on rosmaaa order?it’s mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
The judge should order the Public Prosecutor to release the said documents to the defence lawyers in order that they can operate on a level playing field, simple as that. The judge did not have to wait for the defence lawyers to fight for something that is their right to have. But does the Public Prosecutor want to give the defence a level playing field? If the shenanigans involving RPK’s various trials are anything to go by I don’t think so. I therefore fear the worst outcome for Anwar. He’ll be found guilty and thrown into jail thereby scuppering the Opposition’s hopes of forming a govt. in the near future. Sure, the international community will protest but Najib will just cock a snook at them and tell them to mind their own business. Who cares what the world thinks of you when your main aim is for your party to rule for another 50 years or more? People will protest but the FRU, the Police and maybe even the military will put down any form of protest. Look what they are doing to peaceful protestors wearing black. You see, my fellow Malaysians, people looking into Malaysia see a different picture from what we see from the inside. To them Malaysia is a wonderful,modern, vibrant and successful country. But they only see the window dressing, unfortunately.
the detention and brutal treatment of anwar ibrahim 20 september 1998 with fabricated charges,now najib will face real charges the truth that refuses to surface,now ”abuse of power like text message correspondence is between najib tun abdul razak, and shafee abdullah“tentative” charge and that “all is not lost
why the Attorney-General’s Chambers hasNOT lodged a police report against najib for making deal with him and let the whole workd know On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, Bala was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
the Attorney-General’s Chambers has lodged a police report against Raja Petra over the statutory declaration.
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said the allegations were “highly defamatory” and if found untrue, those making the allegations would have to face the consequences.
“We want to investigate because we want the truth. As far as I am concerned, we have to look at it seriously.”
“If it’s true, we will act accordingly. If not, the writer will be investigated,” he said, adding that the report was lodged in Putrajaya
“The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, the Deputy Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and his wife Datin SeriRosmah Mansor cannot 
remain silent
All Malaysians who values a just and independent judicial system in Malaysia must voice out their disapproval of such dastardy behaviour by the Public Prosecutor.
All dealings must be done above board and must be seen to be just and fair. Such behaviour by the Public Prosecutor can only means one thing.
It can only means that the Public Prosecutor is unwilling to release the required information because by releasing the information, the Public Prosecutor no longer has a viable case against the defense or it could mean that the Public Prosecutor is merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar as was exposed in the previous case against Anwar! If there is any concrete evidences, you can bet your bottom dollar that the Public Prosecutor will be the first to publish it in the public domain to substantiate his case and claims against the accused!
If there are no evidences or documentations as claimed, then, there is no way they can present them….so, if they can’t present the required information as requested, then, it could only means that there are no such evidences/documents available at all!
In Malaysia, the judiciary and court system has lately become the laughing stock in the international arena. Even Malaysians do not have much confidence of getting correct and educated judgements…let alone a fair and just one! With such behaviour by the Public Prosecutor, what else could we expect???
A justice system must not only be fair and just, it must also be seen by the public to be fair and just! merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
on the latest bombshell,” wrote Lim Kit Siang, leader of the opposition Democratic Action Party. “The credibility and legitimacy of the Abdullah premiership and government will suffer a mortal blow if Abdullah, Najib and Rosmah remain silent on Raja Petra’s bombshell allegations.”
The woman arrived in Kuala Lumpur on Oct 9 with her sister and a cousin in search of the political analyst whom she claimed fathered her 16-month-old son.
Altantuya’s case came to light after her sister lodged a police report following her disappearance on Oct 21. Police identified the political analyst, who is said to have befriended the deceased a few years ago, as a suspectShe had accompanied Baginda to France when he was involved in negotiating the purchase of two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government through a French-Spanish joint venture, Armaris, for the Malaysian defense ministry, which was headed by Najib as minister. The submarines were bought through a Kuala Lumpur-based company, Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which at the time was owned by yet another company, Ombak Laut, which was wholly owned by Abdul Razak Baginda.The €1 billion (RM4.5 billion) contract to buy the submarines was non-competitive and netted Perimekar €114 million.
|
Note that save for the earlier delivery of just one statement and a few photo prints picked out of a purported CCTV recording, nothing else that was requested by us have been supplied to us hitherto. We have today filed a notice of motion applying to the High Court to compel the Public Prosecutor to deliver, as a matter of right, as provided by law under Sections 51 and 51A of the Criminal Procedure Code, inter alia, statements of witnesses, original DNA samples for DNA testing, medical notes, photographs, CCTV recordings of relevant dates and other evidence which they intend to use against DSAI in the trial (see enclosed Affidavit of Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim), to enable us to advise and prepare the best defence for Dato’ Seri Anwar. We reiterate that Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim is lawfully entitled to the best defence, as such unless ALL that we have applied for are delivered up to us by the Public Prosecutor, within reasonable time, the legal team will not be in a position to proffer and prepare adequately the best defence that our client is lawfully entitled to. In this regard, we are deeply disappointed and rather perturbed that the Public
Prosecutor has acted most unprofessionally and unethically. This is predicated by the lackadaisical and deliberate attitude displayed by the Public Prosecutor in not supplying us with the above said statements, recordings and so on, despite our several formal letters of request made, as early as 8th September 2008 and thereafter on 19th Jan 2009, 29th April 2009, followed by several reminders thereon. Note that save for the earlier delivery of just one statement and a few photo prints picked out of a purported CCTV recording, nothing else that was requested by us have been supplied to us hitherto. More over, we have only received one reply of late dated 6th June 2009 rejecting all our requests except for the request for electro pharograms (which has yet to be supplied). Further, the Public Prosecutor has deceptively stated in the said letter that they have already supplied us with the CCTV recordings when they have never done so. It is also gravely disappointing that even though the trial is set to commence on the 1st of July 2009, the above necessary statements, recordings and so on have yet to be supplied to us. We consider this act of non-cooperation by the Public Prosecutor as deliberately designed to, inter alia: i. scupper and deny the preparation of the best possible defence for our client; ii. deprive and or conceal from our client the evidence that is favourable to him in his defence; iii. practise ambush prosecution as they did unto him in 1998/99, leaving our client little or no time and opportunity to get expert or other assistance during trial; iv. deprive our client the opportunity to check and verify the veracity and authenticity of the original DNA and other samples, which they are using to make baseless allegations against our client at this stage; and v. deny our client a fair trial We further state that by virtue of the above, the Public Prosecutor has much to hide and as such, this prosecution of Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim is clearly an abuse, frivolous, unjust and is tantamount to a political persecution. As such, in the name of justice, we again called upon the Public Prosecutor to withdraw the charge against our client with immediate effect. Sankara Nair |
- Posted in: Uncategorized
20 Comments
Trackbacks