in place a democratic government – to a mere legal document. One wonders whether judges really understood the concept of responsible government.

The court in this instance has added another case to a list of cases that go against the very idea of constitutionalism and democracy, which stand at the very heart of the constitution. It is a pity that the court took a literal and pedantic approach that throws democracy out of the window.

Zaid Ibrahim, former law minister and Pakatan coordinator

As I said before, our judges in the upper echelon of the judiciary will continue to fail the people of this country. Today, the principles governing parliamentary democracy and the rule of law have been sacrificed because they have to please the political masters.

I hope the BN leaders in the midst of their celebrations realise the significance of the ruling. It means that the monarch can refuse the appointment of a menteri besar chosen by the party in power (as in Terengganu) but now can dismiss the lawful menteri besar if he so chooses. Another black day for the country.

DANG! Nothing like a lamb-shank to get rid of this awful taste!

THEIR LORDSHEEPS HAVE SPOKEN!

read this exlusive articlejudges are predators, not protectors paraiyan PREPOSTERIOUS asshole MAHATHIR sold his soul to stay in power

Three constitutional questions were posed for the Federal Court’s decision:

1. A proper interpretation of Article 16(6) of the Perak constitution under which a menteri besar can advise the sultan to dissolve the assembly – what if there is no motion of no confidence against the MB and he refuses to resign?

2. Can the sultan determine if a menteri besar commands the confidence of the majority of the House without a vote in the assembly?

3. Does the state constitution allow the sultan to sack a menteri besar, or is the position is deemed vacant if he chooses not to resign?

+++++

Federal Court rules unanimously to dismiss Nizar’s appeal

and declares Zambry is the legitimate MB.

Court rules affirmative to question 1 thus no need for house vote to question 2 meaning sultans action to deem nizar’s post vacant is valid. For question 3, court agrees that sultan may remove MB and appoint new MB who commands confidence of majority of members.

THANK YOU MOST HONORABLE JUDGES.

IT IS NOW THAT PERAKIANS WILL SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.readmoreMalaysianSupreme Court VS Pakistani Supreme Court Mahathir must save our Ketuanan Melayu at all cost

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010

THEY HAVE DECIDED: TO PROTECT THE LAW OR TURN MALAYSIA INTO A PARIAH STATE LIKE ZIMBABWE!readmoreALL SET, JUDGES IN PLACE the untouchable beautifully beastifully Rosmah to sent Anwar Ibrahim to jail Rosmah has no time to entertain ‘wild allegations’

Filed under: Uncategorized — fawas @ 3:39 pm Edit This

HALL OF SHAME

MOHD EUSOFF CHIN

DISGRACE#01 MOHD EUSOFF CHIN, CHIEF JUSTICE OF MALAYSIA FROM 1994 – 2000, SUBJECTED HIMSELF TO THE WORST KIND OF CORRUPTION, BY ‘TAGGING’ ALONG LAWYER V.K. LINGAM ON A FAMILY VACATION IN NEW ZEALAND IN 1994. HE SUBSEQUENTLY LIED TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON THE LINGAM TAPE SCANDAL.

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

DISGRACE#02 S. AUGUSTINE PAUL, CURRENTLY FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, SUBJECTED HIMSELF TO BE A POLITICAL WHORE WHEN IN 1998, WHILE BEING A KUALA LUMPUR HIGH COURT JUDGE, PARTICIPATED IN THE POLITICAL CONSPIRACY ORCHESTRATED BY THEN PRIME MINISTER MAHATHIR MOHAMAD. HE PUT THROUGH A SHOW TRIAL OF THEN-DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER ANWAR IBRAHIM AND SUBSEQUENTLY CONVICTED THE LATTER OF SODOMY AND CORRUPTION. AMONG HIS NOTORIETIES, HE ALLOWED THE PROSECUTION TO CHANGE THE TIME OF OFFENCE THREE TIMES WHEN ANWAR’S LAWYERS PROVIDED THE ALIBI.

AHMAD FAIRUZ BIN SHEIKH ABDUL HALIM

DISGRACE#03 AHMAD FAIRUZ BIN SHEIKH ABDUL HALIM, CHIEF JUSTICE OF MALAYSIA FROM 2003 TO 2007, WAS TAPED IN THE ‘JUDICIAL FIXING’ SCANDAL WHERE HE WAS HEARD IN CONVERSATION WITH LAWYER V.K. LINGAM, ON HOW TO GET FAIRUZ TO BE ELEVATED AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF MALAYSIA. HE SUBSEQUENTLY LIED TO THE ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY THAT HE WAS NOT THE OTHER PARTY IN THE SAID TELEPHONE CONVERSATION.

RIDWAN BIN IBRAHIM

DISGRACE#04 RIDWAN BIN IBRAHIM, CURRENTLY JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER OF IPOH HIGH COURT, PARTICIPATED IN THE AFTERMATH OF PERAK STATE COUP BY NAJIB TUN RAZAK. HE FIRST CREATED THE STIR WHEN HE INFAMOUSLY RULED THAT FIVE LAWYERS APPOINTED BY PERAK STATE SPEAKER V. SIVAKUMAR HAD NO LOCUS STANDI TO REPRESENT SIVAKUMAR. THE ASTONISHING RULING FORCED SIVAKUMAR TO BE UNREPRESENTED EFFECTIVELY, AS HIS RULING ALSO STATED THAT SIVAKUMAR CAN ONLY BE REPRESENTED BY THE STATE LEGAL ADVISOR, WHO HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE COLLUDING WITH THE ILLEGAL MENTERI BESAR ZAMBRY.

RAMLY BIN HJ ALI

DISGRACE#05 RAMLY BIN HJ ALI, CURRENTLY A JUDGE AT THE COURT OF APPEAL, TOOK SIDE ON THE PERAK MB VS. MB ON MAY 12, 2009 WHEN HE ALONE HEARD THE APPEAL FROM BN MENTERI BESAR ZAMBRY AND GRANTED HIM STAY OF EXECUTION ON THE HIGH COURT RULING, WHICH DECLARED NIZAR AS THE LEGITIMATE MENTERI BESAR. RAMLY’S HEARING THE APPEAL ALONE WAS A SERIOUS DEPARTURE FROM THE NORM OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, WHICH HEARS CASES IN PANEL OF AT LEAST THREE JUDGES.

BALIA YUSOF BIN HAJI WAHI

DISGRACE#06 BALIA YUSOF BIN HAJI WAHI, CURRENTLY A JUDGE AT KUALA LUMPUR HIGH COURT, DISMISSED ON APR 1, 2009, PERAK STATE ASSEMBLY SPEAKER V. SIVAKUMAR’S APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT SUMMONS BY BROUGHT BY THE THREE INDEPENDENT ASSEMBLYMEN, SEEKING A DECLARATION THAT SIVAKUMAR’S ORDER TO DECLARE THEIR ASSEMBLY SEATS VACANT WAS ILLEGAL.

BALIA YUSOF’S DECISION IS A STARK VIOLATION OF THE VERY FUNDAMENTAL OF SEPARATIONS OF POWERS, WHERE PROCEEDINGS IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ANY STATE CANNOT BE INTERVENED BY THE COURT.

ALAUDDIN BIN MOHD. SHERIFF

DISGRACE#07 ALAUDDIN BIN MOHD. SHERIFF, CURRENTLY PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, RULED ON APR 16, 2009 THAT PERAK ASSEMBLY SPEAKER V SIVAKUMAR DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER TO SUSPEND MENTRI BESAR DATUK ZAMBRY ABD KADIR AND SIX STATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM ATTENDING THE ASSEMBLY. IT IS A DECISION THAT WAS MADE IN BLATANT DEFIANCE OF ARTICLE 72 (1) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHICH SAYS,”THE VALIDITY OF ANY PROCEEDINGS IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ANY STATE SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED IN ANY COURT”.

ARIFIN BIN ZAKARIA

DISGRACE#08 ARIFIN BIN ZAKARIA, CURRENTLY CHIEF JUDGE OF MALAYA, RULED ON APR 16, 2009 THAT PERAK ASSEMBLY SPEAKER V SIVAKUMAR DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER TO SUSPEND MENTRI BESAR DATUK ZAMBRY ABD KADIR AND SIX STATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM ATTENDING THE ASSEMBLY. IT IS A DECISION THAT WAS MADE IN BLATANT DEFIANCE OF ARTICLE 72 (1) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHICH SAYS,”THE VALIDITY OF ANY PROCEEDINGS IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ANY STATE SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED IN ANY COURT”.

ZULKEFLI BIN AHMAD MAKINUDIN

DISGRACE#09 ZULKEFLI BIN AHMAD MAKINUDIN, CURRENTLY FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, RULED ON APR 16, 2009 THAT PERAK ASSEMBLY SPEAKER V SIVAKUMAR DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER TO SUSPEND MENTRI BESAR DATUK ZAMBRY ABD KADIR AND SIX STATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM ATTENDING THE ASSEMBLY. IT IS A DECISION THAT WAS MADE IN BLATANT DEFIANCE OF ARTICLE 72 (1) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHICH SAYS,”THE VALIDITY OF ANY PROCEEDINGS IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ANY STATE SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED IN ANY COURT”.

NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN

DISGRACE#10 NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, FORMER FEDERAL COURT JUDGE, RULED ON APR 16, 2009 THAT PERAK ASSEMBLY SPEAKER V SIVAKUMAR DOES NOT HAVE THE POWER TO SUSPEND MENTRI BESAR DATUK ZAMBRY ABD KADIR AND SIX STATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM ATTENDING THE ASSEMBLY. IT IS A DECISION THAT WAS MADE IN BLATANT DEFIANCE OF ARTICLE 72 (1) OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHICH SAYS,”THE VALIDITY OF ANY PROCEEDINGS IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ANY STATE SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED IN ANY COURT”.

MOHD ZAKI BIN MD. YASIN

DISGRACE#11 MOHD ZAKI BIN MD. YASIN, CURRENTLY JUDGE AT SHAH ALAM HIGH COURT, PRESIDED THE MOCK TRIAL OF ALTANTUYA MURDER CASE, WHICH EVENTUALLY ACQUITTED ABDUL RAZAK BAGINDA, A CLOSE ASSOCIATE OF THEN DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER NAJIB TUN RAZAK,

On February 10, the Supreme Court threw out yet another petition seeking to reinstate L K Advani as an accused in the trial of the conspiracy to demolish Babri Masjid. This is despite a host of circumstances pointing to the probability of Advani, NDA’s prime ministerial candidate in the upcoming election, being involved in the conspiracy. Not the least of which was his notorious rath yatra in the run-up to the demolition. And the testimony of the IPS officer in charge of his security, Anju Gupta, stating that his speech on the spot minutes before the demolition had added fuel to the fire.
On February 13, in the first of the Nithari serial killing cases to be decided, a trial court pronounced death sentence on Moninder Singh Pandher for a murder that took place when he was far away in Australia. And for the murder of a girl who he did not even know. As the prosecution admitted, there was no evidence to suggest that it was at Pandher’s instance that his servant Surender Koli had raped and killed 14-year-old Rimpa Haldar, the victim who lived in a slum near his house. Yet, Pandher was held to be a conspirator mainly because his sexual profligacy was found to have brought out depravity in his servant.
The two interpretations of criminal conspiracy could not have been more different: ultra liberal in the case of Advani and stretched in the case of Pandher. Neither interpretation seems justified in the given facts and circumstances. Both the interpretations raise questions about the rigor and detachment with which the judiciary at all levels performs its job.

We just don’t seem to get it. The normal standards of accountability don’t apply to judges. We are unable to grasp their argument that, much as it is desirable in other institutions, transparency in the judiciary will compromise its independence, a larger constitutional value. Hence, we persist with the folly of expecting judges to be swept away by the wave of transparency triggered by RTI.
This is evident from the two latest attacks on judges on July 17. First, this incorrigible sceptic, Prashant Bhushan, mobilised a statement from 25 eminent citizens denouncing a proposed Bill, which prohibits the declarations of assets made by judges to their respective chiefs from being made public. The statement fails to appreciate Law Minister Veerappa Moily’s sensitivity in coming up with a draft that reflects a consensus among judges. As if that were not bad enough, the statement is cheeky enough to suggest that, following the example of their American counterparts, our Lordships too should be transparent about their assets so that we could point out any “unusual accretion” or “false declaration”.
But it is not just civil society that is being irreverent to judges. For, the same day, just before shutting for the weekend, the Central Information Commission (CIC) released an order where it repeated its folly of trying to bring the Chief Justice of India under the ambit of RTI. It once again demolished the CJI’s position that he need not disclose any information lying in his custody as he was independent and distinct from the Supreme Court, which is a public authority under RTI.
It may be recalled that when CJI K G Balakrishnan had first taken this view about a year ago, it was very much in the context of declarations of assets. Since those declarations were in his custody, the CJI held then that the Supreme Court registry would not entertain any RTI queries concerning them. Yet, in its latest order in another case, the CIC defied the CJI saying, “The institution and its head cannot be two distinct Public Authorities. They are one and the same. Information, therefore, available with the Chief Justice of India must be deemed to be available with the Supreme Court of India.”
Like us, the CIC too doesn’t seem to get it. The general logic doesn’t apply to judges. When others take refuge in opacity, we are justified in suspecting that they are hiding corruption. But when judges wrap themselves in a veil of secrecy, we have to take it that they are actually doing so for our good, so that they are not distracted by allegations of corruption against themselves.
One way of coming to terms with this distinction is to re-adopt the outdated notion that king could do no wrong. Going by his logic, Justice Balakrishnan does seem to suggest some such blanket immunity to judges. If some judge has made an unusual accretion to his assets or has made a false declaration of them, it should be no cause for concern to us, the consumers of justice. It’s time we realised that judges have their inscrutable reasons. We should just be grateful to them for whatever justice they dispense to us, in their magnanimity and in their good time. Don’t bring the notions of accountability and transparency into this one-of-a-kind relationship.

PRESIDENT OF COURT OF APPEALS

CHIEF JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF MALAYA

FEDERAL COURT JUDGE

+++++

MEANWHILE, SOME ESSENTIAL READING ON

THE NECESSITY OF

… JUDGES ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE PURSUIT OF POWER. IF THEY WERE, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BECOME JUDGES.

JUDGING THE JUDGES

HERE

+++++

WE IN PERAK HAVE TO LEARN IT THE HARD WAY. BUT OUR HOPE AND DREAM FOR A PEOPLE’S GOVERNMENT IN PERAK SHALL NEVER DIE, REGARDLESS OF TUESDAY’S FEDERAL COURT JUDGMENT.

HERE

Filed under: Uncategorized

February 8, 2010 • 2:18 pm 0

Mr Kohilan a smelly intoxicated parayan UMNO dog,YOU ARE NOT EVEN ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE.

Malaysian ministers think they are such BIG shots that each time they open their mouth venom spews out. Where is the diplomacy, Malaysia? This is not the first time a Malaysian minister has talked of summoning this Ambassador or that Ambassador over trivial issues. The other recent one is the Sabah travel warning by the US. Summon also.Any you a smelly intoxicated parayan UMNO dog,YOU NOT EVEN ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE. For all you know, behind the minister’s back the embassy staff probably give him their middle finger salute. What idiotic ministers we have. Pathetic.My advice: shut up your filthyS,toddy smelly mouth, ‘cos the foreign countries do have every right like you do to judge those who err and victimise against their own people. You want to be a busybody, so do these people Why not you ask your real minister to come out to face the foreign diplomat ?RELATED ARTICLE

You are forced to take this difficult task because INDIANS are real beggars, you are a bastard beggar Beggar has no choice . If umno pimps ask your asshole to used, you will let it obediently RELATED ARTICLE OUR JUDGES CHANGE DECSIONS LIKE CHANGING UNDERWEARS OR THEY CHANGE ACCORDING TO WHICH WOMAN THEY SLEPT THE PREVIOUS NIGHT. The case has only just begun so these foreign countries should please leave it to Malaysia’s judges to decide rather than creating their own trial by making damaging comments about our system.’

Mr Kohilan did not single out any countries for criticism but the government-linked New Straits Times on Monday reported a speech to Australia’s parliament by Mr Michael Danby, chairman of its sub-committee on foreign affairs.

‘The Malaysian legal system is being manipulated by supporters of the incumbent government to drive… Anwar Ibrahim out of national politics,’ Mr Danby told parliament last week. ‘Perverting the legal system for political ends by charging Anwar with sexual offences is an affront to human rights,’ he added.

The New Straits Times quoted Mr Kohilan as saying he would summon representatives of countries deemed to be interfering in the Anwar affair. This Mr Kohilan is a killer of Freedom of Speech. He should be put on trial for attempt murder of Free Speech. Luckily for him ,in Australia free speech is not a crime, otherwise he would be hauled up by the ICJ for his crime against humanity.Similar stories ….. Saddam used to tell the rest of the world to mind their own business. Ferdinand Marcos said the same thing. Myanmar’s military junta is still saying to the rest of the world to eff-off. And when push comes to shove, Malaysia voted to go along to condemn these dictators, support sanctions & blockages, send military troops under the UN Peacekeeping ambit, etc.

Every civilised country’s representative or diplomat must surely showed concern of how the Malaysian government’s judiciary system works in order that their country’s interests are looked after as they have invested heavily in this country for ages.

If the Malaysian government is not adhering to the international norm of constitutional laws but a uniquely Malaysian jungle laws, then the international community is showing concerned.

Kohilan Pillay doesnt even know between “concern” and “interfere.” No wonder the BN/UMNO government doesnt even have quality ministers in their ranks but those who are good, qualified and capable ministerial people are being put down by this evil regime by hook or by crook to protect their interests.

nazis a disgrace to his country. How does he who suffers from altantuyamania He suffers from desperation , We had 25years of morons running this mess, and cannot afford 4 more years of Monkey business as usual.he has made enough profits for scams like submarine and allowed enough record profits for the baginda’s companies. malaysia will not be tricked by eggheads warlords and their game of scaring the public into voting for the greedy omnoputras I am proud to be called a LIBERAL if it means not acting like a conservative head up asshole like nazis God saveMalaysia by helping guide those to the good sense to

n reason is simple~those evil power brokers of the ruling party will stage an Emergency in order to retain their power.readmore Augustine Paul THE HELL FIRE WILL EAT DAILY YOUR WARIS WILL BE SELLING THEIR ASSHOLE FOR LIVING THIS IS THE CURSE OF GOOD PEOPLE OF MALAYSIA the laughing stock of the whole world,

HELL FIRE WILL EAT YOUTry your best to rest with fires burning around you… difficult heh?

Disgusting Paul has gone to be judged by his Maker. He committed great injustice to the many innocent who bore the consequences of his judgement. He shamed everyone who knew him, his profession and the country…he will be one loss many will rejoice to lose!Good riddance to a corrupt Judge.

Sad to say, but I join the members here in saying…. No Takziah from me.

READ THIS EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE BY THE TAXI DRIVER

The Malaysian greatest cover ups by the murderous Prime Minister Najib

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

S. Augustine Paul

S. Augustine Paul a/l Sinnappen, currently Federal Court judge, subjected himself to be a political whore in 1998. While a Kuala Lumpur high court judge, he participated in the political conspiracy orchestrated by the then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to bring down the then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim. He put through a show trial of Anwar and subsequently convicted the latter of sodomy and corruption.

The conviction was clearly riddled with holes. Augustine Paul allowed the prosecution had to change the date of the alleged offence several times after Anwar’s lawyers demonstrated conclusively that he could not have been at the place at the date nominated. So crude was the frame-up that in one case the building in which the offence was alleged to have occurred, had not even been constructed.

In the end, Augustine Paul took the extraordinary step of allowing the prosecution to nominate 7.45 p.m. somewhere between January and March 1993. Even though the defence produced documents to account for Anwar’s movements for every day over that period, Augustine Paul ignored the evidence and found Anwar guilty.

By convicting Anwar, Augustine Paul solely relied on the framed up allegations of the witness, Azizan Abu Bakar, who was shown by the defence team to beunreliable.

Augustine Paul was infamously called the “irrelevant judge” for repeatedly refusing submissions of evidence by Anwar’s defence team and ruled them ‘irrelevant’.

Obviously a judicial officer without anyproper talent noteworthy, he had been a sessions court judge, until one week before Anwar’s sodomy trial. He was promoted promptly to be a high court judge and took on the case. After serving his part in the political conspiracy, he was summarily promoted to be a judge of Court of Appeal on 1 August 2003, and then on to be a judge of Federal Court, the apex court in Malaysia, on 17 June 2005.

He ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.

The judges of the Federal Court have failed the people and the government of this country when they chose to ignore the law of the Constitution of Malaysia. In other words the judges have refused to do justice according to law.

Incidentally, ultra vires does not mean “outside the law”. It means “outside one’s jurisdiction, beyond the scope of one s power or authority”. And we may ask, who is the Federal Court to say what is beyond the jurisdiction of the Speaker when the supreme law of the country says that “the validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.

He was born October 12, 1944 in Batu Gajah, Perak. He had his early education at Sultan Yusof School, Batu Gajah and Anderson School, Ipoh. He was called to the Bar of Inner Temple, London in 1971 and obtained his Bachelor of Laws Degree from the University of London as an external student in 1979. He is married to Dr Mary with two children, Dr Juliana Sharmini and Alan John.

Sexual Politics, Malaysia Style”: The first charges again Anwar Ibrahim

The state of Malaysian police and A.G ?READMORE“Sexual Politics, Malaysia Style”: The first charges again Anwar Ibrahim

READ MORE CLICK THISMahathir admitting conspiracy in the 1988 sodomy accusation?who pushed it in Rosma? Mumtaj’s girl Khairil Asshole (Pegawai Khas Dato’ Seri Najib)

The ‘Sodomy 2.0′ version unfolded on June 28 when PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim’s 23-year-old former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan lodged a police report. He claimed to have been sodomised by Anwar in a condominium in Damansara. To many, it was unreal. Ten years ago, Anwar had faced a similar charge which saw him being jailed until the conviction and sentence were overturned on appeal in 2004. In the latest episode, he was arrested on July 16 by balaclava-clad police – a scene reminiscent of that in 1998- but freed a day later after being questioned and made to undergo a medical examination.My legal team advised me that we should refer and compel the syariah court to instruct the prosecution to conduct their work professionally in accordance with the syariah law in Islam. What is so important of talking

about syariah law when you don’t respect the basic principles of the law?“They talk about syariah when it only seems to be convenient to them politically. Syariah must be abovepolitical, individual sentiments,” he told reporters at the Federal Territorysyariah High Court here. Anwar claimed that the director of the Federal Territory Religious Department (Jawi) and the minister in the

Prime Minister’s Department are trying to sabotage the case read more click this Charge Najib,Ezam,Rosmah, charge them for abetting SAIFUL for making

a false report and causing all the trouble.Send them to jail

As the sodomy trial of Anwar Ibrahim grip the nation, TAXIDRIVER’S WEBNETWORK managed to secure an interview with his accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari who was anxious to dispel public doubts and reservations about his case. The interview was held in a posh condominium in an exclusive part of Kuala Lumpur. Also present was his FUTURE WIFE MUNTAZ ‘S DAUGHTER ANAK MAMI. The spacious condominium with a spectacular view of the city looked luxurious with polished granite flooring, Persian rugs, dazzling crystal chandeliers and expensive rococo style furniture with gold trimmings.

TAXI DRIVER: Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed. My, what a beautiful apartment. Is it yours?

Saiful: it comes with the package deal.

TAXIDRIVER: (looking at the personal photos on the wall).so it is yours. Anyway, let’s get down to business. By the way, we will be recording this interview on video. Is that alright with you?

Saiful: No problem, I want everybody to see how genuin IS MY ASSHOLE. Just make sure you broadcast it widely and distribute it to RTM, TV3, Astro and upload to Youtube.

TAXIDRIVER: Was that incident on 26 June 2008 the first time that Datuk Seri Anwar sodomized you?

Saiful: No! As I’ve said before, I’m been sodomized 8-9 times before. Poked here…poked there until I got fed up. There’s only so much sodomy a man can stand you know?

TAXIDRIVER: you mean to says that a 63 old man still has his rocket turbour charged?

ARE YOU A GAY?

Saiful: (sounding offended) Of course not! I have a fiancée you know? We’re going to get married and start a family when this case blows over.I mean MUNTAZ JAFFAR’daughter she is with me whatever it is ,she love me, I have that powerfull magnet to pull both man and woman .

Saiful: Well, he’s a very powerful person. He’s the opposition leader. I need do this, the way ezam and rosma want me to do and worried about losing my job.

TAXIDRIVER: yes , you were sent there to do this job, you have,YOU HAVE TO GET CLEARANCE

FROM YOUR REAL BOSS WHO IS ALSO BOSS TO MUNTAZ JAFFAR

Saiful: (rolling hi eyes) Well, ummm…ummm…he can get me arrested and beaten up? Maybe he can get Special Branch to come after me? Maybe even have me locked up under the ISA?

TAXI DRIVER: Come on now, Saiful. An opposition leader doesn’t have that power?

Saiful looked at for help. Saiful’s fiancée lean over and whispered in his ear.

Saiful: Of course you know, I was foolish and Anwar was my idol. I would do anything for him. When your idol asked you to bend over you would, right?

TAXI DRIVER: So are you saying it was consensual?

Saiful: No! No if I say consentral i will be arrested, It was against my will. I swear it!

Taxidriver: You’ve already done so in a mosque. But your college mates say you hated Anwar’s guts.

Saiful: Oh no, I loved Anwar’s guts. I was a super-secret admirer.

TAXIDRIVER: Normally a secret admirer doesn’t express the opposite but let’s leave that aside for the moment. Tell us what REALLY made you decide to go to the police after the last sodomy

Saiful: Well, after metting Rodwan at room 619 at concorde hotel here, gave me the strength and the inspiration. He said, “Saiful, look at you. You’re earning a miserable RM1000 a month. Imagine what you can have if you… (ouch!)” muntaz’s daughter giving Saiful a swift kick at his expensive asshole

Saiful: What I mean to say is that I can’t stand being poked any more. The pain, the humiliation, the disgust. I feel so…violated!

TAXIDRIVER: And so you decided to turn DSAI in. But what is this about you meeting Datuk Seri Najib the Deputy PM at that time before you made your report?

Saiful: (sounding exasperated) This has already been explained many times. I was there to seek my financial aid and get his advice on my future career.

TAXI DRIVER: You mean you could just drop in to see the Deputy PM at his house to ask for a get financial aidand get career guidance advice? How many people can do that?

Saiful: Anybody. Pak Najib is a very nice man. He is always ready to help. Anybody can knock on his door. Just try it if you don’t believe me.

TAXIDRIVER: In fact we’ve been trying to get an interview with Datuk Seri Najib for the past 6 months. But why do you need a financial aid when you’ve already dropped of college?

Saiful: Well, I was thinking of my insurance if anything wrong i took my friand with me but

he he gave an exclusive taped interview to RAJA PETRA (PETE).”.I NOTHING TO HIDE BUDDY YOU ASK ME ANYTHING I WILL ANSWER

TAXIDRIVER: It was also reported that you met a senior police officer, Senior Assistant Commissioner Rodwan at room 619 of the Concorde Hotel Shah Alam before you made a report.

Saiful: I was just seeking his advice on police procedure before I made my police report. I have to know what was going to happen.

TAXIDRIVER: But why meet in a hotel room? Why not in a police station?

Saiful: Are you crazy? This is Malaysia. A witness can go into the MACC office and go out from the window. Some go into a police station and come out in a body bag.

TAXIDRIVER: To be precise, you met SAC Rodwan on 25^th June, a day before the alleged sodomy which was on the 26^th June.

Saiful: So what? I know I was going to be sodomized again. I was just getting ready.

TAXIDRIVER: So why didn’t you set a trap for Anwar with video recording and police bursting into the room to catch him red handed? I’m surprised a police officer didn’t advice you to set a trap.

Saiful: Yeah, but I didn’t want to waste public money. Pak Najib said the country should save money.

TAXIDRIVER: OK, let’s talk about the day you made the police report on the 28^th of June. Why did it take you 2 days after the alleged act to make a report? Haven’t you already decided to report Anwar after meeting SAC Rodwan?

Saiful: Well, I was embarrassed and humiliated about going public. I was also traumatized by it so I thought it over for a couple of days.

TAXIDRIVER: But you were smiling and waving to the press after your police report.

Saiful: That was just for the TV cameras. I wanted to look handsome.

TAXIDRIVER: You also went to work the next day and attended a PKR function at Anwar’s house in the evening where Anwar was also present.

Saiful: I had to keep myself busy to take my mind off the traumatic incident.

TAXI DRIVER: Why did you send a friendly e-mail to Anwar to resign after he had allegedly sodomized you leaving you embarrassed, humiliated and traumatized?

Saiful: He was still my employer. I don’t want to burn my bridges. Maybe I may need a reference from him in future.

TAXIDRIVER: Why did you seek a medical examination at Pusrawi Hospital instead of going straight to the police?

Saiful: I thought I should get a medical report that my ass was violated to bolster my case.

TAXCIDRIVER: But the doctor reported that he found no signs of penetration.

Saiful: That stupid foreign doctor! He doesn’t know how things work in Malaysia. When you look into a hole you have to close one eye right? He should have closed one eye when he checked my hole.

TAXIDRIVER: So you went to a government hospital, HKL to make a police report and the police sent you for a medical examination by three specialists. It was widely reported that the report also came out negative.

Saiful: Aahhh…that is for me to know and for you to wonder. That medical report is still secret. Anwar’s lawyers tried to get it but the court refused. Heh! Heh!

TAXIDRIVER: Why not just release the report if it will support your case?

Saiful: I’ll leave it to my lawyers.

TAXIDRIVER: The prosecution claimed to have a DNA sample extracted from your rectum which implicates Anwar. How was that possible after 2 days?

Saiful: It’s possible because I didn’t shit for 2 days.

TAXIDRIVER: How did you manage to do it?

Saiful: It was tough but I had to do it. I ate as little as possible and didn’t allow myself to shit no matter what.

TAXIDRIVER: This doesn’t tally with medical knowledge. When the anal sphincter is loosened a person finds it hard to control his bowel movement. Practicing gays have to go to the toilet when they feel like it.

Saiful: Mine was loose but not that loose.

TAXIDRIVER: Wouldn’t it be easier to just go to the police immediately?

Saiful: Are you saying I’m lying?

At this moment, Muntaj’S daughter interjected, “Look, different people have different amount of shit. Some need to shit everyday, some every 2 days and some every 3 days. Understand?” This was intoned slowly like a profound revelation.

TAXIDRIVER: Understood. You’re full of…. Never mind. At the trial a tube of KY jelly was submitted as evidence. Didn’t you wash the KY jelly from your…err…asshole?

Saiful: I can’t wash away crucial evidence.

: So you didn’t shit and you didn’t wash your butt just to preserve the crucial evidence to nail Anwar. What an effort it must have been compared to just going to the police.

Saiful: Yes, I deserve a medal for my effort. Next question please.READMORE beautifully beastifull rosamah the director of sodomy2,so the begining of the persecution of Anwar

Saiful: What!? How dare you. My asshole is my private affair. I don’t reveal it to anybody calling himself a doctor. Get out! Get out of my house or I’ll say you sodomized me.

Sensing that the interview was over the team quickly packed their gear and made a quick exit with Saiful and his hurling abuses at them.

Filed under: Uncategorized

• 5:29 am 0

TAXIDRIVER’S WEBNETWORK’S EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH MUNTAJ’S FUTURE SON IN LAW SAIFUL

The state of Malaysian police and A.G ?READMORE“Sexual Politics, Malaysia Style”: The first charges again Anwar Ibrahim

The ‘Sodomy 2.0′ version unfolded on June 28 when PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim’s 23-year-old former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan lodged a police report. He claimed to have been sodomised by Anwar in a condominium in Damansara. To many, it was unreal. Ten years ago, Anwar had faced a similar charge which saw him being jailed until the conviction and sentence were overturned on appeal in 2004. In the latest episode, he was arrested on July 16 by balaclava-clad police – a scene reminiscent of that in 1998- but freed a day later after being questioned and made to undergo a medical examination.My legal team advised me that we should refer and compel the syariah court to instruct the prosecution to conduct their work professionally in accordance with the syariah law in Islam. What is so important of talking

about syariah law when you don’t respect the basic principles of the law?“They talk about syariah when it only seems to be convenient to them politically. Syariah must be abovepolitical, individual sentiments,” he told reporters at the Federal Territory syariah High Court here. Anwar claimed that the director of the Federal Territory Religious Department (Jawi) and the minister in the

Prime Minister’s Department are trying to sabotage the case read more click this Charge Najib,Ezam,Rosmah, charge them for abetting SAIFUL for making

a false report and causing all the trouble.Send them to jail

As the sodomy trial of Anwar Ibrahim grip the nation, TAXIDRIVER’S WEBNETWORK managed to secure an interview with his accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari who was anxious to dispel public doubts and reservations about his case. The interview was held in a posh condominium in an exclusive part of Kuala Lumpur. Also present was his FUTURE WIFE MUNTAZ ‘S DAUGHTER ANAK MAMI. The spacious condominium with a spectacular view of the city looked luxurious with polished granite flooring, Persian rugs, dazzling crystal chandeliers and expensive rococo style furniture with gold trimmings.

TAXI DRIVER: Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed. My, what a beautiful apartment. Is it yours?

Saiful: it comes with the package deal.

TAXIDRIVER: (looking at the personal photos on the wall).so it is yours. Anyway, let’s get down to business. By the way, we will be recording this interview on video. Is that alright with you?

Saiful: No problem, I want everybody to see how genuin IS MY ASSHOLE. Just make sure you broadcast it widely and distribute it to RTM, TV3, Astro and upload to Youtube.

TAXIDRIVER: Was that incident on 26 June 2008 the first time that Datuk Seri Anwar sodomized you?

Saiful: No! As I’ve said before, I’m been sodomized 8-9 times before. Poked here…poked there until I got fed up. There’s only so much sodomy a man can stand you know?

TAXIDRIVER: you mean to says that a 63 old man still has his rocket turbour charged?

ARE YOU A GAY?

Saiful: (sounding offended) Of course not! I have a fiancée you know? We’re going to get married and start a family when this case blows over.I mean MUNTAZ JAFFAR’daughter she is with me whatever it is ,she love me, I have that powerfull magnet to pull both man and woman .

Saiful: Well, he’s a very powerful person. He’s the opposition leader. I need do this, the way ezam and rosma want me to do and worried about losing my job.

TAXIDRIVER: yes , you were sent there to do this job, you have,YOU HAVE TO GET CLEARANCE

FROM YOUR REAL BOSS WHO IS ALSO BOSS TO MUNTAZ JAFFAR

Saiful: (rolling hi eyes) Well, ummm…ummm…he can get me arrested and beaten up? Maybe he can get Special Branch to come after me? Maybe even have me locked up under the ISA?

TAXI DRIVER: Come on now, Saiful. An opposition leader doesn’t have that power?

Saiful looked at for help. Saiful’s fiancée lean over and whispered in his ear.

Saiful: Of course you know, I was foolish and Anwar was my idol. I would do anything for him. When your idol asked you to bend over you would, right?

TAXI DRIVER: So are you saying it was consensual?

Saiful: No! No if I say consentral i will be arrested, It was against my will. I swear it!

Taxidriver: You’ve already done so in a mosque. But your college mates say you hated Anwar’s guts.

Saiful: Oh no, I loved Anwar’s guts. I was a super-secret admirer.

TAXIDRIVER: Normally a secret admirer doesn’t express the opposite but let’s leave that aside for the moment. Tell us what REALLY made you decide to go to the police after the last sodomy

Saiful: Well, after metting Rodwan at room 619 at concorde hotel here, gave me the strength and the inspiration. He said, “Saiful, look at you. You’re earning a miserable RM1000 a month. Imagine what you can have if you… (ouch!)” muntaz’s daughter giving Saiful a swift kick at his expensive asshole

Saiful: What I mean to say is that I can’t stand being poked any more. The pain, the humiliation, the disgust. I feel so…violated!

TAXIDRIVER: And so you decided to turn DSAI in. But what is this about you meeting Datuk Seri Najib the Deputy PM at that time before you made your report?

Saiful: (sounding exasperated) This has already been explained many times. I was there to seek my financial aid and get his advice on my future career.

TAXI DRIVER: You mean you could just drop in to see the Deputy PM at his house to ask for a get financial aidand get career guidance advice? How many people can do that?

Saiful: Anybody. Pak Najib is a very nice man. He is always ready to help. Anybody can knock on his door. Just try it if you don’t believe me.

TAXIDRIVER: In fact we’ve been trying to get an interview with Datuk Seri Najib for the past 6 months. But why do you need a financial aid when you’ve already dropped of college?

Saiful: Well, I was thinking of my insurance if anything wrong i took my friand with me but

he he gave an exclusive taped interview to RAJA PETRA (PETE).”.I NOTHING TO HIDE BUDDY YOU ASK ME ANYTHING I WILL ANSWER

TAXIDRIVER: It was also reported that you met a senior police officer, Senior Assistant Commissioner Rodwan at room 619 of the Concorde Hotel Shah Alam before you made a report.

Saiful: I was just seeking his advice on police procedure before I made my police report. I have to know what was going to happen.

TAXIDRIVER: But why meet in a hotel room? Why not in a police station?

Saiful: Are you crazy? This is Malaysia. A witness can go into the MACC office and go out from the window. Some go into a police station and come out in a body bag.

TAXIDRIVER: To be precise, you met SAC Rodwan on 25^th June, a day before the alleged sodomy which was on the 26^th June.

Saiful: So what? I know I was going to be sodomized again. I was just getting ready.

TAXIDRIVER: So why didn’t you set a trap for Anwar with video recording and police bursting into the room to catch him red handed? I’m surprised a police officer didn’t advice you to set a trap.

Saiful: Yeah, but I didn’t want to waste public money. Pak Najib said the country should save money.

TAXIDRIVER: OK, let’s talk about the day you made the police report on the 28^th of June. Why did it take you 2 days after the alleged act to make a report? Haven’t you already decided to report Anwar after meeting SAC Rodwan?

Saiful: Well, I was embarrassed and humiliated about going public. I was also traumatized by it so I thought it over for a couple of days.

TAXIDRIVER: But you were smiling and waving to the press after your police report.

Saiful: That was just for the TV cameras. I wanted to look handsome.

TAXIDRIVER: You also went to work the next day and attended a PKR function at Anwar’s house in the evening where Anwar was also present.

Saiful: I had to keep myself busy to take my mind off the traumatic incident.

TAXI DRIVER: Why did you send a friendly e-mail to Anwar to resign after he had allegedly sodomized you leaving you embarrassed, humiliated and traumatized?

Saiful: He was still my employer. I don’t want to burn my bridges. Maybe I may need a reference from him in future.

TAXIDRIVER: Why did you seek a medical examination at Pusrawi Hospital instead of going straight to the police?

Saiful: I thought I should get a medical report that my ass was violated to bolster my case.

TAXCIDRIVER: But the doctor reported that he found no signs of penetration.

Saiful: That stupid foreign doctor! He doesn’t know how things work in Malaysia. When you look into a hole you have to close one eye right? He should have closed one eye when he checked my hole.

TAXIDRIVER: So you went to a government hospital, HKL to make a police report and the police sent you for a medical examination by three specialists. It was widely reported that the report also came out negative.

Saiful: Aahhh…that is for me to know and for you to wonder. That medical report is still secret. Anwar’s lawyers tried to get it but the court refused. Heh! Heh!

TAXIDRIVER: Why not just release the report if it will support your case?

Saiful: I’ll leave it to my lawyers.

TAXIDRIVER: The prosecution claimed to have a DNA sample extracted from your rectum which implicates Anwar. How was that possible after 2 days?

Saiful: It’s possible because I didn’t shit for 2 days.

TAXIDRIVER: How did you manage to do it?

Saiful: It was tough but I had to do it. I ate as little as possible and didn’t allow myself to shit no matter what.

TAXIDRIVER: This doesn’t tally with medical knowledge. When the anal sphincter is loosened a person finds it hard to control his bowel movement. Practicing gays have to go to the toilet when they feel like it.

Saiful: Mine was loose but not that loose.

TAXIDRIVER: Wouldn’t it be easier to just go to the police immediately?

Saiful: Are you saying I’m lying?

At this moment, Muntaj’S daughter interjected, “Look, different people have different amount of shit. Some need to shit everyday, some every 2 days and some every 3 days. Understand?” This was intoned slowly like a profound revelation.

TAXIDRIVER: Understood. You’re full of…. Never mind. At the trial a tube of KY jelly was submitted as evidence. Didn’t you wash the KY jelly from your…err…asshole?

Saiful: I can’t wash away crucial evidence.

: So you didn’t shit and you didn’t wash your butt just to preserve the crucial evidence to nail Anwar. What an effort it must have been compared to just going to the police.

Saiful: Yes, I deserve a medal for my effort. Next question please.READMOREbeautifully beastifull rosamah the director of sodomy2,so the begining of the persecution of the malaysian opposition leader

Saiful: What!? How dare you. My asshole is my private affair. I don’t reveal it to anybody calling himself a doctor. Get out! Get out of my house or I’ll say you sodomized me.

Sensing that the interview was over the team quickly packed their gear and made a quick exit with Saiful and his IN COMING WIFE hurling abuses at them.

Filed under: Uncategorized

February 7, 2010 • 1:41 pm 0

Don’t bring the notions of accountability and transparency into this one-of-a-kind relationship.

YES, THEY “POPPED” THE CHERRY INSTEAD.

click this to readmore PRELUDE TO UMNO DISAPPEARING FROM THE FACE OF THIS EARTH

Received this in the email from an anonymous source. Even if it is true I just wish them good luck. The authorities still fail to see the honor in a fair fight. Never mind, bring in your imported cyber-troopers and thereby insulting your local-bred troopers who you have already by this action, labeled as impotent! Not nice lah to call your people useless, innit?

The email: I have reliable information that the recent visit to INDIA by Najib and delegates (UMNO/BN) is mainly to recruit IT professionals and hackers from India for a 3 year contract. It’s estimated that more than 200 will be recruited at MYR300 million per annum.)

Their only task is to jeopardize, intercept and disrupt blog sites and bloggers who are not government-friendly. Since they have a strong stranglehold on mass media whereas Internet and local blog media are out of government control, UMNO/BN out of desperation are going all out to weaken local anti-government blogs and bloggers by having these IT pros and hackers to infect viruses and trojans into individual IP addresses through TMnet and Celcom Internet service providers. Najib, Hishamuddin and Rais Yatim, along with a few UMNO/BN cabinet ministers had a closed door meeting with Telekom and Celcom top guns to discuss these matters before Najib left forIndia.

This is planned to affect login passwords, local publication access, slow down systems, and even to the extent of destroying data in hard disks if anyone accesses any anti-government blog sites and to prevent these from posting anti-government news.

This will not affect proUMNO blog sites due to the fact that the interception is based on IP and POP proxy addresses of individual sites and individual access. So, if you access pro-government blog websites, you won’t be affected. Out of desperation, UMNO/ BN will ensure that Malaysians won’t be able to access news from any anti-government blog portals and these websites won’t be able to publish the truth of their corrupt activities and strategies to topple the PR government in the Internet local access.

So will there be two standards on hacking – I alwasys thought hacking was a felony. no?

The email: I have reliable information that the recent visit to INDIA by GHANI PATAIL and delegates IS STUDY HOW THE INDIAN JUDGESOn February 13, in the first of the Nithari serial killing cases to be decided, a trial court pronounced death sentence on Moninder Singh Pandher for a murder that took place when he was far away in Australia. And for the murder of a girl who he did not even know. As the prosecution admitted, there was no evidence to suggest that it was at Pandher’s instance that his servant Surender Koli had raped and killed 14-year-old Rimpa Haldar, the victim who lived in a slum near his house. Yet, Pandher was held to be a conspirator mainly because his sexual profligacy was found to have brought out depravity in his servant.
There is also blackmailing going on. This particular Judge from Punjab & Haryana High Court who is allegedly being given a clean chit, had threatened that she alone is not involved and if persecuted she would expose all names. Is it not blackmailing?
Ø In my humble opinion, JUDICIARY IS THE CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY. IT IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD.
Ø Least educated or qualified people occupy the highest position in judiciary. I am sorry to say that many of Judges do not have basic knowledge of English to read, understand and interpret law.
Ø What we need is a common code of conduct for all public servants, be it bureaucracy, members of legislatures, elected representative, constitutional appointees, and Judges. They must declare their assets every year, criminal record, if any, so on and so forth.
Ø And lastly pardon my saying this, what about Journalists, Newspapers & Electronic Media. You are wise enough to appreciate what I mean. We cannot wait for another sixty years for freedom; it should come to us now, and we would get it.
Ø I have not said anything worse that what you have said for Prashant Bhushan.

We just don’t seem to get it. The normal standards of accountability don’t apply to judges. We are unable to grasp their argument that, much as it is desirable in other institutions, transparency in the judiciary will compromise its independence, a larger constitutional value. Hence, we persist with the folly of expecting judges to be swept away by the wave of transparency triggered by RTI.

This is evident from the two latest attacks on judges on July 17. First, this incorrigible sceptic, Prashant Bhushan, mobilised a statement from 25 eminent citizens denouncing a proposed Bill, which prohibits the declarations of assets made by judges to their respective chiefs from being made public. The statement fails to appreciate Law Minister Veerappa Moily’s sensitivity in coming up with a draft that reflects a consensus among judges. As if that were not bad enough, the statement is cheeky enough to suggest that, following the example of their American counterparts, our Lordships too should be transparent about their assets so that we could point out any “unusual accretion” or “false declaration”.

But it is not just civil society that is being irreverent to judges. For, the same day, just before shutting for the weekend, the Central Information Commission (CIC) released an order where it repeated its folly of trying to bring the Chief Justice of India under the ambit of RTI. It once again demolished the CJI’s position that he need not disclose any information lying in his custody as he was independent and distinct from the Supreme Court, which is a public authority under RTI.

It may be recalled that when CJI K G Balakrishnan had first taken this view about a year ago, it was very much in the context of declarations of assets. Since those declarations were in his custody, the CJI held then that the Supreme Court registry would not entertain any RTI queries concerning them. Yet, in its latest order in another case, the CIC defied the CJI saying, “The institution and its head cannot be two distinct Public Authorities. They are one and the same. Information, therefore, available with the Chief Justice of India must be deemed to be available with the Supreme Court of India.”

Like us, the CIC too doesn’t seem to get it. The general logic doesn’t apply to judges. When others take refuge in opacity, we are justified in suspecting that they are hiding corruption. But when judges wrap themselves in a veil of secrecy, we have to take it that they are actually doing so for our good, so that they are not distracted by allegations of corruption against themselves.

One way of coming to terms with this distinction is to re-adopt the outdated notion that king could do no wrong. Going by his logic, Justice Balakrishnan does seem to suggest some such blanket immunity to judges. If some judge has made an unusual accretion to his assets or has made a false declaration of them, it should be no cause for concern to us, the consumers of justice. It’s time we realised that judges have their inscrutable reasons. We should just be grateful to them for whatever justice they dispense to us, in their magnanimity and in their good time. Don’t bring the notions of accountability and transparency into this one-of-a-kind relationship.

On February 10, the Supreme Court threw out yet another petition seeking to reinstate L K Advani as an accused in the trial of the conspiracy to demolish Babri Masjid. This is despite a host of circumstances pointing to the probability of Advani, NDA’s prime ministerial candidate in the upcoming election, being involved in the conspiracy. Not the least of which was his notorious rath yatra in the run-up to the demolition. And the testimony of the IPS officer in charge of his security, Anju Gupta, stating that his speech on the spot minutes before the demolition had added fuel to the fire.

The two interpretations of criminal conspiracy could not have been more different: ultra liberal in the case of Advani and stretched in the case of Pandher. Neither interpretation seems justified in the given facts and circumstances. Both the interpretations raise questions about the rigor and detachment with which the judiciary at all levels performs its job.

THANKS TO ZORROW

RECENT developments in the judiciary has left an awful taste. Has this 1 Malaysia thing gone too far? Whose creation is it? Najib or Patai, or both? It is unacceptable when one man has just got to say it and the rakyat are expected to lap it up or lump it! The Royal Commission on the Lingam tapes declared:

1. The video clip was authentic;
2. Lingam was in conversation with Ahmad Fairuz over judicial appointments;
3. There was direct influence by Lingam in the elevation of judges, in particular in the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as president of the Court of Appeal, with the possible aim of his further appointment as chief justice; and;
4. Lingam had asked tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan and Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor to involve themselves actively in the appointment of judges, in particular the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as the Chief Judge of Malaya and subsequently, president of the Court of Appeal.
The commission identified six people to be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961, the Sedition Act 1961, the Legal Profession Act 1976, the Official Secrets Act 1972 and the Penal Code.
They are former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Lingam, Tan, Umno secretarygeneral Tengku Adnan, Eusoff Chin and Ahmad Fairuz.

And like the omnipotent trinity that they definitely are not, the AG Patai, Najib and Naxri rubbished off months of work by the commission, whose members have till now have not volunteered a whimper of dissent. It was a great party that night. The Chemistry Department was so pleased they had an airtight case against Anwar Ibrahim they decided to celebrate. And the RM25,000 party was financed by a Good Samaritan who was delighted that this time, unlike last time, they have got Anwar by the balls.

RM25,000 is not a lot to spend on a party if it is a party to celebrate the wedding of the Prime Minister. Last year, when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi got married to the Maid from Putrajaya, they spent millions. RM25,000 is also not a lot to spend on a celebration the day Najib Tun Razak finally takes over as Prime Minister in 2010. Rosmah Mansor spends more than that on a handbag. But RM25,000 is certainly a lot to spend on a party to celebrate the ‘success’ of the Chemistry Department in being able to nail Anwar’s balls to the wall.

Why does the Good Samaritan need to sponsor a RM25,000 party for the Chemistry Department staff? What is there to celebrate? Do they always celebrate with a RM25,000 party whenever they succeed in cracking a case? Or was this a once-in-a-lifetime celebration for successfully coming up with the ‘evidence’ to send Anwar to jail for at least ten years, which will ensure he will never be able to form the new federal government on 16 September 2008?

Hold on awhile though. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that Anwar must volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile. The 1998 DNA profile that the police have on record is ‘too old’, argued Abdullah. The police, in turn, said that if Anwar refuses to volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile then they would have to obtain a court order to force him to do so. Hmm…..there appears to be many things wrong with all this.

Firstly, if the Chemistry Department has already wrapped up its case and the airtight ‘evidence’ against Anwar has already been secured then why the need for Anwar’s new DNA profile? DNA profiles never expire. Would the police also need Anwar’s ‘new’ fingerprints because the one they took ten years ago has ‘expired’? Fingerprints never change from the day you were born till the day you die. And the same goes for DNA profiles as well.

If you can remember, they once dug up Napoleon Bonaparte’s grave and did an examination to prove he had died of arsenic poisoning. And Napoleon died on 5 May 1821, which is more than 187 years ago. You mean to say that Anwar’s DNA profile of ten years ago is already basi?

The truth is, the airtight ‘evidence’ that the Chemistry Department recently conjured is based on Anwar’s specimen of 1998. So they need a new specimen dated 2008. If not, if Anwar calls in an independent foreign expert to audit the Chemistry Department’s evidence, he or she might just discover that the so-called ‘evidence’ is actually ten years old and not from the 26 June 2008 ‘sodomy’ incident as alleged by the government.

Yes, that’s right, they not only can tell whether the so-called ‘semen’ on Saiful’s underwear belongs to Anwar, they can also tell whether it is from September 1998 when they first took Anwar’s specimen, or whether it is dated 26 June 2008 as alleged by the government.

The ‘evidence’ is ready. The semen specimen on Saiful’s underwear has been ‘confirmed’ as Anwar’s. The only problem is if they allow an independent foreign expert to do an audit on the Chemistry Department’s findings, he or she might confirm that the specimen is ten years old and not dated 26 June 2008 as alleged.

So they need to exchange the September 1998 specimen with a new one dated July 2008. And that is why Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Syed Hamid Albar, and all those others, have asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen. They need this new specimen to ‘prove’ that the semen on Saiful’s underwear is dated 26 June 2008 and not September 1998. And Abdullah himself ‘confirmed’ this when he asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen whereas the old specimen is good enough if it is just required for DNA profiling — only that it would not pass the test if an independent foreign expert was to audit the Chemistry Department’s ‘evidence’ and then come out with a report that says the specimen is ten years old.

Yes, in September 1998 they already took Anwar’s specimen. But they can’t use it as evidence in this latest sodomy allegation. They need to ‘update’ the evidence and unless they can force Anwar to give them his new specimen then the evidence will be shot full of holes. And that is why the police had to reluctantly release Anwar on police bail one day after his dramatic Hollywood-style arrest. They had to either release him or bring him to court to be charged. But how to charge Anwar when the evidence is defective? And evidence of Anwar’s so-called sodomy crime supported by a specimen from September 1998 will certainly be defective and will not stand up in court. Anwar is alleged to have sodomised Saiful on 26 June 2008, not in September 1998.

Now can you see how the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP work? And these two slithery creatures are the same slime-balls and scumbags who fabricated evidence in 1998 that resulted in Anwar having to spend six years in jail. And am I committing an act of sedition and criminal defamation in saying this? I certainly hope so. And, while we are at it, why not I commit yet another ‘crime’? I am going to accuse the AG and IGP of fabricating evidence and of intimidating witnesses.

You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.

Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.

The ‘evidence’ against Anwar is no good. They now need to look for another way to ‘prove’ that Anwar sodomised Saiful. In the meantime, let us see if the AG will be making another police report against me and whether the IGP is going to arrest me and charge me in court for sedition and criminal defamation for this latest allegation of mine.

Hey, I already face four charges of sedition and criminal defamation. What are another two or three charges? The important thing is not whether I get sent to jail or not. What is important is that the world is told that they are attempting, yet again, to fabricate evidence against Anwar Ibrahim. And that is worth going to jail for. Eusoff-Chin-holiday

related article private investigation agency’s probe into possible misconduct by Chief Justice Eusoff Chin, lawyer V.K. Lingam and business tycoon Vincent Tan.

And this is just one instance where one man, in this case, the AG has stamped NFA! And believe me there are more to come. It really has become incomprehensible that some men on the bench have morphed into impotent retarded tadpoles.

BE READY FOR THE CONTINUED BASTARDIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY, THAT IS IF WE THE RAKYAT ALLOWS IT.

An Exposition of the Way in which a Man may Discover the Faults in his Soul.

A MOB1900 CREATION

YES, Pete really is, so he told a visiting friend of my Mum. He is in stitches about being flown to the moon when in reality he is on a Mediterranean Cruise with a stopover at the Isle of Capri before he heads toward San Juan to catch the swallows of Capistrano on March 19. Whilst he is thoroughly tickled over his “catch me if you can” capers, I am reliably informed by a sponsor, that he feels irresponsible for having embarrassedd the Police Inspector General in this wild angsa chase! This is his way of saying “Sorry lah, stupid!”

OF course if you have the expertise and that attendant deviousness, everything can be staged. You just need some planning of course. But crucial to a successful staging of an event would be the purchase of a certain breed of accomplices who would for a price, sell their souls to the devil. NO, I got this wrong here…..selling your soul to the devil is just a figure of speech! The devil is not that cheap, and moreover what the hell does the devil in Hell needs money. Hell, combustion is free and eternal, so we are told, yes?

It is the devil incarnate, who walks amongst us…..the ones who will sell their father, mother, wives, sons and daughters and if the price is good, even their brothers an sisters for transitory gains equivalent to, I am told, a ponderous bout of ejaculation experienced after a period of forced abstinence. These would be the actors, stagehands easily available for a price to stage what the master-stager directs! And the master-stager has basketful of these willing accomplices amongst the fleas and lice that infest our police force, judiciary, election commission, macc, air force, even the registra of societies now, and of course the customs and immigration departments. Dang! Which government agencies can say that they have not participated in productions directed by the powers that be.

Here are some of our major mega productions:

Wasn’t Sodomy 1 an international box-office hit? (The “irrelevant” judge was not able to receive his Oscar. No! His demise was not staged. His shelf-life just expired.) Of course DSAI staged his own black eyes, what!

National

By Daniel W. Delaware

BANGKOK: Malaysia, always in the shadow of its sparkling city-state neighbour, now seeks, it seems, to draw the spotlight of world attention upon itself but for entirely the wrong reasons.

The lacklustre Hobson’s choice premier Mohammed Najib Tun Abdul Razak, who has been struggling to be taken seriously and continues to struggle mostly, in vain, to try and restore the dwindling fortunes of his party, is behaving like a rabbit caught in the headlights of a fast approaching vehicle.

Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad’s wish to see Malaysia join the first world seems to become more and more of a pipe dream. The good doctor’s feelings towards Mr Najib’s predecessor, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, are well known, and the appetite for interfering with the judiciary is said to have started with the good doctor; so unsurprisingly there has been a tumult of criticism from human rights groups concerning the latest trial, as Anwar Ibrahim’s last conviction was so publicly overturned by Malaysia’s highest court after a lengthy delay.

The question all serious Malaysia watchers are asking is: Why is this happening again? The last bungled attempt to remove Anwar from the political landscape ended in utter ignominy, and the Malaysian state was most certainly the loser. Well, the best guess seems to be the analogy of a drowning man grasping at straws, however hopeless, in order to survive, because as a political strategy another trial is totally bankrupt.

Interestingly, the one factor the plotters appear to have totally overlooked is the present incumbents of the White House and State Department. Both of these current office-holders are unlikely to stay silent if history repeats itself in how Anwar is dealt with. Thailand has recently felt the new realism of the current American administration when the US ambassador in Bangkok wrote a letter to the English-language press deploring the forced repatriation of Hmong refugees to Laos, a most unheard of action in diplomatic protocol.

The Malaysian regime seems to lack the sophistication and good grace to deal with successful opposition as it desperately tries to cling to power. Voters have already punished it at the ballot box and are likely to repeat the process again. A suspect verdict on Anwar will draw nothing but opprobrium from the world at large and pigeonhole the current regime as only slightly more sophisticated than the generals in Burma in how it deals with its opponents, but not that much.—The Nation READMORE of all the the the Yatin Piatu of ethics is talkig about Rais Yatim – is this ethical enough for you?

Filed under: Uncategorized

February 4, 2010 • 12:13 pm 0

RECYCLE Deja vu in sodomy charge ROSMA IF YOU HAVE GONE THRU WHAT ANWAR WENT THRU YOU WILL BE SELLING YOUR ASSHOLE WHOLESELL

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2009

Deja vu in sodomy chargeThe ‘Sodomy 2.0′ version unfolded on June 28 when PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim’s 23-year-old former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan lodged a police report. He claimed to have been sodomised by Anwar in a condominium in Damansara.

READ THIS EXCLUSIVE STORY BY THE TAXIDRIVER Rosmah has no time to entertain ‘wild allegations’ ALL SET JUDGES IN PLACE the untouchable beautifully beastifull rosamah sent Anwar Ibrahim to jail

will the untouchable beautifully beastifull rosamah sent Anwar Ibrahim to jail?

rosmah mansor

Mansor is unperturbed by the many wild allegations hurled against her by hostile parties.

beautifully beastifull rosamah the director of sodomy2,so the begining of the persecution of the malaysian opposition leader

If you think this is just Anwar’s problem, then, think again because if the justice system in Malaysia is damaged beyond repair, then, all Malaysians could be confronted with situations like Kugan, Anwar and a whole host of other abusive and life threatening occasions experienced by the less fortunate.

To many, it was unreal. Ten years ago, Anwar had faced a similar charge which saw him being jailed until the conviction and sentence were overturned on appeal in 2004.

In the latest episode, he was arrested on July 16 by balaclava-clad police – a scene reminiscent of that in 1998 – but freed a day later after being questioned and made to undergo a medical examination.

His supporters claimed that the government would detain him pending trial, ostensibly to prevent his campaigning for the Permatang Pauh by-election. But when Anwar claimed trial on Aug 7, he was freed on a RM20,000 personal bond.

Much else has happened outside the courtroom, including the allegation that Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had a ‘hidden hand’ in the matter since he had met with Saiful prior to the complaint. Najib has denied this.

In 1997, Anwar wanted to go after a senior minister, who had been colluding with local authorities to alienate land in Johor, Kedah, Langkawi and Sepang. Of course TUN MAHATHIR won’t have this happen to the then UMNO treasurer. In the 90s, the ACA and the AG opined that there was a case against Rafidah over the allocation of shares to her son-in-law. TUN MAHATHIR stopped the proposed prosecution. In the late 90s, the Director-General of the EPU was “caught” with a rather large bundle of cash in his office drawer by the ACA. Again, TUN MAHATHIR said “no” to the proposed prosecution.What would be different if the MACC had been in place at those times ?

THE DATES THAT EXPOSED THE MASTER CRIMINALS AT WORK

Everyone knows Pattail got promoted to AG

For his role in Anwar’s case for sodomy

Maha Shithead purposely brought him

To stop and kill Anwar Ibrahim

They now trying to do the same scenario

Najis, Musang, Pattail, bastards, the trio

Trying, again to do it all over

But round one went to Anwar’s favour

The judges have become brave and daring

Saying enough is enough to your raping

Of the court and the judiciary

With your repeated cases of sodomy

The exact dates Anwar received the support and assurance from the BN MPs cannot be ascertained by us. While, all these MPs have indicated support for Anwar, pending his return to Parliament, we can only approximate the beginning dates where initial negotiations were taking place, between end March 2008 and mid April 2008. This was the period immediately after the general election.

The master network of Mahathir is large! It spreads across the country. Their network has detected this movement from Anwar!

The criminals at work!

A clear picture of the crimes of these two evils are described here in the chronology of dates beginning 11th. May 2008.

11th. May 2008 – Najib met Mahathir (It is here the drama began, started by Mahathir in calling Najib a coward in April. The big evil engineered the small evil Najib to its front door. Needless to say the true drama that is going to be unfolded for the next few months began here, only to be polished later!)

The period between 12th May and 28th. June 2008, where all the make-up men, artists and props were designed to perfection to stage this truly Malaysian Mahathir-Najib drama! The drama needed to be staged fast to deprive Anwar from entering Parliament. On 19th. May, as per their master plan Mahathir left UMNO, together with Sanusi, etc. This created much interest amongst Malaysians and the international community, distracting every one from the actual complex drama that is being staged by Najib.

29th. June 2008 – Police report was filed by Saiful. Anwar took shelter at the Turkish Embassy. The international community condemned the police report. Their first drama nearly backfired. While the proof of innocence falls on Anwar’s shoulder, the enemy is not waiting to waste time on this anymore, because the rest will be taken care of by their junior conspirators, to ensure that Anwar will be forever distracted and remain engaged in the framed-up sodomy.

16th. July 2008 – The enemies arrested Anwar and locked him up overnight. This was the day Anwar supposed to announce the resignation of his wife from the parliamentary seat. It was shelved. The world condemned and too many voices called for the release of Anwar. They had no choice. Anwar was released the next day. The criminal’s first plan backfired completely. Please note that the criminals were aware of Anwar’s every move, while Anwar was totally ignorant of plots against him. This is how all action-packed dramas are staged. We the people, the innocent fools watch silently not knowing whether there was a drama in the first place. We are always distracted by these criminals, who are so used to get what they want from us. They always show us their good side. This is what we call a plot within another plot! They will be at their best, when they engineer the worst!

31st July 2008 – Wan Azizah informed the press that she is resigning as a member of parliament.

6th August 2008 –The date of nomination and election was announced by the Election Commission. The enemies also announced that Anwar must appear at the police station, on 7th August, to formally charge him on the sodomy case. The criminals were planning again one more time before Anwar file in his nominations. This time to bury his political career once and for all. And lock him up for good after the formal charge.

“This is the actual time the criminals were furious with Raja Petra. Raja Petra became their deadliest enemy for releasing Dr Osman’s SD on the same day at the point of arrest. Their plot again failed. Failed miserably. Anwar was saved by Raja Petra on this very crucial date. As expected on 7th August, Anwar was formally charged, but not detained in the lock-up.”

10th August to 25th August 2008 – The criminals were trying very hard to destroy Anwar’s political career between these dates. Anwar was alerted and our postings were featured in Malaysia Today warning Anwar of the plot to disqualify him on technical errors on his nomination papers. Anwar engaged another proxy should he be disqualified. Attempts were made on that day to disqualify Anwar, but the criminals got frighten after seeing

Anwar’s huge crowd. The BN government brought its entire government machineries to canvass at Permatang Pauh. A foreign journalist told us; practically the capital of Malaysia was shifted to Permatang Pauh during these dates. Leaving the Parliament as a white elephant without MPs to transact its normal business. It was unprecedented in Malaysian election history. Mahathir’s silence during this canvassing period was telling. For he and he alone knew, no way Anwar can be defeated in his home turf. Those who try are fools indeed! Najib headed this election campaign. The only catch phrase the entire leadership of UMNO was coached to speak about was sodomy, not their election agenda. Umno leaders and members were fools not knowing what game was being played by these two evils, except Tengku Razaleigh and Abdullah Badawi, for they knew too well what happens when these two evils get together.

Swearing and more swearing. While the testimony of Romlan did help, the entry of Tok Guru Nik Aziz during the last days of canvassing despite his illness changed the entire scenario. We believe this is the point of time Tok Guru knew what was really happening and what the evils were up to. Anwar won by a huge majority. Huge cracks appeared in the criminals’ next course of actions. But they were not defeated by their cruel fantasies!

The evils plot on the night of defeat!

On this night of defeat, the criminals plotted to ban access to Malaysia Today and other “offensive” websites. They have to put a permanent stop to the ever increasing “danger” of Raja Petra and gangs. They started with Malaysia Today. The cries of the people went louder! Friends, please note that no one has accepted claim to this evil action so far! Each is trying to protect another, for they too are fools manufactured under Mahathir’s factory! The proprietor of this factory may have changed, but the products manufactured remain the same!

The most sickening move of all is to plot to revise the budget of this country. To revise budget 2009 to appease Sabah and Sarawak. What sort of evils are these, running this country at the whims and fancies of their crooked minds! Don’t they have a limit to their nonsense! Or they need to transgress all boundaries of morality to achieve their twisted aims! These are true evils at work!

28th. August 2008 – Anwar was sworn in as a member of parliament. Najib and Abdullah were absent. Perhaps this was the first day Mahathir looked really an outcast, with Anwar inside the parliament. Najib turned up only the next day, being the Budget day. That was the first time in the history of Malaysia; the budget was revised during the last moment to fit in the development programme for Sabah and Sarawak. This we knew was the work of Najib misleading Abdullah, the day before when both were absent in the parliament house. Najib was being educated well. Mahathir knew from the beginning that Anwar had the numbers. All these MPs would defect only if Anwar becomes an MP. Mahathir and Najib were plotting this game well. But Anwar is not stupid this time. He already prepared a much better reform programme which is more workable to the current and future well-beings of Malaysia. Anwar criticized Abdullah’s budget for lacking competitiveness, which our economists agree.

5th September 2008 – Dr Osman appeared in front of the media for the first time. This has shaken Najib, a little. The criminals need to plan for their next course of action, but have to cover their tracts too. This is the delay they cannot afford. He knew now there is no way to implicate Anwar, bearing in mind that Anwar was also privy to KL General Hospital (2nd report), which Anwar declared during election campaigning.( Incidentally, the second report has also nullified Anwar from any wrong-doing.)

Najib’s anger naturally would turn to Raja Petra as the main culprit who seems to be a constant stumbling block to all his grand plans. It was Malaysia Today which released the SD first. Najib knew unlike the private investigator’s SD, he cannot fix up the SD of Dr. Osman this time around, because he already appeared in public to attest to the SD he made!

5th September to 10th September 2008 – This is the most crucial dates in their next grand plan. Their constant companion and an excellent scapegoat. Muhyiddin met up (the evil word is summoned) with Mahathir. Their grand plan is to get rid of Abdullah. And they also need to fix up Anwar, by transferring Anwar’s case to the High court. They need to kill several birds but with many stones, unfortunately they aren’t many left. Transferring the case to high court would be an easy plan, as Abdul Gani Patail is their own guardian at law. This is also the dates where Muhyiddin was instructed to inform Najib to proceed with their last game plan, to convince Abdullah to implement the Operasi Lallang in disguise (Mahathir’s specialty, in times of duress.) Main target Anwar and Raja Petra. Strongest weapon, Islam and condemnation of leaders for Raja Petra. Threat of national security and financial security for Anwar. This factory does not seem to run out of product lines! But for how long!

The scheming Najib, with suggestions from the evil, Mahathir, also need to ensure that if everything else fails, his only recourse is time, which is falling short. His back-benchers club must be sent out to an unknown nation to study new techniques of producing newer products, which they need badly, as the product lines needed to be improved constantly with changing taste and time.

10th September 2008 – Anwar’s legal team was taken by surprise, not knowing that the prosecutors planned to transfer the case to high court. The case was fixed for 24th September. Hearing completed. Judgment from Justice Komathy on 7th October 2008., in favour of Anwar. The case will remain in the lower court.

But on this same date 10th September. Muhyiddin made an announcement that Mahathir is interested in joining Umno, and the evil Mahathir made the same announcement. They always make “good” announcements in Malaysia to distract Malaysians from their crooked plots! This is a part of their grand strategy, protecting Najib, as otherwise Abdullah would not be happy. The crooked Najib must always be seen as neutral in these criminals’ grand plan. Abdullah is a sacrificial cow in Najib’s hand, when comes to implementations of tougher actions. He is a scapegoat used by Khairy for monetary issues of the government. A sleepy head Prime minister. Always dream big but poor in implementing all that he wants. A crook with his own boundary! A flip-flop man with a flip-flop team! All he needs, comforts and luxuries with no work done.

11th September 2008 – This is the most important date of the evil calendar. How many of the evils have met up, we don’t know. Probably 5 to 7. We can tell you there are police, law and order, and BN leaders. We are not naming them, we are not certain completely.

1) To create confusion, instigating racist sentiments amongst people so that Anwar’s agenda of taking over the government will not materialize. Any pea-sized brain will tell you; this is the specialization area of Khir Toyo! What a gift in waiting with Kelana Jaya gathering around the corner! Did he attend the meeting?

2) To arrest Raja Petra and detain him for good under ISA. Any pea-sized brain will tell you; this is a moment of opportune for Syed Hamid who is yet to reply to Raja Petra’s letter seeking indemnities. (Raja Petra’s letter was sent on 9th Sept, with ultimatum for action by 12th Sept). Did he attend the meeting?

3) To detain Teresa Kok, Sin Chew reporter (last minute added in, because Ahmad Ismail camp was not happy that he alone was punished) under ISA. This is their style. The government of the day can be run even by racist crooks, if their power base seems threatened in any way! These arrests are needed to create confusions and anger so that the public can take to the streets. Easing the way for interested parties to clamp down the country with an emergency rule! Any pea-sized brain will tell you, if all the arms of government are working together, they must have the yes man, Ismail Omar, to tag along. Did he attend the meeting!

4) To arrest Anwar Ibrahim under ISA. The original date of his arrest planned immediately after Raja Petra’s arrest and before the Kelana Jaya gathering. If this does not work, then Khir Toyo specialist in monkey tricks can carry on with his act in the KL streets and if he fails there is a big circus waiting for him at Kelana Jaya! But to arrest Anwar, they have to face the condemnation of international communities. Were they prepared for it? Arrest they must! Any pea-sized brain can tell you that to arrest Anwar Ibrahim; you need the go-ahead from the two top men! Did Abdullah and Najib attend the meeting?

Raja Petra was arrested as planned on the 12th September, together with the other two. Huge outcries from the people and opposition leaders followed. Sin Chew reporter was released the next day, after a flip-flop announcement by Syed Hamid! The followers of orders normally are not experts in covering their tracts! Anwar must be arrested at all cost. More cries from the people and opposition leaders followed, including from their own camp, probably these off mould products do not conform to their “stringent” standards! The criminals plan backfired. Khir Toyo’s plans too never succeeded! Huge outcries from the people but no one took the street! Khir began to know for the first time in his life, the other side of people’s power! The pale face of him shows! BN leadership headed by Najib deputized by Abdullah (this is how the world perceive), feared for the first time. Mahathir too, we were told, true to his crocodile fashion, sheepishly condemned the ISA. What a splendid act! The evil engineer who brutalized the nation for 22 years suddenly realized ISA is cruel! What he did no tell, he has seen and thought worst than that. His twisted-leftist-Mugabe brain constantly churning and scheming evils non-stop, suddenly ran short of “ideas”!

The arrest of Anwar was called off just for a while, while these two “geniuses” paused for a moment, with their MPs having learnt much in Taiwan, planning to study casinos in Macao!

The change of government that was announced by Anwar never took place on 16th. September 2008.

This is the pause the criminals needed for a moment to focus on the removal of Abdullah. This is the reason why the criminals have spared Anwar for a moment.

But Raja Petra must always remain under detention. If Raja Petra is released, then he will destroy all their evil plans. The criminals know this well.

17th September 2008 – Najib became the Finance Minister. Is Abdullah so kind to switch the portfolio or Najib was taking instruction to take over the finance ministry. Muhyiddin on the other hand, under instruction from evil Mahathir, to press Abdullah to bring forward Badawi’s stepping down date. Which Abdullah did, and announced he will step down in March. This announcement was made recently.Are we fools to believe that Raja Petra’s case was adjourned for a long period of time until November 12, because the trial judge was too sick? Or Raja Petra must be kept away for a long period of time, for other “valid” reasons. But he must be kept away, like it or not! He is too dangerous when he is outside!

We will not comment on any event after 20th September, as a new set of events are unfolding. We are keeping track closely. Suffice to say at this time that Mukhriz will lose the election of Youth leader because Mahathir said so! If Mahathir says, then it is always true!

It is only Mahathir and Najib who know, the next game plan! Maybe there are others involved too in this scheme designed by the master conspiraAs long as the government is prepared to sign blank checks, the Malays may call themselves supreme but they’ll always be counted among the the dismal progress of their ethnic group. 30% is not a big deal and I don’t think any Chinese Malaysian begrudge them of that. And if those who have benefited from the NEP have been responsible citizens and go on to grow and multiply as all good stewards should, they would not The problem with all our Malay supremacist politicians is that they’re too dumb to understand the reason for only have met the 30% target. They would have far exceeded it. Instead, the BN government and its kind give them a blank check. I don’t need to be a Malay, but if I have an endless supply of blank checks, I’d be quite happy to splurge several millions on sheer indulgence. Why should I work my butt off when I can play in the world’s playground of the rich?

The And it’s not surprising that the author thinks some kind of dictatorship is good for Malaysia. We’ve had 22 years of Mahathir. We should not have to go through the same nightmare again. Yes we did grow, but it’s all physical, and fleeting. We have failed to develop our most precious assets – human capital – which took flight and are still taking flight – perhaps more vigorously than cash belonging to foreign investors.

Brave ones with CONSCIENCE and INTERGRITY display their individuality and independence of spirit and mind. They CANNOT BE SUBDUED with intimidation and threats .SYABAS to Zaid and Yong for their open support of PKR AND PKATAN by their presence.

Saiful’s complaint was challenged when a medical examination – done on the same day he lodged the police report – allegedly found no signs of sodomy.

He then swore on a Quran in a mosque to back his claim, but the shadow of political interference fell over this as well. The imam who witnessed the oath-taking said he was instructed to do so.

WHAT’S NEXT: The sodomy trial has not made much headway since August, as technical arguments have prevailed. The court is expected to hear the substantial arguments in the coming year.

Clash of the titans

Wouldn’t something be amiss in Malaysian politics if the nation’s top two leaders aren’t pitted against one another? The year did not disappoint in this respect.

BN’s disastrous showing in the March general election brought out a metaphorical keris in Umno – this time the business end of it was pointed at party president and premier Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Initially, it was unclear who was holding the dagger, given the groundswell of discontent over the coalition’s ‘gift’ to the opposition – four state governments, failure to re-take Kelantan and voters’ rejection of many veteran leaders.

Although ‘undur Pak Lah’ messages appeared on banners in public, Abdullah’s decimated team backed his leadership. Former party head Dr Mahathir Mohamad merely intensified the noisy bombardment from the sidelines.

Abdullah came undone when the economy came under pressure due mainly to the spike in global crude oil price and the US credit crunch. There was no hiding the resentment now.

Adding to the panic, PKR’s Anwar Ibrahim drummed up his claim of being able to take over the federal government by Sept 16. With Umno due to hold elections in December, the tussle at the top fed into the bickering at the bottom.

Abdullah finally reacted, swapping his finance portfolio for Najib’s defence portfolio and holding out the lure of direct transition to his deputy. It might have worked except that Umno vice-president and senior minister Muhyiddin Yassin took exception to the cosy arrangement.

On Sept 21, at the Umno supreme council meeting, Abdullah was confronted by the very leaders who had supported him. They pushed him to state by Oct 9 if he planned to contest the polls, before the nomination process began.

In what appears to be a face-saving move, although Abdullah claimed that it was done to prevent the rift from widening, a compromise was struck with Najib.

Polls were moved to March and Abdullah agreed to relinquish the presidency – by convention, also the premiership – to Najib if the latter had enough support in the party. Najib took the post uncontested, with 98 percent of the nominations.

WHAT’S NEXT: There is trepidation about a return to the dark days of ‘Mahathirism’ under Najib’s tenure, alongside talk that the out-manoeuvred Anwar is only biding his time to let the latter’s skeletons out of the closet. Muhyiddin’s moves merit a close watch as well.

Anwar completes his comeback

The Aug 26 Permatang Pauh by-election was called after incumbent Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail of PKR vacated the parliamentary seat, so that her husband Anwar Ibrahim could return to active politics.

Dubbed as the ‘mother of all by-elections’, it was held at a time of intense speculation about a takeover of the federal government by Pakatan Rakyat through defections from ruling lawmakers.

The contest was hyped by PKR as Anwar’s ‘road to Putrajaya’, possibly as a morale booster for more BN parliamentarians to cross over to the opposition alliance.

Anwar had held the seat from 1982 but was unable to contest the 1999, 2004 and 2008 general elections due to his conviction for corrupt practice and subsequent five-year ban on participation in active politics. The prohibition was lifted in April this year.

During the 10-day campaign, BN played up the sodomy allegation against Anwar but PKR pulled out its trump card at the eleventh hour when an imam admitted that he was instructed to witness an oath-taking ceremony by accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

The campaign saw money pouring into the constituency from both BN and PKR.

Anwar made a triumphant return with a bigger majority of 15,671 over his rivals – BN’s Arif Shah Omar Shah and Akim president Hanafi Hamat – and was sworn in as Opposition Leader in Parliament.

WHAT’S NEXT: Watch the Jan 17 Kuala Terengganu by-election, the second since the general election in March. Will the BN make an impact or will it see the loss of another seat?

Public whipping for BN

When Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi announced the dissolution of the Parliament on Feb 13, many BN politicians thought that the 12th general election would see the ruling coalition retaining its two-thirds majority in Parliament.

However, Malaysians decided otherwise on March 8 after a 13-day campaign, and deprived BN of its majority in the House. The opposition won 82 out of 222 parliamentary seats, with an all-time high of 31 seats for PKR, 28 for DAP and 22 for PAS.

Equally devastating for them was that opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat won four states and retained Kelantan – all of it contributing to BN’s worst results in electoral history.

BN partners MCA, Gerakan, MIC and PPP all suffered heavy defeats, with casualties including their national leaders. Umno, which had claimed that it could win enough seats to form the federal government on its own, only won 79 seats, falling way below its projection.

Voters dealt the telling blow because of issues such as inflation, shortage of goods, fuel subsidies, rising crime, mismanagement, corruption, tainted elections and racial inequality.

Simmering anger among Indian Malaysians – long regarded as BN loyalists – resulted in a swing towards the opposition.

WHAT’S NEXT: PM-NAJIB Abdul Razak can expect a torrid time when he takes over in March, as he faces not just political turmoil but economic uncertainty – not to mention a waiting Anwar Ibrahim.

Filed under: Uncategorized

• 4:35 am 0

HOMEGROWN RADICALS Complacency is not an option

The American Muslim community should not brush aside facts by either taking a defensive posture or by being apologetic. The better path is to conduct honest soul searching and enact proactive measures that can avoid such attention grabbing headlines in the first place.

BY PARVEZ AHMED, FEBRUARY 3, 2010

Bad for our image

JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA

An army major at Fort Hood guns down fellow soldiers, five young men arrested after traveling to Pakistan to join radical elements, a coffee vendor charged in a New York terror plot and a terrorism suspect in North Carolina is arrested. Such headlines involving American Muslims ought to be a source of concern for the community. A recent scholarly report (PDF) by researchers at Duke University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill asserts that the number of American Muslims vulnerable to radicalization is small but not negligible. Since 9-11, 139 American Muslims have committed terrorist acts or have been convicted or charged with terrorism. Less than one-third successfully executed their violent plots, with a majority of these violent acts being committed overseas.

The American Muslim community should not brush aside these facts by either taking a defensive posture or by being apologetic. Saying that only a handful of American Muslims are involved in terrorism while the vast majority of the community are productive citizens or asserting that America’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the source of such radicalization, while true does not solve the problem at hand. The better path for the community will be to conduct honest soul searching and enact proactive measures that can avoid such attention grabbing headlines in the first place.

In an ideal world, the misguided action of a few individuals will not invite scrutiny on the broader community. But we live in a world where the fear and misunderstandings about the Muslim community is pervasive. A recent survey by the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies found 53 percent of Americans view Islam unfavorably with 6 in 10 Americans reporting that they know little about Islam. While other religious extremists are portrayed as being outside the mainstream, terrorists who happen to be Muslims are characterized as representatives of their religion. Dalia Mogahed , executive director of the Gallup Center said to Bloomberg News, “Where a deranged person of a certain faith commits a crime in the name of their faith, we look at these incidents as someone misinterpreting faith. When a terrorist commits an act of violence in the name of Islam, it is often times framed as being devoted to the faith rather than being deviant.”

The Duke-UNC report (PDF), while raising concern, commends the American Muslim community for the steps it has taken thus far to limit radicalization of its youth. These steps such as public and private denunciation of terrorism, nipping extremist ideas at their bud, social networking, and political engagement have been helpful but need of further enhancement for better sustainability. Among the ideas (not necessarily new or radical) that the community can use to prevent future radicalization are:

1. Political Mobilization – Increased political mobilization will stunt domestic radicalization by providing, “an example to Muslims around the world that grievances can be resolved through peaceful democratic means.” American Muslims should use their social gatherings to mobilize politically. Merely demanding inclusion in the political process is not enough. No politician or political party will take the community seriously unless the community can demonstrate that they have the ability to deliver votes, money or both. Instead of presenting issues as “Muslim-centric” the community will be better served by making their advocacy “issue-centric.” This will allow the community to gather allies across faith-groups who also have similar concerns. A broader coalition will increase the chances of success and success will draw out more members of the community to rally behind common causes. Success will also remove the cynicism that often permeates the community.

2. Relationship with Law Enforcement – The community has made efforts to improve relationship with law enforcement. Such efforts need to be sustained and enhanced. The American Muslim community has legitimate concerns about law enforcement’s use of informants and agent provocateurs. However, these concerns cannot be addressed by cutting-off relations. If fact, the opposite needs to be done. Besides seeking regular dialogue with law enforcement, the American-Muslim community needs to encourage its youth to seek careers in law enforcement. Asking the FBI to include more members of the community in its Citizen’s Academy will also be a step in the right direction.

3. Access – Sections of the American Muslim community consist of people who are immigrants, who may struggle to provide their families with basic necessities due to poor English language skills or lack of higher education. Parents often work double or triple shifts to make ends meet with little time to spend with their children, particularly the youth. This makes them vulnerable to unsavory social networks. The American Muslim community, in partnership with public agencies, need to provide, “community-building resources such as youth centers, childcare facilities, public health clinics, and English as a Second Language courses (Duke-UNC report).” This can mitigate any propensity towards radicalization.

4. Religious Discourse – The Duke-UNC report asserts, “Muslim-Americans with a strong, traditional religious training are far less likely to radicalize than those without such training.” The community must invest in developing institutions that can teach Islam in a holistic way. In addition, there is an urgent need to review the types of lectures and khutbas being delivered at the local mosques. This is not to say that contemporary Islamic discourse in American Islamic centers is radicalizing Muslim youth. However, it is safe to say that the contemporary Islamic discourse in American Islamic centers is often too esoteric for the youth to find relevance to their day-to-day life. Religious consciousness is not possible without a social ethic. Thus religious discourse instead of being consumed with the trivial issues of halal (permissible) or hilal (moon crescent) should tackle issues that are contemporary to living in America. This will allow young people to appreciate that the solutions to their many problems can be found within their faith, creating a more positive attitude towards their faith and their country.

A recent publication titled, “Building Bridges to Strengthen America,” (PDF) produced by the Muslim Public Affairs Council, cites a study (PDF) by Quintan Wiktorowicz outlining a path to radicalization. Knowing these steps can help the community and families spot trouble before they become a nightmare.

The first step towards radicalization is usually socio-economic-political discontent often precipitating a personal crisis that Wiktorowicz describes as, “…shakes certainty in previously accepted beliefs and renders an individual more receptive to the possibility of alternative views and perspectives.” The identity crisis leads to seeking answers. People may find comfort in religion using a variety of methods such as personal social networks or the internet. If the seeker consciously or inadvertently were to engage with members of any extremist movement then the chances of radicalization increases as the, “[extremist] movement members attempt to convince seekers that the movement ideology provides logical solutions to pressing concerns.” Successful recruitment occurs because individuals are ignorant of or lack access to mainstream religious knowledge. Empirical studies show that most terrorists lack religious knowledge and were secular individuals until just before joining an extremist group (see Marc Sageman’s, Leaderless Jihad).

In the final phase, the recruit internalizes the ideology of the extremist group. Sustaining this state of mind requires isolating the individual from mainstream society. Radicals are often aloof, angry and excessively critical of society. Instead of seeking solutions to problem, they engage in the blame game, often making simplistic and stereotyping accusations that they themselves loathe when directed at their faith or community. An important caveat – not all people who are aloof, angry or excessively critical are necessarily radicals.

In a study (PDF) by the Dutch Clingendael Centre for Strategic Studies, the author provides a way to measure social integration (arguing that better social integration can reduce chances of being radicalized). The study asserts that there are ten social factors, which are necessary for social integration. The factors are:

1. Acceptance – an individual’s perception for being accepted in society.

2. Welcome – an individual’s feeling of being welcomed or warmly greeted by society.

3. Integration – an individual’s involvement in activities outside of their own ethnic or religious groups.

4. Entitlement – an individual’s feelings about their citizenship rights.

5. Equal Opportunity – an individual’s perception of fairness in their professional life.

6. Social Access – an individual’s feeling about being accepted in or have easy access to local clubs, sporting groups etc.

7. Loyalty – an individual’s loyalty or allegiance towards their country of residence.

8. Citizenship Pride – an individual’s satisfaction in being a member of the national community.

9. Social Values – an individual’s attitude towards social values, such as freedom, human rights, etc., of the broader society.

10. Language – an individual’s fluency in the local language of the country they reside in.

Scoring low on these factors increases the risk of radicalization. As is seen from these factors, the propensity to radicalize is a multifaceted and complex process. Community members need to proactively institute programs that allow young American Muslims to develop positive attitude towards their society. Some of these factors are outside the control of the community. And yet, if and when a problem surfaces, members of the community should engage with relevant agencies that can provide relief. For example, if a person feels that they are being discriminated in their jobs or badly treated when they go to the local gym, the community should seek immediate redress, understanding that the law is on their side. Brushing aside these grievances only makes the problem worse. Redressing grievances can engender positive feelings towards citizenship and foster loyalty.

Throughout his life, before and after the Prophetic mission, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) participated in many just causes without regard to who initiated that good action. To Prophet Muhammad, the principles were more important than who initiated a good action. He did want to establish a tribal order. He wanted to establish a system of governance based on justice and a social order based on compassion. Here are three examples of Prophet Muhammad’s inclusive and egalitarian vision:

1. The Fujjar War (this was before Muhammad was a prophet): This war was waged against some Arab tribes who violated the sacredness of Makkah in the sacred months. The sanctity of Kaabah was a tradition the Makkans had inherited from the upright religion of Prophet Abraham. This fight lasted for four years, and the Prophet’s age at that time was around 15-19 years. He participated in this war side by side with his uncles. He defended his community from danger and he did so out of his sense that he should share in defending his homeland and fight off aggression and injustice.

2. Hilf Al-Fudul (The Pact of the Virtuous): A pact was reached in the house of Abdullah bin Jud`an. One of the principles outlined in this pact was that all the tribes who signed on to this pact will come to the defense of any person in Makkah who is oppressed or subjected to injustices. And they will do so regardless of the social status or ethnic origin of the victim. Later in his life, when Muhammad became a prophet he said (i.e. while referring to this alliance): “If I am invited to join a similar (alliance) now (after the spread of Islam), I will, surely, join it.” The Prophet’s participation in Al-Fudul Alliance reveals the positive attitude he took, for he considered himself part and parcel of the Makkan society, the community where he lived, where he earned his living from and expected die. He was eager to participate in good causes that benefited the society regardless of who initiated the action.

3. The Prophet’s Response to SOS Calls: It is reported that during the time of Al-Hudaibiyah peace treaty, the Prophet was informed that a famine had afflicted the Makkan people, the same people who had driven him out of his home and killed members of his family. But upon hearing the humanitarian disaster that befell even his enemies, he sent Hatib bin Abi Balta’a with 500 dinars to buy foods for the poor and the needy among the Makkans.

Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) remembered God Almighty by engaging in the service of God’s creations. He served God, by serving his fellow human beings.

Despite the many setbacks on civil liberties, America remains a land of the free. Muslims must use this freedom to effectively respond to the vigorous challenges to some of their deeply held beliefs. While speaking out against perceived affront to their religion or way of life they must uphold the right of others to offend without backing down from seeking ways to defend their own rights. This, of course, entails an unequivocal commitment to the rule of law. Citizens have the right to protest unfair treatment; and when they believe the law is unjust, they should work to change such laws. Promising integration lies in civic participation and political mobilization. Random violence targeting innocent civilians is immoral and ineffective. It can never be justified no matter how severe the underlying grievance. This message needs to be reinforced from the mosque pulpit to the kitchen table.

Parvez Ahmed, Ph.D., is a U.S. Fulbright Scholar and Associate Professor of Finance at the University of North Florida. He is also a frequent commentator on Islam and the American Muslim experience. This article was originally written for Message International.

Print-friendly | Email this | Digg this | Tweet this | Share on Facebook

HOMEGROWN RADICALS Complacency is not an option
The American Muslim community should not brush aside facts by either taking a defensive posture or by being apologetic. The better path is to conduct honest soul searching and enact proactive measures that can avoid such attention grabbing headlines in the first place.

Filed under: Uncategorized

February 3, 2010 • 11:55 pm 0

The UMNO pimp Nasir Safar says the early Indian immigrants to Malaya beggars and the Chinese prostitutes

Yes, that man in the blue Proton Saga was Nasir Safar. But the police, who took Bala’s statement, denied it and said that it was a resident from that area and not Nasir Safar. How did the police know this immediately without any further investigation and without taking Nasir Safar’s statement?

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The Special Officer to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, Nasir Safar, has been asked to resign for calling the early Indian immigrants to Malaya beggars and the Chinese prostitutes. But that is not the icing on the cake. The icing on the cake is that Nasir Safar was the man mentioned in item 30 of PI Bala’s Statutory Declaration:

“Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.”

You can read the full text of Bala’s Statutory Declaration below.

Now, why would the Prime Minister’s Special Officer be at the scene of the crime? Was it to see for himself that Altantuya is arrested and quickly disposed off?

So that would make two of Najib’s staff involved in the Altantuya murder, the other being his ADC, Musa Safri, who was never called to testify at the Altantuya murder trial.

Do you remember Norhayati Hassan, Rosmah’s ADC? Weren’t she and her husband, Abdul Aziz Buyong, not also involved in the murder? Their senior officer in the army confirmed that he had trained this husband and wife team on how to handle C4. Is that a coincidence, circumstantial evidence, or maybe merely a lie by RPK and Malaysia Today?

Earlier, we published the police guard logbook that showed two unnamed military officers going into Najib’s house around midnight the night Altantuya died and they did not exit until dawn the following morning.

Okay, were they sitting on Rosmah’s sofa from midnight to dawn just chitchatting or did they actually leave in Rosmah’s car to go somewhere, whereby no logbook entry was made? And if they left the house in Rosmah’s car, then where did they go and what did they do over those five to six hours?

Yes, the plot thickens. First it was Najib’s ADC, Musa Safri. Then it was Rosmah’s ADC, Norhayati Hassan, and her husband, Abdul Aziz Buyong. And now we have Nasir Safar, who drove past Razak Baginda’s house very slowly, possibly to ensure that Altantuya, who was making a nuisance of herself, is picked up.

Would Najib like to challenge us on this? He can if he so wishes. Then Bala’s lawyer can arrange for the witness to testify to the MACC in London, as what they offered to do. But the problem is the MACC does not want to meet him in London. They want him to meet them at the Malaysian High Commission in Singapore.

Does the MACC think we are stupid? Meeting at the Malaysian High Commission in Singapore would be like meeting at Bukit Aman. Or should we just arrange to meet in Kamunting instead and save everyone a lot of trouble?

Oh, and don’t forget Najib’s brother who met Bala to threaten him and to force him to withdraw his most damaging Statutory Declaration.

STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at [deleted] do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.

5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.

12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.

14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.

15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.

18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.

19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.

20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.

21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.

22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-

25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.

25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that [deleted by nat out of respect to the family of the deceased].

25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.

25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-

28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.

28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.

28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.

28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.

6. That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.

28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.

33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.

47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.

49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.

50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-

54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )

declared by the abovenamed )

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]

this day of 2008 )

Before me,

………………………………….

Commissioner for Oath

Kuala Lumpur

Mystique of the white shirt, Nasir Safar, the ‘mystery man’ the day Altantuya diedShafee Abdullah: Fixing Anwar Ibrahim and Finishing Off Raja Petra

SHAFEE ABDULLAH: FIXING ANWAR IBRAHIM

Very troubling reports have been published, which reveal the existence of a medical report of an examination done by a doctor on Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan a few hours before Saiful lodged a police report that he had been sodomised. The medical report apparently shows that there is no evidence that he had been sodomised by anyone.

Such reports raise some very serious questions that require immediate answers:

(1) Are the police in possession of such a medical report?

(2) Was the doctor concerned interviewed by the police and was he detained for any length of time?

(3) Is the doctor concerned facing any form of intimidation and, if so, by whom?

(4) Is there a medical report by another doctor that either confirms or contradicts the first medical report?

(5) If it is true that the medical report exists showing a lack of prima facie evidence, what then could have been the justification for the vigorous actions taken against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as well as the public call by the authorities for his DNA sample?

The answers to these questions are of paramount importance, as they bring into focus the integrity of our law enforcement system.

These latest disclosures regarding the investigations into the sodomy allegations are not the only ones to raise questions that need answering. There is, for example, also the issue of P. Balasubramaniam’s abrupt “disappearance” that has yet to be satisfactorily explained. No one can deny that the circumstances of his first and second statutory declarations are highly unusual. All these show a pattern of events that cause much disquiet to right-thinking members of the public.

The Malaysian people are deeply troubled. A country that truly believes in the rule of law should not be faced with so many disturbing developments and unanswered questions.

The credibility of the Malaysian justice system as a whole is therefore at stake. The integrity of professionals, be they doctors or lawyers, must never be interfered with. The public must be left in no doubt that the criminal justice system in this country will not be misused or abused. There must be nothing less than an open and thorough investigation into these cases. This calls for the courage and professionalism of all those involved to do the right thing no matter the consequences. And those who have shown such courage and integrity must know that they live in a country where it is safe to do so.

Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan

President

Malaysian Bar

*************************************************

What Ambiga said in her press statement above is certainly true and she has cause for concern. But she would be even more concerned if she knows what we know about this whole matter.

A special police operations centre was set up some time ago to coordinate all activities related to the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy crisis. No, the special police operations centre was not set up AFTER the alleged sodomy act took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up way before 26 June 2008.

Why the need to set up a special police operations centre BEFORE the date of the alleged sodomy act? Are they clairvoyant and did they peep into their crystal ball and ‘see’ the crime happen before it actually happened? Was the special police operations centre set up so that they could solve the crime? Or was the special police operations centre set up BEFORE the date of the ‘crime’ so that they could invent the so-called crime?

Yes, questions and yet more questions. But this is not yet the icing on the cake. The icing on the cake is that this special police operations centre is not located in the police headquarters. It is located in the meeting room of the office of prominent Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah who possesses a notorious reputation for fixing cases such as those involving the people implicated in murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu or those alleged to have pinched the bottoms of cigar girls in the Havana Club in Kuala Lumpur.

Name me any questionable case and you will find the hand of Shafee Abdullah behind that case. And this same person is coordinating the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy allegation from the meeting room of his law office in Kenny Hills.

There are four police officers headed by an officer name Aziz who are based in this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. But why are they based in an Umno lawyer’s office instead of in the police headquarters? Is this an official police operation or is this a rogue operation? Yes, we have watched many Hollywood movies about the CIA’s Dirty Tricks Department. Have Shafee Abdullah and the Royal Malaysian Police also seen the same movie? It appears so because the special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm looks like a plot out of these movies.

In this special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is a whiteboard and on this whiteboard are two names: Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. Below these two names are all sorts of notes, scribblings and etchings. There are also charts and strategies on how both Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin can be implicated in various crimes and incarcerated until their teeth fall out of their gums.

Yes, the police report to Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah. And Shafee Abdullah coordinates this special police operation with the IGP and AG. And the purpose of this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is to explore how to incarcerate Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. And the special police operations centre has to be in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s office and not in the police headquarters because, officially, the IGP and AG are not involved in the Anwar sodomy case, as announced by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Shafee Abdullah is no ordinary man. In fact, he is not even a man; he is a devil. But he is Malaysia’s first and foremost sodomologist, a specialist in crimes of sodomy. And that is why the Pusrawi doctor’s report was rejected. He is just a normal doctor, a GP, argued the government. The prognosis of a normal doctor can’t be accepted as evidence in a sodomy case, never mind if he has been practicing medicine for two decades or more. They need the prognosis of a sodomy specialist, a sodomologist, and Shafee Abdullah is Malaysia’s first and foremost sodomologist.

That is why Senior Assistant Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof did not meet Saiful in the police station or at the police headquarters. The special police operations centre is not in the police station or at the police headquarters. It is in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. So it would be dangerous to meet Saiful in this law firm lest someone finds out. That is why Rodwan met Saiful in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.

Okay, so Rodwan met Saiful one day before the alleged crime took place. But then maybe Rodwan is clairvoyant or he has a crystal ball and he ‘saw’ that a crime of sodomy was going to take place the following day. Some people do have this gift of ‘foresight’. Nevertheless, whether the timeline appears a bit out of sync or not, they still have the ‘evidence’ to work on to ‘prove’ that Anwar did sodomise Saiful the day AFTER Saiful met Rodwan in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.

One such crucial evidence was supposed to be the doctor from Pusrawi’s medical examination of Saiful at 2.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the doctor said that he had examined Saiful and found no evidence of sodomy. This report has since surfaced and the doctor has gone missing so, now, there is no way they can use this evidence.

The next evidence was supposed to be the second medical examination done at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the outpatient department of the HKL was closed at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. So how could a second medical examination have been done? Yes, that’s right. No second medical examination was done and the doctors at the HKL refuse to doctor a medical report to say that the second medical examination had been done, when none had been done, or to say that they did find evidence of sodomy, when they did not.

Since none of the doctors at Pusrawi or HKL are cooperating with the police, the last piece of ‘evidence’ will have to be Saiful’s underwear. Okay, Saiful’s underwear does not really have Anwar’s semen stains on it. But this is a small matter. As long as someone from the Chemistry Department is prepared to testify that they did examine Saiful’s underwear and they did find Anwar’s semen stains on it, then that would be good enough. They will be able to build their case against Anwar and charge him for sodomy based on this ‘evidence’ from the Chemistry Department.

No, the Chemistry Department has NOT come out with their report yet. There is no report from the Chemistry Department that says they found Anwar’s semen stains on Saiful’s underwear. This is because they first of all need Anwar’s specimen so that they can plant it on the underwear and so that the Chemistry Department can then ‘discover’ it.

But Anwar is being bloody silly. He is being extremely pigheaded and stubborn. He refuses to hand over his specimen. How can they plant Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear when Anwar refuses to let them take his specimen? The Chemistry Department can’t prepare its report saying that it found Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear until the police are able to plant it there. But Anwar does not want to voluntarily hand over his specimen so this plan is being upset a bit.

But never mind. As soon as Parliament convenes later this month they will rush through a new law that will make it mandatory for you to hand over your specimen if the police demands that you do so. Refusing to hand over your specimen when the police demand you do so will soon become a crime and you can be sent to jail. They will try to pass this law before Merdeka Day of 31 August 2008 and they will try to backdate the law and make it retrospective so that any ‘crime’ committed before the passing of this law will also be covered.

Soon they will get Anwar once the DNA Act becomes law and Anwar can no longer refuse to hand over his specimen. Then, once they have obtained Anwar’s specimen, the Chemistry Department will be able to ‘discover’ it on Saiful’s underwear. Then they will be able to arrest and charge Anwar. And, who knows, they might even be able to convict him as well.

Yes, this Shafee Abdullah the sodomologist is good. He has names, charts, notes, scribbling and etchings all over his whiteboard in the meeting room of his law firm. This meeting room has been the special police operations centre for quite a while now. It was set up long before the alleged sodomy crime took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up not to solve the sodomy crime. It was set up to create the crime.

But, thus far, they lack one very crucial piece of evidence. They lack Anwar’s specimen that they need to plant on Saiful’s underwear. But they will get it as soon as the new DNA Act becomes law and they can use this law to force Anwar to hand over his specimen. Then Anwar is finished and they can close down the special police operations centre in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm and once again use this meeting room for fixing legal cases.

*************************************************

Lawyer: Abdul Razak Baginda ‘is completely unimplicated’

Abdul Razak Baginda, a prominent political analyst, knew the murdered Mongolian model. His lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, said he wouldn’t “go so far to say” that Abdul Razak had a relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu, but would say that “he knows the lady.”

He said he met his client Wednesday morning and heard his side of the story. “I am extremely relieved from my conversation … I am totally convinced of his innocence .. he is completely unimplicated.” [Associated Press via International Herald Tribune]

*************************************************

Anwar verdict puts Malaysia’s justice system on trial

Report by Tim Lester

ABC Online; 14 April 1999

MAXINE MCKEW: Well, to our own region now and the most publicised trial in Malaysia’s history ended today, with Anwar Ibrahim — the man once groomed to lead the nation — jailed for six years, after a judge found him guilty on four counts of corruption.

Asian leaders have joined human rights groups in denouncing the severity of the sentence. In Malaysia, there have been clashes between police and protesters in the wake of the judgment, suggesting widespread scepticism with the verdict. So, did the system succeed in catching a wayward politician, or did it dance to the tune of an opportunistic leader who wants a political enemy behind bars?

TIM LESTER: Conviction day for Anwar Ibrahim.

As his supporters took to the streets around Kuala Lumpur’s High Court, few doubted the outcome of the marathon corruption trial. For seven months now, they’ve watched Anwar battle to keep alive his shot at the country’s top job.

They’ve heard him say repeatedly the system was being used against him. Many Malaysians, perhaps most, believe it. They believe Anwar Ibrahim’s conviction was orchestrated to suit the PM and several of his close colleagues.

BRUCE GALE: There is a feeling among a large number of Malaysians that the trial wasn’t fair.

TIM LESTER: Singapore analyst Bruce Gale sees this perception — whether right or wrong — as a problem for the Mahathir Government.

BRUCE GALE: If you have large sections of the population believing that somehow the judiciary is not fair or impartial, then this is a very serious situation. It’s an undermining of a major national institution.

GURBACHAN SINGH: We could have easily shown by irrefutable evidence the involvement of several top politicians to bring Anwar Ibrahim down politically.

TIM LESTER: Among Anwar’s nine defence lawyers, there is deep frustration that many witnesses, documents, even tapes they had ready didn’t make it to evidence, because the judge wouldn’t allow them.

GURBACHAN SINGH: There was evidence of the involvement of the PM, as well, that he knew this process of political conspiracy was going on — he did nothing to stop it.

MAHATHIR MOHAMAD: I wish he hadn’t done this and he should have succeeded me and everything would be fine.

TIM LESTER: Political conspiracy — it was Anwar’s claim the moment Dr Mahathir dumped him as Deputy PM and his lawyers say it was vital to their defence of the four corruption charges. But Judge Augustine Paul ruled as irrelevant the suggestion that government ministers and officials cooked up the sex claims to ruin Anwar.

GURBACHAN SINGH: Most of the rulings where the judge could exercise discretion, went against us.

MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: When the trial first started, I think at least for the first two months or three, there were often times, I thought, where the judge was giving a lot of leeway to the defence.

TIM LESTER: Former prosecutor Shafee Abdullah praises Judge Paul for refusing to hear Anwar’s conspiracy argument in relation to the four corruption charges.

MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: Whether or not he committed those sexual offences have got nothing to do with the present charges.

TIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair?

Yes, says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.

MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: There are a lot of individuals out there who feel that the whole trial has gone completely bonkers. Many individuals think that Anwar did not receive a fair trial.

TIM LESTER: The damage from the trial goes beyond perceptions about Government influence over the judiciary to the police force.

MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: They hit me physically and they stripped me naked and asked me to dance in the room, with my hand handcuffed.

TIM LESTER: Anwar Ibrahim’s private secretary of 11 years was among hundreds arrested at the height of anti-government protests last year. He’s now making a disturbingly common claim in Kuala Lumpur — that police used brutality and humiliation in the hope of recruiting him as a witness against Anwar.

MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: Oh, yeah, they asked me to admit that I was sodomised by Anwar.

TIM LESTER: Three of five people cited in sex charges pending against Anwar have now withdrawn their claims and turned on police.

GURBACHAN SINGH: And they were picked up and forced — tortured by the police — to make allegations against Anwar, to admit to sodomy, which they repeatedly said never happened. And they’ve gone on affidavits, they’ve gone on statutory declarations to that effect.

TIM LESTER: Add in Anwar’s black eye — Malaysia’s highest-ranking officer at the time hit him while he was blindfolded and handcuffed. In the process of convicting Anwar, Malaysia’s police have earned themselves an image crisis.

Among other claims that didn’t make it to court — the Washington limousine driver who says a Malaysian embassy official asked him to accuse Anwar of sexual misconduct while visiting the US.

JAMAL AMRO: Then he asked me — he said “Relax”. Then he told me, “Anwar — did you ever bring girls for him, or boys or anything like that?”

I said, “No”.

He said “C’mon, if you say ‘Yes’, we can make some money”.

TIM LESTER: Jamal says he was told he could make more than $250,000 by going along with the sex claims against the then Deputy PM. Public anger over Anwar’s treatment has helped his wife, Wan Azizah, win backing for a new political party and an opposition alliance to fight Dr Mahathir at the next election.

MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: The hatred against the present leadership is swelling because they can not believe the manner they handled this issue against Anwar.

TIM LESTER: This trial and the events around it have thrown up challenges the Mahathir Government didn’t anticipate. Now, there’s the possibility of a united opposition at the next national election due within 12 months.

A powerful threat for Dr Mahathir, but it’s still not likely. The groups Anwar’s supporters need to bring together would make unusual partners.

BRUCE GALE: It seems extremely difficult for me to believe that post-election, that this alliance could hold. The policies of these parties are so diametrically opposed to one another. Islamic fundamentalists want an Islamic State. To the Chinese, this is an anathema — something they would never accept.

TIM LESTER: Many Malaysians don’t like the way their government and judicial system dealt with Anwar Ibrahim. Today’s verdict will only fuel their suspicions.

But Dr Mahathir is still in the middle ground of Malaysian politics. His enemies have a giant task — trying to bring together opposition parties into an alliance needed to capitalise on anti-government sentiment.

Mystique of the white shirt, Nasir Safar, the ‘mystery man’ the day Altantuya diedShafee Abdullah: Fixing Anwar Ibrahim and Finishing Off Raja PetraSHAFEE ABDULLAH: FIXING ANWAR IBRAHIM
In this special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is a whiteboard and on this whiteboard are two names: Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. Below these two names are all sorts of notes, scribblings and etchings.
Very troubling reports have been published, which reveal the existence of a medical report of an examination done by a doctor on Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan a few hours before Saiful lodged a police report that he had been sodomised. The medical report apparently shows that there is no evidence that he had been sodomised by anyone.
Such reports raise some very serious questions that require immediate answers:
(1) Are the police in possession of such a medical report?
(2) Was the doctor concerned interviewed by the police and was he detained for any length of time?
(3) Is the doctor concerned facing any form of intimidation and, if so, by whom?
(4) Is there a medical report by another doctor that either confirms or contradicts the first medical report?
(5) If it is true that the medical report exists showing a lack of prima facie evidence, what then could have been the justification for the vigorous actions taken against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as well as the public call by the authorities for his DNA sample?
The answers to these questions are of paramount importance, as they bring into focus the integrity of our law enforcement system.
These latest disclosures regarding the investigations into the sodomy allegations are not the only ones to raise questions that need answering. There is, for example, also the issue of P. Balasubramaniam’s abrupt “disappearance” that has yet to be satisfactorily explained. No one can deny that the circumstances of his first and second statutory declarations are highly unusual. All these show a pattern of events that cause much disquiet to right-thinking members of the public.
The Malaysian people are deeply troubled. A country that truly believes in the rule of law should not be faced with so many disturbing developments and unanswered questions.
The credibility of the Malaysian justice system as a whole is therefore at stake. The integrity of professionals, be they doctors or lawyers, must never be interfered with. The public must be left in no doubt that the criminal justice system in this country will not be misused or abused. There must be nothing less than an open and thorough investigation into these cases. This calls for the courage and professionalism of all those involved to do the right thing no matter the consequences. And those who have shown such courage and integrity must know that they live in a country where it is safe to do so.
Dato’ Ambiga SreenevasanPresidentMalaysian Bar
*************************************************What Ambiga said in her press statement above is certainly true and she has cause for concern. But she would be even more concerned if she knows what we know about this whole matter.
A special police operations centre was set up some time ago to coordinate all activities related to the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy crisis. No, the special police operations centre was not set up AFTER the alleged sodomy act took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up way before 26 June 2008.
Why the need to set up a special police operations centre BEFORE the date of the alleged sodomy act? Are they clairvoyant and did they peep into their crystal ball and ‘see’ the crime happen before it actually happened? Was the special police operations centre set up so that they could solve the crime? Or was the special police operations centre set up BEFORE the date of the ‘crime’ so that they could invent the so-called crime?
Yes, questions and yet more questions. But this is not yet the icing on the cake. The icing on the cake is that this special police operations centre is not located in the police headquarters. It is located in the meeting room of the office of prominent Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah who possesses a notorious reputation for fixing cases such as those involving the people implicated in murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu or those alleged to have pinched the bottoms of cigar girls in the Havana Club in Kuala Lumpur.
Name me any questionable case and you will find the hand of Shafee Abdullah behind that case. And this same person is coordinating the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy allegation from the meeting room of his law office in Kenny Hills.
There are four police officers headed by an officer name Aziz who are based in this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. But why are they based in an Umno lawyer’s office instead of in the police headquarters? Is this an official police operation or is this a rogue operation? Yes, we have watched many Hollywood movies about the CIA’s Dirty Tricks Department. Have Shafee Abdullah and the Royal Malaysian Police also seen the same movie? It appears so because the special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm looks like a plot out of these movies.
In this special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is a whiteboard and on this whiteboard are two names: Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. Below these two names are all sorts of notes, scribblings and etchings. There are also charts and strategies on how both Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin can be implicated in various crimes and incarcerated until their teeth fall out of their gums.
Yes, the police report to Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah. And Shafee Abdullah coordinates this special police operation with the IGP and AG. And the purpose of this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is to explore how to incarcerate Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. And the special police operations centre has to be in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s office and not in the police headquarters because, officially, the IGP and AG are not involved in the Anwar sodomy case, as announced by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
Shafee Abdullah is no ordinary man. In fact, he is not even a man; he is a devil. But he is Malaysia’s first and foremost sodomologist, a specialist in crimes of sodomy. And that is why the Pusrawi doctor’s report was rejected. He is just a normal doctor, a GP, argued the government. The prognosis of a normal doctor can’t be accepted as evidence in a sodomy case, never mind if he has been practicing medicine for two decades or more. They need the prognosis of a sodomy specialist, a sodomologist, and Shafee Abdullah is Malaysia’s first and foremost sodomologist.
That is why Senior Assistant Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof did not meet Saiful in the police station or at the police headquarters. The special police operations centre is not in the police station or at the police headquarters. It is in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. So it would be dangerous to meet Saiful in this law firm lest someone finds out. That is why Rodwan met Saiful in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.
Okay, so Rodwan met Saiful one day before the alleged crime took place. But then maybe Rodwan is clairvoyant or he has a crystal ball and he ‘saw’ that a crime of sodomy was going to take place the following day. Some people do have this gift of ‘foresight’. Nevertheless, whether the timeline appears a bit out of sync or not, they still have the ‘evidence’ to work on to ‘prove’ that Anwar did sodomise Saiful the day AFTER Saiful met Rodwan in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.
One such crucial evidence was supposed to be the doctor from Pusrawi’s medical examination of Saiful at 2.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the doctor said that he had examined Saiful and found no evidence of sodomy. This report has since surfaced and the doctor has gone missing so, now, there is no way they can use this evidence.
The next evidence was supposed to be the second medical examination done at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the outpatient department of the HKL was closed at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. So how could a second medical examination have been done? Yes, that’s right. No second medical examination was done and the doctors at the HKL refuse to doctor a medical report to say that the second medical examination had been done, when none had been done, or to say that they did find evidence of sodomy, when they did not.
Since none of the doctors at Pusrawi or HKL are cooperating with the police, the last piece of ‘evidence’ will have to be Saiful’s underwear. Okay, Saiful’s underwear does not really have Anwar’s semen stains on it. But this is a small matter. As long as someone from the Chemistry Department is prepared to testify that they did examine Saiful’s underwear and they did find Anwar’s semen stains on it, then that would be good enough. They will be able to build their case against Anwar and charge him for sodomy based on this ‘evidence’ from the Chemistry Department.
No, the Chemistry Department has NOT come out with their report yet. There is no report from the Chemistry Department that says they found Anwar’s semen stains on Saiful’s underwear. This is because they first of all need Anwar’s specimen so that they can plant it on the underwear and so that the Chemistry Department can then ‘discover’ it.
But Anwar is being bloody silly. He is being extremely pigheaded and stubborn. He refuses to hand over his specimen. How can they plant Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear when Anwar refuses to let them take his specimen? The Chemistry Department can’t prepare its report saying that it found Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear until the police are able to plant it there. But Anwar does not want to voluntarily hand over his specimen so this plan is being upset a bit.
But never mind. As soon as Parliament convenes later this month they will rush through a new law that will make it mandatory for you to hand over your specimen if the police demands that you do so. Refusing to hand over your specimen when the police demand you do so will soon become a crime and you can be sent to jail. They will try to pass this law before Merdeka Day of 31 August 2008 and they will try to backdate the law and make it retrospective so that any ‘crime’ committed before the passing of this law will also be covered.
Soon they will get Anwar once the DNA Act becomes law and Anwar can no longer refuse to hand over his specimen. Then, once they have obtained Anwar’s specimen, the Chemistry Department will be able to ‘discover’ it on Saiful’s underwear. Then they will be able to arrest and charge Anwar. And, who knows, they might even be able to convict him as well.
Yes, this Shafee Abdullah the sodomologist is good. He has names, charts, notes, scribbling and etchings all over his whiteboard in the meeting room of his law firm. This meeting room has been the special police operations centre for quite a while now. It was set up long before the alleged sodomy crime took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up not to solve the sodomy crime. It was set up to create the crime.
But, thus far, they lack one very crucial piece of evidence. They lack Anwar’s specimen that they need to plant on Saiful’s underwear. But they will get it as soon as the new DNA Act becomes law and they can use this law to force Anwar to hand over his specimen. Then Anwar is finished and they can close down the special police operations centre in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm and once again use this meeting room for fixing legal cases.
*************************************************
Lawyer: Abdul Razak Baginda ‘is completely unimplicated’
Abdul Razak Baginda, a prominent political analyst, knew the murdered Mongolian model. His lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, said he wouldn’t “go so far to say” that Abdul Razak had a relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu, but would say that “he knows the lady.”
He said he met his client Wednesday morning and heard his side of the story. “I am extremely relieved from my conversation … I am totally convinced of his innocence .. he is completely unimplicated.” [Associated Press via International Herald Tribune]
*************************************************
Anwar verdict puts Malaysia’s justice system on trialReport by Tim LesterABC Online; 14 April 1999
MAXINE MCKEW: Well, to our own region now and the most publicised trial in Malaysia’s history ended today, with Anwar Ibrahim — the man once groomed to lead the nation — jailed for six years, after a judge found him guilty on four counts of corruption.
Asian leaders have joined human rights groups in denouncing the severity of the sentence. In Malaysia, there have been clashes between police and protesters in the wake of the judgment, suggesting widespread scepticism with the verdict. So, did the system succeed in catching a wayward politician, or did it dance to the tune of an opportunistic leader who wants a political enemy behind bars?
TIM LESTER: Conviction day for Anwar Ibrahim.
As his supporters took to the streets around Kuala Lumpur’s High Court, few doubted the outcome of the marathon corruption trial. For seven months now, they’ve watched Anwar battle to keep alive his shot at the country’s top job.
They’ve heard him say repeatedly the system was being used against him. Many Malaysians, perhaps most, believe it. They believe Anwar Ibrahim’s conviction was orchestrated to suit the PM and several of his close colleagues.
BRUCE GALE: There is a feeling among a large number of Malaysians that the trial wasn’t fair.
TIM LESTER: Singapore analyst Bruce Gale sees this perception — whether right or wrong — as a problem for the Mahathir Government.
BRUCE GALE: If you have large sections of the population believing that somehow the judiciary is not fair or impartial, then this is a very serious situation. It’s an undermining of a major national institution.
GURBACHAN SINGH: We could have easily shown by irrefutable evidence the involvement of several top politicians to bring Anwar Ibrahim down politically.
TIM LESTER: Among Anwar’s nine defence lawyers, there is deep frustration that many witnesses, documents, even tapes they had ready didn’t make it to evidence, because the judge wouldn’t allow them.
GURBACHAN SINGH: There was evidence of the involvement of the PM, as well, that he knew this process of political conspiracy was going on — he did nothing to stop it.
MAHATHIR MOHAMAD: I wish he hadn’t done this and he should have succeeded me and everything would be fine.
TIM LESTER: Political conspiracy — it was Anwar’s claim the moment Dr Mahathir dumped him as Deputy PM and his lawyers say it was vital to their defence of the four corruption charges. But Judge Augustine Paul ruled as irrelevant the suggestion that government ministers and officials cooked up the sex claims to ruin Anwar.
GURBACHAN SINGH: Most of the rulings where the judge could exercise discretion, went against us.
MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: When the trial first started, I think at least for the first two months or three, there were often times, I thought, where the judge was giving a lot of leeway to the defence.
TIM LESTER: Former prosecutor Shafee Abdullah praises Judge Paul for refusing to hear Anwar’s conspiracy argument in relation to the four corruption charges.
MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: Whether or not he committed those sexual offences have got nothing to do with the present charges.
TIM LESTER: So was Anwar’s trial fair?
Yes, says Shafee Abdullah. But even he admits Malaysians don’t see it that way.
MUHAMMAD SHAFEE ABDULLAH: There are a lot of individuals out there who feel that the whole trial has gone completely bonkers. Many individuals think that Anwar did not receive a fair trial.
TIM LESTER: The damage from the trial goes beyond perceptions about Government influence over the judiciary to the police force.
MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: They hit me physically and they stripped me naked and asked me to dance in the room, with my hand handcuffed.
TIM LESTER: Anwar Ibrahim’s private secretary of 11 years was among hundreds arrested at the height of anti-government protests last year. He’s now making a disturbingly common claim in Kuala Lumpur — that police used brutality and humiliation in the hope of recruiting him as a witness against Anwar.
MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: Oh, yeah, they asked me to admit that I was sodomised by Anwar.
TIM LESTER: Three of five people cited in sex charges pending against Anwar have now withdrawn their claims and turned on police.
GURBACHAN SINGH: And they were picked up and forced — tortured by the police — to make allegations against Anwar, to admit to sodomy, which they repeatedly said never happened. And they’ve gone on affidavits, they’ve gone on statutory declarations to that effect.
TIM LESTER: Add in Anwar’s black eye — Malaysia’s highest-ranking officer at the time hit him while he was blindfolded and handcuffed. In the process of convicting Anwar, Malaysia’s police have earned themselves an image crisis.
Among other claims that didn’t make it to court — the Washington limousine driver who says a Malaysian embassy official asked him to accuse Anwar of sexual misconduct while visiting the US.
JAMAL AMRO: Then he asked me — he said “Relax”. Then he told me, “Anwar — did you ever bring girls for him, or boys or anything like that?”
I said, “No”.
He said “C’mon, if you say ‘Yes’, we can make some money”.
TIM LESTER: Jamal says he was told he could make more than $250,000 by going along with the sex claims against the then Deputy PM. Public anger over Anwar’s treatment has helped his wife, Wan Azizah, win backing for a new political party and an opposition alliance to fight Dr Mahathir at the next election.
MUHAMED AZMIN ALI: The hatred against the present leadership is swelling because they can not believe the manner they handled this issue against Anwar.
TIM LESTER: This trial and the events around it have thrown up challenges the Mahathir Government didn’t anticipate. Now, there’s the possibility of a united opposition at the next national election due within 12 months.
A powerful threat for Dr Mahathir, but it’s still not likely. The groups Anwar’s supporters need to bring together would make unusual partners.
BRUCE GALE: It seems extremely difficult for me to believe that post-election, that this alliance could hold. The policies of these parties are so diametrically opposed to one another. Islamic fundamentalists want an Islamic State. To the Chinese, this is an anathema — something they would never accept.
TIM LESTER: Many Malaysians don’t like the way their government and judicial system dealt with Anwar Ibrahim. Today’s verdict will only fuel their suspicions.
But Dr Mahathir is still in the middle ground of Malaysian politics. His enemies have a giant task — trying to bring together opposition parties into an alliance needed to capitalise on anti-government sentiment.

Filed under: Uncategorized

• 5:10 am 0

UMNO Barisan weapon Called Time

We all know that UMNO Barisan society is schizoid, to say the least. This dichotomy between fast development and slow resolution of justice is a new socoiological phenomenon – beyond the descriptive capabilities of justice delyaed is justice denied. Time indeed is a great healer and at the same time, a great destroyer. While many wounds get healed by the time, many other wounds become cancerous. Justice delayed is, of course, justice denied but it happens many times as in the case of that they escape the justice in this world but get transported to the other world by the passage of time to face divine justice. In fact, Such is the turn that times takes on the use of time as an effective multipurpose weapon. It is one of the most flexible cost effective weapons ever produced. One can easily expand or contract its shape and size according to his convenience. But access to the use of this weapon is however restricted. You have to be strong and mighty to have the authority to use it according to your sweet will.The wretched Mahathir najib have no right to use it to their advantage. Entitlement is restricted to ROSMA only. You will do well to keep this in mind before opting Its a harsh reality that we forget everything with time and get involved in our daily lives that we dont have time for thinking about it or doing sumthing abt it. We all know that UMNO Barisan society is schizoid, to say the least. This dichotomy between fast development and slow resolution of justice is a new socoiological phenomenon – beyond the descriptive capabilities of justice delyaed is justice denied. Time indeed is a great healer and at the same time, a great destroyer. While many wounds get healed by the time, many other wounds become cancerous. Justice delayed is, of course, justice denied but it happens many times as in the case of that they escape the justice in this world but get transported to the other world by the passage of time to face divine justice. In fact, Such is the turn that times takes on the use of time as an effective multipurpose weapon. It is one of the most flexible cost effective weapons ever produced. One can easily expand or contract its shape and size according to his convenience. But access to the use of this weapon is however restricted. You have to be strong and mighty to have the authority to use it according to your sweet will.The wretched Mahathir najib have no right to use it to their advantage. Entitlement is restricted to ROSMA only. You will do well to keep this in mind before opting

Its a harsh reality that we forget everything with time and get involved in our daily lives that we dont have time for thinking about it or doing sumthing abt it.

The problems in doing so are many, but one of them is certainly that delays in justice are not a product of systemic deficiencies alone and occur in part because of a deliberate intent to this end. If Justice Liberhan had indeed produced a report three months after the demolition of the Babri Masjid, he would delivered a political hot potato of a spectacularly indigestible kind. It would have been incumbent upon the government to initiate some action, and risk polarizing the electorate far too sharply for its comfort. Seventeen years on, the report is of symbolic value only, and that is also being way too charitable. In retrospect, the Congress might well feel that it took the right call- with the babri Masjid gone, the BJP has struggled to create an umbrella under which it can expand and intensify its appeal and action against key leaders at that time might have cascaded into a more sustained movement. Of course, that is speculation, but it does point to the uses delays and prevarication can be put to, particularly in a democracy which demands a certain transparency in the way we enact and enforce laws.

The use of time as a weapon manifests itself in different ways in India. The stay order is a judicial weapon founded on institutionalized stasis. The court decides not to decide and lets status quo prevail an interim form of remedial justice. Having frozen things in their place, it often proceeds to take years, even decades to unfreeze things, by which time the final judgment often becomes irrelevant.

Delaying justice does more than deny it for it works towards preventing us from seeking justice in the first place. The idea of going to court is far too daunting for anyone but the most needy or the most judicially adept. More subtly, by building in time as a variable, the notion of what is a just resolution is itself altered. In many cases, the judgment, when it comes, bears little or no relevance to the reality of today’s circumstances.

The power of time has in fact grown with time. As things move faster, as our interest peaks and withers away in ever shorter time spans, slowness becomes a potent counterforce that challenges the very foundation of our lives. For unlike the past when out of sight did mean out of mind, we are increasingly entering a world where it is tantamount to being out of existence. By making all phenomena more intense and by dramatically speeding up the world, we have created a sense of perpetual motion that leaves us with little room for reflection and remembrance. Yesterday’s headlines disappear from the dustbins of our memory with clockwork efficiency. Remember Nithari, the minister who walked into a lions cage, the girl molested on New Years eve in Mumbai, Prashant & Amit who ruled over the hearts of two North Eastern states, the cash-for-votes scandal that seemed to have rocked the very foundation of our democracy at the time? With so many new scandals, new films that need to be promoted and reality shows that occupy our minds, how can we possibly remember anything older than 3 months? Once it disappears from our passive memory it either needs an anniversary or something dramatically stupid like Manu Sharma’s club hopping and brawling or Rathore’s smirk for it to come back to centre stage. In both these cases, we remembered because of some determined help by the people in question. What did them in was the image they evoked rather than the substantive reality of their misdemeanor. Take Rathore’s case- had he been seen hobbling out of court helped by his wife while coughing incessantly, do you think we would felt the outrage we did?

The trick then is to outride outrage. So many people have done that successfully- Rahul Mahajan, Indian cricketers tainted for match fixing, Salman Khan, Fardeen Khan, Lalit Modi, and of course politicians of all hues. You can be arrested for drug busts, play with the emotions of an entire nation, run over people on a pavement and still hope to have a reality show of your own, if you understand the power of time well enough.

It took sixteen years to get a verdict in the Ruchika case (nine years to register an FIR) and seventeen years to get a report from the Liberhan commission (it was originally given 3 months to do so and received 48 extensions). And as we all know, these are by no means exceptions; it is normal for court cases to drag on for decades. Enough has been said about the many shortcomings of the judicial system in India and there is hardly any articulated disagreement among most commentators about the need to overhaul it.
The problems in doing so are many, but one of them is certainly that delays in justice are not a product of systemic deficiencies alone and occur in part because of a deliberate intent to this end. If Justice Liberhan had indeed produced a report three months after the demolition of the Babri Masjid, he would delivered a political hot potato of a spectacularly indigestible kind. It would have been incumbent upon the government to initiate some action, and risk polarizing the electorate far too sharply for its comfort. Seventeen years on, the report is of symbolic value only, and that is also being way too charitable. In retrospect, the Congress might well feel that it took the right call- with the babri Masjid gone, the BJP has struggled to create an umbrella under which it can expand and intensify its appeal and action against key leaders at that time might have cascaded into a more sustained movement. Of course, that is speculation, but it does point to the uses delays and prevarication can be put to, particularly in a democracy which demands a certain transparency in the way we enact and enforce laws.
The use of time as a weapon manifests itself in different ways in India. The stay order is a judicial weapon founded on institutionalized stasis. The court decides not to decide and lets status quo prevail an interim form of remedial justice. Having frozen things in their place, it often proceeds to take years, even decades to unfreeze things, by which time the final judgment often becomes irrelevant.
Delaying justice does more than deny it for it works towards preventing us from seeking justice in the first place. The idea of going to court is far too daunting for anyone but the most needy or the most judicially adept. More subtly, by building in time as a variable, the notion of what is a just resolution is itself altered. In many cases, the judgment, when it comes, bears little or no relevance to the reality of today’s circumstances.
The power of time has in fact grown with time. As things move faster, as our interest peaks and withers away in ever shorter time spans, slowness becomes a potent counterforce that challenges the very foundation of our lives. For unlike the past when out of sight did mean out of mind, we are increasingly entering a world where it is tantamount to being out of existence. By making all phenomena more intense and by dramatically speeding up the world, we have created a sense of perpetual motion that leaves us with little room for reflection and remembrance. Yesterday’s headlines disappear from the dustbins of our memory with clockwork efficiency. Remember Nithari, the minister who walked into a lions cage, the girl molested on New Years eve in Mumbai, Prashant & Amit who ruled over the hearts of two North Eastern states, the cash-for-votes scandal that seemed to have rocked the very foundation of our democracy at the time? With so many new scandals, new films that need to be promoted and reality shows that occupy our minds, how can we possibly remember anything older than 3 months? Once it disappears from our passive memory it either needs an anniversary or something dramatically stupid like Manu Sharma’s club hopping and brawling or Rathore’s smirk for it to come back to centre stage. In both these cases, we remembered because of some determined help by the people in question. What did them in was the image they evoked rather than the substantive reality of their misdemeanor. Take Rathore’s case- had he been seen hobbling out of court helped by his wife while coughing incessantly, do you think we would felt the outrage we did?
The trick then is to outride outrage. So many people have done that successfully- Rahul Mahajan, Indian cricketers tainted for match fixing, Salman Khan, Fardeen Khan, Lalit Modi, and of course politicians of all hues. You can be arrested for drug busts, play with the emotions of an entire nation, run over people on a pavement and still hope to have a reality show of your own, if you understand the power of time well enough.

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

S. Augustine Paul

S. Augustine Paul a/l Sinnappen, currently Federal Court judge, subjected himself to be a political whore in 1998. While a Kuala Lumpur high court judge, he participated in the political conspiracy orchestrated by the then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to bring down the then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim. He put through a show trial of Anwar and subsequently convicted the latter of sodomy and corruption.

The conviction was clearly riddled with holes. Augustine Paul allowed the prosecution had to change the date of the alleged offence several times after Anwar’s lawyers demonstrated conclusively that he could not have been at the place at the date nominated. So crude was the frame-up that in one case the building in which the offence was alleged to have occurred, had not even been constructed.

augustine_paul In the end, Augustine Paul took the extraordinary step of allowing the prosecution to nominate 7.45 p.m. somewhere between January and March 1993. Even though the defence produced documents to account for Anwar’s movements for every day over that period, Augustine Paul ignored the evidence and found Anwar guilty.

By convicting Anwar, Augustine Paul solely relied on the framed up allegations of the witness, Azizan Abu Bakar, who was shown by the defence team to beunreliable.

Augustine Paul was infamously called the “irrelevant judge” for repeatedly refusing submissions of evidence by Anwar’s defence team and ruled them ‘irrelevant’.

augustine Obviously a judicial officer without anyproper talent noteworthy, he had been a sessions court judge, until one week before Anwar’s sodomy trial. He was promoted promptly to be a high court judge and took on the case. After serving his part in the political conspiracy, he was summarily promoted to be a judge of Court of Appeal on 1 August 2003, and then on to be a judge of Federal Court, the apex court in Malaysia, on 17 June 2005.

He ruled on Apr 16, 2009 that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly. It is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.

The judges of the Federal Court have failed the people and the government of this country when they chose to ignore the law of the Constitution of Malaysia. In other words the judges have refused to do justice according to law.

Incidentally, ultra vires does not mean “outside the law”. It means “outside one’s jurisdiction, beyond the scope of one s power or authority”. And we may ask, who is the Federal Court to say what is beyond the jurisdiction of the Speaker when the supreme law of the country says that “the validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.

He was born October 12, 1944 in Batu Gajah, Perak. He had his early education at Sultan Yusof School, Batu Gajah and Anderson School, Ipoh. He was called to the Bar of Inner Temple, London in 1971 and obtained his Bachelor of Laws Degree from the University of London as an external student in 1979. He is married to Dr Mary with two children, Dr Juliana Sharmini and Alan John.

Justice M S Liberhan did not need 17 years and a thousand pages to tell us what has been public knowledge since December 6, 1992. The Babri mosque was not torn down in the dark of night. It was brought down slowly, stone by stone, in Sunday sunlight, before hundreds of journalists, to the cheers of countless thousands of kar sewaks in and around Ayodhya. The mosque was not dynamited in a minute; it was demolished by crowbar and shovel.

The link between corruption and economic reforms was also echoed that corruption had gone up after the liberalization process. It confirmed to me that otherwise-sensible people still do not get it. They do not understand that corruption persists in Malaysia because reforms are incomplete and scams occur in sectorsGood societies do not look to heroes. They quietly reform their institutions Not only economic reforms, we need police reforms to make our investigating agencies autonomous; judicial reforms to speed up justice and deter future AGUSTINE PUALS; administrative reforms to punish rotten bureaucrats and reward good ones and bring accountability; finally, political reforms to prevent criminals from entering politics. Only then will dharma rise in our nation.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has applauded constitutional law expert Abdul Aziz Bari for speaking out about the rotten state of the rule of law and democracy in Malaysia. “Nothing will change unless those who know rise up to expose the vermin (that are) eating and destroying our national institutions and democratic values,” said Zaid, once the de facto law minister.

Political analyst Khoo Kay Peng alluded to imbalances in governance, with the executive able to strong-arm the judiciary and legislature with impunity. He expressed no surprise over the claim that the BN violates the constitution, noting that there have been many instances where the federal government has bypassed the supreme law in making decisions.

Universiti Malaya social sciences lecturer Noor Sulastry Ahmad acknowledged the situation. “This is political hegemony. Most politicians, especially from the ruling coalition manipulate and use (various) institutions to ensure the status quo and to maintain their grip on power,” she said. As a case in point, she referred to the sacking of Salleh Abas as Lord President in 1988, which effectively brought judicial independence to an end.

That was what was reported by Malaysiakini today. The long and the short of it is the powers-that-be uses the legal system and the judiciary for political ends. And, according to this report, this has been going on for a long, long time

Now let’s take a walk down memory lane to a period ten years back in time. Ten years ago, Anwar Ibrahim faced two trials. The first was for the crime of corruption and the second was for sodomy.

The key ‘evidence’ in both those trials was the testimony of the Prosecution’s ‘Star Witness’. There was no other evidence other than the sole testimony of this so-called victim.

But the Prosecution’s Star Witness was unreliable. He kept changing his testimony. He said one thing during one trial and another thing in the next trial. In fact, the Prosecution’s Star Witness finally admitted three times while under oath that Anwar Ibrahim never sodomised him at all.

Even the trial judge was irritated. He blurted out that the witness is so unreliable. “He says one thing today and another thing tomorrow,” said the judge. However, in his written judgement, the judge said that the witness may be inconsistent and may actually even have lied but this does not mean his entire testimony needs to be rejected. He finds the testimony of the witness “as strong as the Rock of Gibraltar”.

This judge probably obtained his law degree from the back of a Cornflakes box.

The great thing is that u can’t take a time out from your conscience.

The sad thing is that all those involved in the persecution of Ramli, etc. have no conscience.

So, the PR must make sure they get their act together to make sure they sweep the UMNOputras out of Putrajaya and make sure all those scumbags hiding behind the veils are given their just dues

1. the presiding Judge had not resorted to the favourite word “irrelevant’ against their interests;

2. neither is the Presiding Judge having any name with the inititals “AP” (because these 2 letters means you are issued passports to instant millions for importation of exotic foreign cars by the ruling Government);

3. the fall guy Morais is inconsistent with his evidence so far that he needs a London break to soak it up in the red light District of Soho;

4. the Prosecution must have earned their law qualifications from the Malaysian local institutions to lead the charge by banging on ‘association’ as a crucial element to bulid up their cases;

5. Lingam is not around to fix up the role of the Presiding Judge;

6. Tun is no longer the PM to send a dismissal threatening letter to the Presiding Judge by requesting the Agong to institute a Tribunal for misconduct hearing;

Both Ramli and Rosli shall pioneer to bring disrepute on the top brass sitting in Bukit Aman. A long journey always start with a single step. Now, 2 joint steps are taken. Your lead Counsels , their team and the rakyat are all in this together to cast the evil regime unto the swine.

This wouldn’t be the first time that the prosecution is clutching at straws. But then there are those in the judiciary who are waiting to throw a lifeline to tip the balance. The maxim that ‘justice must not only be done but be seen to be done’ carries no meaning to the judiciary. The rot is everywhere and for those who still want to vote for BN the next time around, you deserve all the rottenness.

Filed under: Uncategorized

	Mr Kohilan a smelly … on Mahathir admitting conspiracy …
	Mr Kohilan a smelly … on RPK…….OUR JUDGES C…
	Mr Kohilan a smelly … on beautifully beastifull rosamah…
	Malaysia's BREAK… on beautifully beastifull rosamah…
	Malaysia's BREAK… on beautifully beastifull rosamah…

read more click this NAJIS TOLD THE PRESS THAT ANWAR’S ACCUSER, SAIFUL BUKHARI AZLAN WENT TO SEE HIM to get his green light before making a police report

SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2010

readthis exclusive story When you have Idiotic and Ridiculous Prime Minister to reappoint a retarted brained IGP dont blame Najib

read this exlusive articlejudges are predators, not protectors paraiyan PREPOSTERIOUS asshole MAHATHIR sold his soul to stay in power

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010

THEY HAVE DECIDED: TO PROTECT THE LAW OR TURN MALAYSIA INTO A PARIAH STATE LIKE ZIMBABWE!readmoreALL SET, JUDGES IN PLACE the untouchable beautifully beastifully Rosmah to sent Anwar Ibrahim to jail Rosmah has no time to entertain ‘wild allegations’

HALL OF SHAME

THE NECESSITY OF

… JUDGES ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE PURSUIT OF POWER. IF THEY WERE, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BECOME JUDGES.

JUDGING THE JUDGES

+++++

WE IN PERAK HAVE TO LEARN IT THE HARD WAY. BUT OUR HOPE AND DREAM FOR A PEOPLE’S GOVERNMENT IN PERAK SHALL NEVER DIE, REGARDLESS OF TUESDAY’S FEDERAL COURT JUDGMENT.

READ THIS EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE BY THE TAXI DRIVER

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

READ MORE CLICK THISMahathir admitting conspiracy in the 1988 sodomy accusation?who pushed it in Rosma? Mumtaj’s girl Khairil Asshole (Pegawai Khas Dato’ Seri Najib)

THANKS TO ZORROW

The MACC’s lady started it the EX DAP PROSTITUTE OPEN HER PUSSY

TROJAN FROGS & TOADS

WELCOME TO NAJISLANDHERE YOU CAN SEE FROGS JUMPING BACK AND FORTH! COURTESY OF NAJIS’S DIRTY TACTICS.

BETWEEN IDEALISM AND REALISM: THE CHOICE IS YOURS IDEALISM- THE HEARTBEAT OF A NATION

RELATED ARTICLETHE MAHATIRFICATION OF MALAYSIAN JUDISCIARY

BUT judges ARE state actorsCLICK THIS

SNAKEY PARAYANGanesan,READ THIS FULLS TORYWHICH animal will say that Police intrusion in Perak assembly within law the son of Malaysia’s Third Prime Minister has shit in his brains

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2009

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

Blog Stats

Meta

Blogroll

Top Clicks

Recent Comments